ZHOU Anning,ZHANG Zhi,CHEN Yongan,et al. Exploring the pyrolysis of tar-rich coals under the catalysis of cerium-modified magnetic core-shell HZSM-5[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(7):144−155. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0003
Citation: ZHOU Anning,ZHANG Zhi,CHEN Yongan,et al. Exploring the pyrolysis of tar-rich coals under the catalysis of cerium-modified magnetic core-shell HZSM-5[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(7):144−155. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0003

Exploring the pyrolysis of tar-rich coals under the catalysis of cerium-modified magnetic core-shell HZSM-5

More Information
  • Received Date: January 04, 2024
  • Revised Date: April 22, 2024
  • Accepted Date: June 24, 2024
  • Available Online: June 23, 2024
  • Objective 

    Tar-rich coals are valuable resources integrating coal, tar, and gas properties. Catalytic pyrolysis serves as a significant approach for achieving green and low-carbon development of tar-rich coals. However, the research and development of efficient and recyclable catalysts for the pyrolysis of tar-rich coals remains highly challenging.

    Methods 

    With HZSM-5@SiO2@MgFe2O4 (HSMF) as the raw material, this study prepared HZSM-5@SiO2@MgFe2O4 (mHSMF) with a hierarchical porous structure using the hydrothermal method and alkali modification, followed by the preparation of cerium-modified mHSMF (5-CeO2/mHSMF) using the precipitation method. Employing a fixed-bed reactor, this study investigated the regulatory effects of 5-CeO2/mHSMF on the pyrolysis products of tar-rich coals from the Shenfu block, along with the anti-carbon deposition performance of 5-CeO2/mHSMF.

    Results and Conclusions 

    The results indicate that the CeO2-based modification of HSMF was conducive to the formation of a hierarchical porous structure comprising micropores and mesopores on the surface of HSMF. Through pyrolysis at 650°C in the N2 atmosphere for 1 hr using 5-CeO2/mHSMF as a catalyst, the coals exhibited a tar yield of 13.38%, equivalent to a tar yield of 176% in the Gray-King assay. Compared to the pyrolysis of raw coals, the catalytic pyrolysis exhibited increases in the aliphatic-hydrocarbon and benzene-compound contents in tar of 3.04% and 3.07%, respectively and an increase in the H2 and CH4 content in coal gas of 10.49%. Through CeO2-based modification, the catalyst enhanced the anti-carbon deposition performance by 86.1%, with carbon deposits of merely 11.60 mg/g and tending to form a stable graphitized structure. Overall, 5-CeO2/mHSMF manifests significant regulation of the distribution and composition of the products from the catalytic pyrolysis of coals in the Shenfu block, along with encouraging anti-carbon deposition performance and magnetic recyclability.

  • [1]
    王双明,王虹,任世华,等. 西部地区富油煤开发利用潜力分析和技术体系构想[J]. 中国工程科学,2022,24(3):49−57. DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2022.03.006

    WANG Shuangming,WANG Hong,REN Shihua,et al. Potential analysis and technical conception of exploitation and utilization of tar-rich coal in western China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE,2022,24(3):49−57. DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2022.03.006
    [2]
    王双明,师庆民,王生全,等. 富油煤的油气资源属性与绿色低碳开发[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1365−1377.

    WANG Shuangming,SHI Qingmin,WANG Shengquan,et al. Resource property and exploitation concepts with green and low-carbon of tar-rich coal as coal-based oil and gas[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(5):1365−1377.
    [3]
    SHI Qingmin,MI Yichen,WANG Shuangming,et al. Pyrolysis behavior of tar-rich coal with various coal-forming environments:A TGA and in situ transmission FTIR study[J]. Fuel,2024,358:130250. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130250
    [4]
    ZHAO Yan,SHI Qiong,LI Zonglu,et al. Preparation of carbon-based microwave absorbing materials by hybrid activation pyrolysis of lignin and coal[J]. Materials Letters,2022,328:133155. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133155
    [5]
    LANCET D,PECHT I. Spectroscopic and immunoch-emical studies with nitrobenzoxadiazolealanine,a fluorescent dinitrophenyl analog[J]. Biochemistry,1977,16(23):5150−5157. DOI: 10.1021/bi00642a031
    [6]
    刘瑞春,牛犇,张君涛,等. 煤热解工艺及其增油技术研究进展[J]. 现代化工,2022,42(7):37−41.

    LIU Ruichun,NIU Ben,ZHANG Juntao,et al. Advances in coal pyrolysis process and oil-enhancing technology[J]. Modern Chemical Industry,2022,42(7):37−41.
    [7]
    卫小芳,王建国,丁云杰. 煤炭清洁高效转化技术进展及发展趋势[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2019,34(4):409−416.

    WEI Xiaofang,WANG Jianguo,DING Yunjie. Progress and development trend of clean and efficient coal utilization technology[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2019,34(4):409−416.
    [8]
    穆飞,倪效磊,乔英云,等. 煤催化热解焦油提质研究进展[J]. 现代化工,2022,42(7):51−55.

    MU Fei,NI Xiaolei,QIAO Yingyun,et al. Research progress on upgrading tar in coal catalytic pyrolysis[J]. Modern Chemical Industry,2022,42(7):51−55.
    [9]
    李刚,张穗穗,张妮娜,等. MeMo/USY催化剂对神东煤热解产物的调控[J]. 化工进展,2019,38(3):1329−1337.

    LI Gang,ZHANG Suisui,ZHANG Nina,et al. Regulation of Shendong coal pyrolysis products based on MeMo/USY catalyst[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress,2019,38(3):1329−1337.
    [10]
    SHI Pengcheng,CHANG Guozhang,TAN Xiaoli,et al. Enhancement of bituminous coal pyrolysis for BTX production by Fe2O3/MoSi2-HZSM-5 catalysts[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis,2020,150:104867. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104867
    [11]
    张穗穗,李刚,闵小建,等. MxOy/USY双功能催化剂对神东煤的快速热解产物的调控[J]. 化工进展,2018,37(8):3029−3037.

    ZHANG Suisui,LI Gang,MIN Xiaojian,et al. Regulation of the rapid pyrolysis products of Shendong coal by MxOy/USY bifunctional catalyst[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress,2018,37(8):3029−3037.
    [12]
    薛爽,骆仲泱,孙浩然,等. 金属改性结合核壳结构协同调控酶解木质素催化热解液体产物分布的研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术,2022,28(5):507−513.

    XUE Shuang,LUO Zhongyang,SUN Haoran,et al. Regulation of metal modification combined with core-shell structure on liquid products during catalytic fast pyrolysis of enzymatic hydrolysis lignin[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology,2022,28(5):507−513.
    [13]
    王德亮,陈兆辉,余剑,等. 不同硅铝比HZSM-5分子筛对煤热解挥发物催化提质的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报,2021,49(5):634−640. DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813(21)60030-0

    WANG Deliang,CHEN Zhaohui,YU Jian,et al. Effect of Si/Al ratio of HZSM-5 zeolites on catalytic upgrading of coal pyrolysis volatiles[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2021,49(5):634−640. DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813(21)60030-0
    [14]
    杨珍,曹景沛,朱陈,等. B-ZSM-5酸调控及催化褐煤热解挥发分制轻质芳烃研究[J]. 化工学报,2021,72(11):5633−5642.

    YANG Zhen,CAO Jingpei,ZHU Chen,et al. Catalytic conversion of lignite pyrolysis volatiles for enriching light aromatics over B-ZSM-5[J]. CIESC Journal,2021,72(11):5633−5642.
    [15]
    GAO Shasha,TANG Yakun,WANG Lei,et al. NiFe nanoalloys in-situ immobilized on coal based activated carbons through one-step pyrolysis as magnetically recoverable catalysts for reduction of 4-nitrophenol[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2017,702:531−537. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.375
    [16]
    张蕾,陈雅,贾阳,等. 煤制兰炭过程中挥发性有机污染物和臭氧协同处理机理[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2024,44(1):135−143.

    ZHANG Lei,CHEN Ya,JIA Yang,et al. Synergistic treatment mechanism of volatile organic pollutants and ozone in coal-based semi-coke process[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2024,44(1):135−143.
    [17]
    SMIRNOV A N,KRYLOVA S A,PETUKHOV V N,et al. Conversion of coal over an oxide catalyst produced from natural high-magnesia siderite[J]. Coke and Chemistry,2019,62(10):468−473. DOI: 10.3103/S1068364X19100119
    [18]
    张军兴,周安宁,闫宁,等. 磁性Mo/HZSM-5@SiO2@Fe3O4催化剂可控制备及煤催化热解[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(6):1985−1994.

    ZHANG Junxing,ZHOU Anning,YAN Ning,et al. Controlled preparation and catalytic pyrolysis of coal over magnetic Mo/HZSM-5@SiO2@Fe3O4 catalyst[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(6):1985−1994.
    [19]
    陈永安,周安宁,李云龙,等. 磁性MgFe2O4及其核壳催化剂制备与煤热解性能研究[J]. 化工学报,2022,73(7):3026−3037.

    CHEN Yongan,ZHOU Anning,LI Yunlong,et al. Preparation and coal pyrolysis performance of magnetic MgFe2O4 and its core-shell catalysts[J]. CIESC Journal,2022,73(7):3026−3037.
    [20]
    HOFF T C,HOLMES M,PROANO-AVILES J,et al. Decoupling the role of external mass transfer and intracrystalline pore diffusion on the selectivity of HZSM-5 for the catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering,2017,5(10):8766−8776.
    [21]
    GAO Junhua,ZHOU Hao,ZHANG Fucan,et al. Effect of preparation method on the catalytic performance of HZSM-5 zeolite catalysts in the MTH reaction[J]. Materials,2022,15(6):2206. DOI: 10.3390/ma15062206
    [22]
    WU Hong,LIU Fei,YI Yun,et al. Catalytic and deactivated behavior of SAPO-34/ZSM-5 composite molecular sieve synthesized by in situ two-step method[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology,2021,15:1844−1853. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.017
    [23]
    张云鹏,李明罡,邢恩会,等. 不同结构扩孔分子筛催化MTP反应行为及表面积炭物种表征[J]. 燃料化学学报,2018,46(9):1101−1112.

    ZHANG Yunpeng,LI Minggang,XING Enhui,et al. Methanol to propylene reaction performance and trapped carbonaceous species over zeolites with different topologies[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2018,46(9):1101−1112.
    [24]
    DAI Gongxin,WANG Shurong,ZOU Qun,et al. Improvement of aromatics production from catalytic pyrolysis of cellulose over metal-modified hierarchical HZSM-5[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2018,179:319−323. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.07.023
    [25]
    JIN Tao,WANG Hongtao,PENG Jiebang,et al. Catalytic pyrolysis of lignin with metal-modified HZSM-5 as catalysts for monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons production[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2022,230:107201. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107201
    [26]
    KHEZRI H,IZADBAKHSH A,IZADPANAH A A. Promotion of the performance of La,Ce and Ca impregnated HZSM-5 nanoparticles in the MTO reaction[J]. Fuel Processing Technology,2020,199:106253. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106253
    [27]
    LÖFBERG A,GUERRERO-CABALLERO J,KANE T,et al. Ni/CeO2 based catalysts as oxygen vectors for the chemical looping dry reforming of methane for syngas production[J]. Applied Catalysis B:Environmental,2017,212:159−174. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.048
    [28]
    李睿杰,章菊萍,史健,等. Ni/CeO2催化剂的金属−载体界面调控及其低温化学链甲烷干重整性能研究[J]. 燃料化学学报,2022,50(11):1458−1470. DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813(22)60032-X

    LI Ruijie,ZHANG Juping,SHI Jian,et al. Regulation of metal-support interface of Ni/CeO2 catalyst and the performance of low temperature chemical looping dry reforming of methane[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2022,50(11):1458−1470. DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813(22)60032-X
    [29]
    LI Xin,REZAEI F,LUDLOW D K,et al. Synthesis of SAPO-34@ZSM-5 and SAPO-34@Silicalite-1 Core-Shell Zeolite Composites for Ethanol Dehydration[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2018,57(5):1446−1453.
    [30]
    BÊCHE E,CHARVIN P,PERARNAU D,et al. Ce 3d XPS investigation of cerium oxides and mixed cerium oxide (CexTiyOz)[J]. Surface & Interface Analysis,2008,40(3/4):264−267.
    [31]
    孟竹辉,刘倩,钟文琪,等. Ni-Ce-La/HZSM-5催化焦油模化物甲苯重整反应研究[J]. 太阳能学报,2023,44(3):260−269.

    MENG Zhuhui,LIU Qian,ZHONG Wenqi,et al. Study on Ni-Ce-La/HZSM-5 catalyzed reformation of tar modle compounds toluene[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2023,44(3):260−269.
    [32]
    TANG Songshan,ZHANG Changsen,XUE Xiangfei,et al. Catalytic pyrolysis of lignin over hierarchical HZSM-5 zeolites prepared by post-treatment with alkaline solutions[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis,2019,137:86−95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2018.11.013
    [33]
    OU Zhiliang,RAN Jingyu,QIU Huayu,et al. Uncovering the effect of surface basicity on the carbon deposition of Ni/CeO2 catalyst modified by oxides in DRM[J]. Fuel,2023,335:126994. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126994
    [34]
    李勇,闫伦靖,李晓荣,等. 酸/碱催化剂对低阶煤热解挥发分转化行为的作用机制研究[J]. 化工学报,2022,73(3):1173−1183.

    LI Yong,YAN Lunjing,LI Xiaorong,et al. Study on the mechanism of acid/base catalyst on the release behavior of volatiles during low rank coal pyrolysis[J]. CIESC Journal,2022,73(3):1173−1183.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHAN Xinyu, GAO Lin, ZHAO Fanghao, WANG Yongyin, LIU Ping, HAN Sen. Experimental study on proportioning of ultra-high strength similar materials for large similarity ratio model tests[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2023, 51(11): 109-118. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.05.0237
    [2]SONG Yanqi, WANG Shilei, SUN Chuan, HAO Liangjun. Similar model test and mechanical analysis of fault structure[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(5): 150-156. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.05.021
    [3]ZHANG Fan, MA Geng, TAO Yunqi, LIU Xiao, FENG Dan, LI Rui. Proportioning experiment of similar material for coal and rock model test[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(1): 119-124. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.021
    [4]HE Jun, ZHENG Zeyong, CHEN Liang. Change features of outburst parameters in the thermal simulation experiment of low metamorphic coal[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(5): 28-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.05.006
    [5]CHENG Jun, ZHANG Lihong, WU Guodai, LIU Jingqing, LIU Zixuan. Relationship between tectonic stress field and coal/gas outburst[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2012, 40(4): 1-4,11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2012.04.001
    [6]JING Xing-peng, WANG Ya-chao, WANG Wei-feng, PANG Xiang-wei, XU Ping. An experimental research on coalbed spontaneous combustion simulation[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2009, 37(4): 15-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2009.04.004
    [7]LI Xin-hu. Lithology identification methods contrast based on support vector machines at different well logging parameter[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2007, 35(3): 72-76,80.
    [8]HUANG Qing-xiang, LIU Teng-fei. Simulating test on the subsidence law of subsurface water resisting layer upon shallow coalbed mining[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2006, 34(5): 34-37.
    [9]PENG Su-ping, MENG Zhao-ping, LI Yu-lin. Influence of faults on coal roof stability by physical modeling study[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2001, 29(3): 1-4.
    [10]Yang Yingtao, Li Kangkang. THE WATER INRUSH MECHANISM IN COAL SEAM FLOOR BY THE PHYSICAL ANALOG SIMULATION TECHNIQUE[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1997, 25(S1): 33-36.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 贺丹,杨甫,马丽,付德亮,张丽维. 古城矿区富油煤赋存特征及主控因素分析. 煤炭技术. 2024(02): 97-103 .
    2. 宁树正,张莉,徐小涛,张建强,邹卓. 新疆北部早、中侏罗世富油煤分布规律及控制因素. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(01): 244-254 .
    3. 乔军伟,董伸培,苏刚,王昌建,焦龙祥,梁向阳,杜芳鹏,李领晨. 陕北曹家滩矿井富油煤地球化学特征及其沉积环境. 西安科技大学学报. 2024(02): 289-300 .
    4. 郭伟,杨盼曦,俞尊义,杨甫,王晶,马丽,李红强,杨伯伦,吴志强. 陕北富油煤分子模型构建及其热解提油分子动力学特性. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(07): 132-143 . 本站查看
    5. 师庆民,耿旭虎,王双明,蔡玥,韩波,王生全,张哲豪,何羽飞. 基于煤体真密度和自然伽马响应规律的富油煤判识. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(07): 85-96 . 本站查看
    6. 宋超,陈晓坤,徐勇,于志金. 含水率对油气伴生煤恒温热解后氧化特性的影响. 西安科技大学学报. 2024(04): 699-708 .
    7. 李致潍,赵正威,冯烁,韩长城. 吐哈盆地大南湖矿区富油煤赋存特征及主控因素分析. 中国煤炭. 2024(09): 1-8 .
    8. 李新虎,刘晓梅,李晓君,杨承文,李健,程光艺,丁佳萌. 陇东地区富油煤地质特征与主控因素研究. 西安科技大学学报. 2024(05): 901-910 .
    9. 朱士飞,刘威,张静,秦云虎,毛礼鑫. 富油煤煤质特征与原位热解技术开发利用现状. 煤质技术. 2024(06): 23-33 .
    10. 杨甫,段中会,马丽,付德亮,田涛,贺丹,岳明娟. 陕西省富油煤分布及受控地质因素. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(03): 171-181 .
    11. 东振,张梦媛,陈艳鹏,冯烁,薛俊杰,陈浩,田继军,陈姗姗,赵宇峰,王兴刚,焦立新,李斌. 三塘湖-吐哈盆地富油煤赋存特征与资源潜力分析. 煤炭学报. 2023(10): 3789-3805 .
    12. 马丽,王双明,段中会,杨甫,付德亮,贺丹,张丽维. 陕西省富油煤资源潜力及开发建议. 煤田地质与勘探. 2022(02): 1-8 . 本站查看
    13. 高文博,冯烁,田继军,吴斌. 三塘湖煤田汉水泉矿区富油煤赋存特征及沉积环境分析. 煤炭工程. 2022(10): 136-140 .
    14. 王双美. 青龙寺井田主采煤层古泥炭沼泽演化规律研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2021(03): 181-188 .
    15. 吴鹏,曹地,朱光辉,柳雪青,李勇,李洋冰,胡维强,刘再振,孔为,费景亮. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区海陆过渡相页岩气地质特征及成藏潜力. 煤田地质与勘探. 2021(06): 24-34 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (84) PDF downloads (19) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return