WANG Chaowen, PENG Xiaolong, FENG Ning, MA Jingjing, DENG Peng, ZHU Suyang. Vertical grid optimization of numerical simulation of coalbed methane reservoir[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(5): 117-122. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.018
Citation: WANG Chaowen, PENG Xiaolong, FENG Ning, MA Jingjing, DENG Peng, ZHU Suyang. Vertical grid optimization of numerical simulation of coalbed methane reservoir[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(5): 117-122. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.018

Vertical grid optimization of numerical simulation of coalbed methane reservoir

Funds: 

National Science and Technology Major Project(2016ZX05066-004)

More Information
  • Received Date: December 19, 2017
  • Published Date: October 24, 2018
  • Numerical simulation is a common method for the research of coalbed methane(CBM)reservoir engineering. However, the effect of the vertical grid size for the simulation results are often ignored when modeling. So, the behavior of fluid-flow in vertical grids, the gravitational differentiation of gas and water, and the pressure drop funnel are not accurately reflected, which have great influence on the simulation results. In order to study the influence of vertical grid division on numerical simulation of CBM production process, different simulators are used to simulate different longitudinal grid sizes. Permeability equivalent method, local grid refinement(LGR)method and new fracturing method in simulator are used to simulate fracturing. 15 schemes of 3 methods were simulated. The results show that the vertical grid division has great influence on the production, when the grid size is 1.5 m, the calculation results are more accurate, which can satisfy the simulation demand. The reasonable division of vertical grid can better show the phenomenon of gas and moisture difference in layers, and help to analyze the flow state of liquids, at the same time, is in favor of history matching and production prediction.
  • [1]
    GONZALEZ K G. Adaptive grid refinement improves gas injection modeling[C]//SPE Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in Dubai. 2016,SPE-184487-STU.
    [2]
    LIE K A,MøYNER O,NATVIG J R. Use of multiple multiscale operators to accelerate simulation of complex geomodels[J]. SPE Journal,2017,22(6):1929-1945.
    [3]
    KARIMI-FARD M,DURLOFSKY L. Accurate resolution of near-well effects in upscaled models using flow-based unstructured local grid refinement[J]. SPE Journal,2012,17(4):1084-1095.
    [4]
    GU F,CHALATURNYK R J. Numerical simulation of stress and strain due to gas sorption/desorption and their effects on in situ permeability of coalbeds[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2006,45(10):52-62.
    [5]
    AMINIAN K,AMERI S. Predicting production performance of CBM reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering,2009,1:25-30.
    [6]
    DURUCAN S,SHI J Q. Improving the CO2 well injectivity and enhanced coalbed methane production performance in coal seams[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2009,77:214-221.
    [7]
    WEI J, WU C, WANG Q, et al. Interlayer interference mechanism of multi-seam drainage in a CBM well:An example from Zhucang syncline[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2016,26(6):1101-1108.
    [8]
    VISHAL V,SINGH T N,RANJITH P G. Influence of sorption time in CO2-ECBM process in Indian coals using coupled numerical simulation[J]. Fuel,2015,139:51-58.
    [9]
    SHI J Q,DURUCAN S,FUJIOKA M. A reservoir simulation study of CO2 injection and N2 flooding at the Ishikari coalfield CO2 storage pilot project,Japan[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2008,2:47-57.
    [10]
    GENTZIS T,BOLEN D. The use of numerical simulation in predicting coalbed methane productivity from the Gates coals, Alberta Inner Foothills,Canada:Comparison with Mannville coal CBM production in the Alberta syncline[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2008,74:215-236.
    [11]
    PAN Z J,CONNELL L D. Reservoir simulation study of CO2 storage in formations containing both aquifers and coal seams[J]. Energy Procedia,2011,4:3095-3102.
    [12]
    ZIARANI A S,AGUILERA R,CLARKSON C R. Investigating the effect of sorption time on coalbed methane recovery through numerical simulation[J]. Fuel,2011,90:2428-2444.
    [13]
    CLARKSON C R,MCGOVERN J M. Optimization of coalbed methane reservoir exploration and development strategies through integration of simulation and economics[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2005,8(6):502-519.
    [14]
    SUN H,CHAWATHÉ A,HOTEIT H,et al. Understanding shale gas flow behavior using numerical simulation[J]. SPE Journal, 2015,20(1):142-154.
    [15]
    王超文,彭小龙,贾春生,等. 煤层气藏顶板水平井排水采气数值模拟[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2016,23(4):112-116.

    WANG Chaowen,PENG Xiaolong,JIA Chunsheng,et al. Numerical simulation researches on gas recovery by water drainage of horizontal well in coalbed methane[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2016,23(4):112-116.
    [16]
    窦莲,彭小龙,冉艳,等.煤层气藏中一种模拟压裂直井的等效方法[J].特种油气藏,2012,19(4):96-99.

    DOU Lian,PENG Xiaolong,RAN Yan,et al.An equivalent method for simulation vertical well fracturing in coal gas reservoirs[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2012,19(4):96-99.
    [17]
    李传亮.油藏工程:第二版[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:173-174.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Bo, JIN Chenghong, LIU Jiang, WANG Zhiwei, LI Shenjian, SHENG Mao. Parameter optimization for multistage horizontal well fracturing based on multi-cluster perforation for deep coal measure gas: A case study of the Jurassic Baijiahai area in the Junggar Basin[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2025, 53(4): 86-93. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.11.0746
    [2]FENG Shuren, ZHANG Cong, ZHANG Jinxiao, LIU Zhong, CUI Xinrui, CHAO Weiwei. Gas-water differentiation characteristics of CBM reservoirs in Xiadian block, Qinshui basin[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(5): 129-134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.020
    [3]LANG Yuquan, CHEN Tongjun, MA Li, MA Guodong. Water content prediction of roof sandstone using AVO technology[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(3): 127-132. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.03.021
    [4]QIAO Meiying, CHENG Pengfei, LIU Zhenzhen. Mine water inflow prediction based on GA-SVM[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(6): 117-122. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.06.019
    [5]YE Wanjun, LIU Zhongxiang, YANG Gengshe, ZHAO Zhipeng. Test of water migration of remolded loess under temperature variation[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(4): 126-130. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.04.022
    [6]YUE Xiaopeng, BAI Chaoying, YUE Chongwang. Accuracy analysis of elastic wave field simulation based on high-order staggered grid finite difference scheme[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(1): 125-130. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.01.025
    [7]YUE Chongwang, WANG Fei. The simulation of acoustic wave propagation in the borehole surrounded by vertical transversely isotropic (VTI) media using staggered-grid high-order finite-difference method[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(4): 125-131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.04.024
    [8]QIAN Jin, CUI Ruofei, CHEN Tongjun. Anisotropic numerical simulation of coal-bearing strata with finite-difference[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2010, 38(2): 63-67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.02.016
    [9]Zhang Qingling. THE MOISTURE CONTENT UNDER COAL RESERVOIR CONDITION——STUDY ON THE DETERMINATION METHOD OF BALANCE MOISTURE[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1999, 27(4): 25-28.
    [10]Chen Jianming. THE STRUCTURAL DIFFERENTIATION OF THE COAL SEAM ASH IN CESHUI COAL-BEARING FORMATION IN LIANSHAO COALFIELD[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1992, 20(5): 12-16.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (90) PDF downloads (12) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return