Volume 49 Issue 5
Nov.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
HOU Yanwei, GUO Jianlei, SI Yinnyu, JIANG Tao. Research on three-component response of ground-airborne TEM considering emission current waveform[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(5): 238-246,252. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.05.026
Citation: HOU Yanwei, GUO Jianlei, SI Yinnyu, JIANG Tao. Research on three-component response of ground-airborne TEM considering emission current waveform[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(5): 238-246,252. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.05.026
shu

Research on three-component response of ground-airborne TEM considering emission current waveform

  • Xi'an Research Institute Co. Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Corp., Xi'an 710077, China

More Information
  • Received Date: January 05, 2021
  • Revised Date: June 21, 2021
  • Available Online: November 05, 2021
  • Published Date: October 24, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The ground-airborne TEM has received more and more attention in coal goaf exploration and other fields. In order to provide a theoretical basis for the processing and interpretation of ground-airborne transient electromagnetic data, it is necessary to study the influence of the transmitted current waveform parameter on the three-component response characteristics of ground-airborne TEM. Taking trapezoidal waves as an example, this article firstly studies the frequency distribution of different emission current waveform, and then investigates the effects of the rising edge time, pulse width and turn-off time of the transmitted waveform on the three-component magnetic field response of ground-air transient electromagnetic based on the three-dimensional finite difference time domain method(3D-FDTD). The results show that the rising edge time basically has no effect on the three-component secondary field response; the turn off time effect on the three-component secondary field response is mainly concentrated before 0.2 ms, and the longer the turn off time, the greater the impact on the pure abnormal response; the pulse width has the main effect on the three-component secondary field response after 0.1 ms, and the shorter the pulse width, the greater the impact on the pure abnormal response. The results of the three-dimensional goaf model show that the characteristics of the off-time and pulse width on the response of the three-component abnormal field and background field are basically the same; the distribution range and depth of anomalous objects can be judged by the three-component pure anomaly field response multi-track map and time track map. The research results will provide some valuable theoretical references for the selection of the parameters of the ground-airborne TEM excitation source waveform.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (21)
  • [1]
    张莹莹, 李貅. 地空瞬变电磁法研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(4): 1735-1741. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201704043.htm

    ZHANG Yingying, LI Xiu. Research progress on ground-airborne transient electromagnetic method[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(4): 1735-1741. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201704043.htm
    [2]
    许洋. 半航空电磁一维正反演研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2014.

    XU Yang. Study about 1D forward and inversion of SAEM[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
    [3]
    侯彦威. TEM探测深部煤层上覆多电性层的OCCAM反演[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2018, 46(6): 169-173. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.06.025

    HOU Yanwei. OCCAM inversion for detecting overlying multiple electrical layers above deep coal seams by TEM[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2018, 46(6): 169-173. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.06.025
    [4]
    吴启龙. 半航空瞬变电磁视电阻率成像及在复杂地形区域隧道勘察中的应用[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2019.

    WU Qilong. Semi-airborne transient electromagnetic apparent resistivity imaging and its application in tunnel survey in complex terrain areas[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2019.
    [5]
    张庆辉, 田忠斌, 林君, 等. 时域电性源地空电磁系统在煤炭采空积水区勘查中的应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(8): 2509-2515. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201908026.htm

    ZHANG Qinghui, TIAN Zhongbin, LIN Jun, et al. Application of time domain electrical source ground airborne electromagnetic system in goaf water exploration[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(8): 2509-2515. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201908026.htm
    [6]
    NABIGHIAN M N. Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: Volume 1, theory[M]. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1988.
    [7]
    ELLIOTT P. The principles and practice of FLAIRTEM[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1998, 29(1/2): 58-59.
    [8]
    SMITH R S, ANNAN P, MC GOWAN P D. A Comparison of data from airborne, semi-airborne, and ground electromagnetic systems[J]. Geophysics, 2001, 66(5): 1379-1385. DOI: 10.1190/1.1487084
    [9]
    MOGI T, TANAKA Y, KUSUNOKI K, et al. Development of grounded electrical source airborne transient EM (GREATEM)[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1998, 29(1/2): 61-64.
    [10]
    嵇艳鞠, 王远, 徐江, 等. 无人飞艇长导线源时域地空电磁勘探系统及其应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(11): 3640-3650. DOI: 10.6038/cjg20131105

    JI Yanju, WANG Yuan, XU Jiang, et al. Development and application of the grounded long wire source airborne electromagnetic exploration system based on an unmanned airship[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(11): 3640-3650. DOI: 10.6038/cjg20131105
    [11]
    李肃义, 林君, 阳贵红, 等. 电性源时域地空电磁数据小波去噪方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(9): 3145-3152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201309027.htm

    LI Suyi, LIN Jun, YANG Guihong, et al. Ground-airborne electromagnetic signals de-noising using a combined wavelet transform algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(9): 3145-3152. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201309027.htm
    [12]
    张莹莹, 李貅, 姚伟华, 等. 多辐射场源地空瞬变电磁法多分量全域视电阻率定义[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(8): 2745-2758. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201508012.htm

    ZHANG Yingying, LI Xiu, YAO Weihua, et al. Multi-component full field apparent resistivity definition of multi-source ground-airborne transient electromagnetic method with galvanic sources[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(8): 2745-2758. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201508012.htm
    [13]
    李貅, 张莹莹, 卢绪山, 等. 电性源瞬变电磁地空逆合成孔径成像[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(1): 277-288. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201501025.htm

    LI Xiu, ZHANG Yingying, LU Xushan, et al. Inverse synthetic aperture imaging of ground-airborne transient electromagnetic method with a galvanic source[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(1): 277-288. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201501025.htm
    [14]
    武军杰. 地-井与地-空瞬变电磁联合解释方法研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2018.

    WU Junjie. Study on joint interpretation of borehole and ground-airborne TEM data[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2018.
    [15]
    孙怀凤, 李貅, 李术才, 等. 考虑关断时间的回线源激发TEM三维时域有限差分正演[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(3): 1049-1064. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201303034.htm

    SUN Huaifeng, LI Xiu, LI Shucai, et al. Three-dimensional FDTD modeling of TEM excited by a loop source considering ramp time[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(3): 1049-1064. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201303034.htm
    [16]
    李贺. 直接时间域矢量有限元瞬变电磁三维正演模拟[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2016.

    LI He. Three-dimensional transient electromagnetic forward modeling in the direct time-domain by vector finite element[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2016.
    [17]
    覃庆炎. 发射电流波形变化对固定翼航空瞬变电磁响应的影响[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2013, 28(5): 2673-2679. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201305050.htm

    QIN Qingyan. Effect of transmitter current waveform variation on the fixed-wing airborne transient electromagnetic response[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2013, 28(5): 2673-2679. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWJ201305050.htm
    [18]
    赵越, 许枫, 李貅, 等. 浅海瞬变电磁全波形响应特征及探测能力分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62(4): 1526-1540. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201904028.htm

    ZHAO Yue, XU Feng, LI Xiu, et al. Exploration capability of transmitter current waveform on shallow water TEM response[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(4): 1526-1540. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201904028.htm
    [19]
    姜升. 瞬变电磁发射机电流波形改善技术研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2017.

    JIANG Sheng. Research on improvement for quality of current waveform of time-domain electromagnetic transmitter[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2017.
    [20]
    张军. 矿井超浅层高分辨率瞬变电磁探测技术[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(4): 219-225. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.04.030

    ZHANG Jun. The high-resolution transient electromagnetic detection technology for ultra-shallow layer in coal mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2020, 48(4): 219-225. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.04.030
    [21]
    郭建磊. 阵列源瞬变电磁法隧道高分辨超前探测研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.

    GUO Jianlei. Transient electromagnetic method using source array for tunneling ahead geological prospecting of high resolution[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2017.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]TAO Junhong, ZHAO Jingtao, SHENG Tongjie. A neural network-based method for analyzing diffracted wave velocity[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(9): 166-175. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.05.0309
    [2]CHEN Chen, HE Xingyi, NIU Qinghe, YU Hongxu, XIE Xiangyu. Study on P-wave velocity and mechanical response characteristic of rock in coal seam roof with supercritical CO2 injection[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(5): 98-104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.05.011
    [3]YANG Yanjun, ZHU Shujie, ZHANG Xiaowen, WANG Ji. Velocity analysis method of reflected in-seam wave detection technique[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(5): 218-224. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.05.027
    [4]SHI Shuanghu, DEND Zhiwen, LIU Liping, ZHOU Heng, LI Bimin, GUO Guihong. Uncertainty of shear wave velocity prediction by Xu-White model[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2015, 43(5): 95-99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2015.05.022
    [5]WANG Chufeng, ZHANG Weidong, LI Meng, MA Qingtao. Experimental study of dynamic and static elastic parameters of No.15 coal seam in Shouyang block of Shanxi Province[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2011, 39(6): 72-75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2011.06.017
    [6]WANG Zhijun, LIU Shengdong, LU Tuo, ZHANG Peng, ZHAO Ligui. Experimental study on the relationships of coal gas and seismic attributes[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2011, 39(5): 63-65,68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2011.05.015
    [7]WANG Liangqing, LIANG Ye, WU Qiong, TANG Huiming, ZHANG Xianshu. Estimation method of rockmass strength parameters based on elastic wave velocity ratio[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2010, 38(6): 37-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.06.008
    [8]WANG Kai-lin, YANG Sheng-qi, SU Cheng-dong. Study on the acoustic property of marble specimens with different grains[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2004, 32(2): 30-32.
    [9]ZHANG Jia-ming, WANG Ren, JIANG Guo-sheng. Experiment study on grouting soil uniaxial compression strength and its acoustic velocity[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2003, 31(5): 33-36.
    [10]Li Zhengbin, Pan Qiuming. THE SIGNAL MODEL IN TRANSIENT RAYLEIGH WAVE PROSPECTING AND THE CORRECTION OF ITS PHASE VELOCITY[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1996, 24(6): 57-60.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (130) PDF downloads (27) Cited by()
    Related

    Copyright of website design © Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration 陕ICP备05001372号-6 陕公网安备 61019002002193号

    Address: Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration, No.82 Jinye 1st Rd, High-Tech Zone, Xi'an City, Shaanxi, China

    Tel: 029-81778075 E-mail: ccrimtdzykt@vip.163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return