ZHAO Chunhu, SHANG Hongbo, JIN Dewu, WANG Hao, XU Shuanhai, WANG Xiaodong, ZHANG Weidong. Numerical simulation of coaxial heat transfer capacity of deep vertical wells[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(5): 174-181. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.05.021
Citation: ZHAO Chunhu, SHANG Hongbo, JIN Dewu, WANG Hao, XU Shuanhai, WANG Xiaodong, ZHANG Weidong. Numerical simulation of coaxial heat transfer capacity of deep vertical wells[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(5): 174-181. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.05.021

Numerical simulation of coaxial heat transfer capacity of deep vertical wells

Funds: 

Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Tiandi Science and Technology Co. Ltd.(2018-TD-MS069)

More Information
  • Received Date: February 24, 2020
  • Revised Date: July 03, 2020
  • Published Date: October 24, 2020
  • Aiming at the scientific evaluation of coaxial casing heat transfer of geothermal resources with medium burial depth(1 500-4 000 m), a rock-water coupled heat transfer model of a vertical single well was built based on the simulation platform of COMSOL Multiphysics software. Taking the stratigraphic and geothermal characteristics of Xi'an area as the simulation background, the heat transfer capacity of single well(3 500 m)casing under two different geothermal gradients(0.027℃/m and 0.030℃/m) and four flow velocities(0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 m/s) was calculated and analyzed. Meanwhile, the numerical models of group wells with five kinds of well spacing were established, and the variation law of outlet temperature of the central group wells with different well spacing was analyzed. The simulation results show that the greater the geothermal gradient, the bigger the temperature difference between the inlet and the outlet, and the larger the heat transfer per unit time and the heat transfer per unit length of borehole. The larger the inlet injection velocity, the smaller the temperature difference between the inlet and the outlet, and the larger the heat transfer per unit time and per unit length of the borehole, which indicating that the higher the geothermal gradient and the flow velocity, the higher the heat transfer efficiency is. Under the deep working condition of 3 500 m in Xi'an area, when the distance between adjacent geothermal wells is 30 m, it would ensure that the formation temperature will not interfere with each other. The conclusion in this paper would provide scientific reference for the development and utilization of the deep geothermal resources.
  • [1]
    高甫生. 雾霾天气、环境与能源-暖通空调行业的对策[J]. 暖通空调,2013,43(9):33-47.

    GAO Fusheng. Haze weather,environment and energy:The strategies of HVAC industry[J]. Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning,2013,43(9):33-47.
    [2]
    MAJURI P. Ground source heat pumps and environmental policy:The Finnish practitioner's point of view[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,139:740-749.
    [3]
    陈超,王永菲,任艳,等. 竖直U形地埋管换热器传热热阻计算方法比较[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,36(12):58-62.

    CHEN Chao,WANG Yongfei,REN Yan,et al. Comparison of vertical U-tube ground heat exchanger thermal resistance calculation methods[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences),2009,36(12):58-62.
    [4]
    黄光勤,卢军,陈鹏. 瞬态热流岩土热响应测试研究[J]. 太阳能学报,2013,34(10):1787-1794.

    HUANG Guangqin,LU Jun,CHEN Peng. Thermal response test of transient heating flux soil[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2013,34(10):1787-1794.
    [5]
    胡平放,康龙,江章宁,等. 地源热泵U型埋管换热影响因素的数值模拟与分析[J]. 流体机械,2009,37(3):64-68.

    HU Pingfang,KANG Long,JIANG Zhangning,et al. Simulation and analysis of the effect factor on the heat transfer in the U-tube of ground source heat pump[J]. Fluid Machinery,2009,37(3):64-68.
    [6]
    陈梅倩,万锐,李正浩,等. 竖直U型地埋管传热性能数值模拟[J]. 北京交通大学学报,2016,40(1):61-66.

    CHEN Meiqian,WAN Rui,LI Zhenghao,et al. Numerical simulation on heat transfer behavior of a ground vertical U-shaped tube[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University,2016,40(1):61-66.
    [7]
    郝文兰,陈宝明,云和明,等. U型垂直埋管非稳态换热的数值模拟与研究[J]. 山东建筑大学学报,2010,25(6):602-606.

    HAO Wenlan,CHEN Baoming,YUN Heming,et al. Numerical simulation of unsteady heat transfer of U-tube ground heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University,2010,25(6):602-606.
    [8]
    王瑾,李为,郭威,等. 竖直U形地埋管换热器热短路现象及换热性能研究[J]. 暖通空调,2014,44(2):89-94.

    WANG Jin,LI Wei,GUO Wei,et al. Thermal interference and heat transfer performance of vertical U-tube ground heat exchangers[J]. Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning,2014,44(2):89-94.
    [9]
    刘虎,晋华,邢述彦,等. 地下水渗流对地埋管换热器周围温度场的影响[J]. 水电能源科学,2012,30(12):117-119.

    LIU Hu,JIN Hua,XING Shuyan,et al. Influence of groundwater seepage on GHE temperature field[J]. Water Resources and Power,2012,30(12):117-119.
    [10]
    MEHRIZI A A,PORKHIAL S,BEZYAN B,et al. Energy pile foundation simulation for different configurations of ground source heat exchanger[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer,2016,70:105-114.
    [11]
    庞忠和,孔彦龙,庞菊梅,等. 雄安新区地热资源与开发利用研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2017,32(11):1224-1230.

    PANG Zhonghe,KONG Yanlong,PANG Jumei,et al. Geothermal resources and development in Xiong'an new area[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2017,32(11):1224-1230.
    [12]
    KONG Yanlong,PANG Zhonghe,PANG Jumei,et al. Stable isotopes of deep groundwater in the Xiongxian geothermal field[J]. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science,2017,17:512-515.
    [13]
    孔彦龙,陈超凡,邵亥冰,等. 深井换热技术原理及其换热量评估[J]. 地球物理学报,2017,60(12):4741-4752.

    KONG Yanlong,CHEN Chaofan,SHAO Haibing,et a1. Principle and capacity quantification of deep-borehole heat exchangers[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2017,60(12):4741-4752.
    [14]
    KONG Yanlong,PANG Zhonghe,SHAO Haibing,et al. Optimization of well doublet placement in geothermal reservoirs using numerical simulation and economic analysis[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2017,76(3):118.
    [15]
    张育平,黄少鹏,杨甫,等. 关中盆地西安凹陷深层地热U型对接井地温特征[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2019,31(6):54-61.

    ZHANG Yuping,HUANG Shaopeng,YANG Fu,et al. Geothermal features of two deep U-shape downhole heat exchangers in the Xi'an depression,Guanzhong basin[J]. Coal Geology of China,2019,31(6):54-61.
    [16]
    任虎俊. 水热型地热能同轴管换热技术研究-以河北省邯郸地区为例[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2018,30(6):105-108.

    REN Hujun. Study on hydrothermal type geothermal energy coaxial tube heat transfer technology:A case study of Handan area[J]. Coal Geology of China,2018,30(6):105-108.
    [17]
    BEIER R A,ACUNA J,MOGENSEN P,et al. Transient heat transfer in a coaxial borehole heat exchanger[J]. Geothermics,2014,51:470-482.
    [18]
    BEIER R A. Transient heat transfer in a U-tube borehole heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2014,62(1):256-266.
    [19]
    尚宏波,赵春虎,靳德武,等. 中深层地热单井换热数值计算[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(6):159-166.

    SHANG Hongbo,ZHAO Chunhu,JIN Dewu,et al. Numerical calculation of heat transfer in single medium-deep geothermal well[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2019,47(6):159-166.
    [20]
    孔祥言. 高等渗流力学[M]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2010.

    KONG Xiangyan. Advanced mechanics of fluids in porous media[M]. Hefei:University of Science and Technology of China Press,2010.
    [21]
    PIRNIA P,DUHAIME F,ETHIER Y,et al. ICY:An interface between COMSOL multiphysics and discrete element code YADE for the modelling of porous media[J]. Computers & Geosciences,2018,123:38-46.
    [22]
    孙红丽. 关中盆地地热资源赋存特征及成因模式研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2015.

    SUN Hongli. The bearing features and genetic model for geothermal resources in Guanzhong basin[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing),2015.
    [23]
    邓杰文,魏庆芃,张辉,等. 中深层地热源热泵供暖系统能耗和能效实测分析[J]. 暖通空调,2017,47(8):150-154.

    DENG Jiewen,WEI Qingpeng,ZHANG Hui,et a1. On-site measurement and analysis on energy consumption and energy efficiency ratio of medium-depth geothermal heat pump systems for space heating[J]. Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning,2017,47(8):150-154.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Gaofeng, LI Baolin, ZHANG Zhen, LIU Huan, GUAN Wenbo, SI Nian. Gas expansion energy of coals with different metamorphic degrees: Evolutionary characteristics and their implications for the outburst prediction[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2023, 51(10): 1-8. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0103
    [2]ZHANG Yu, LI Yong, WANG Yanbin, WANG Zhuangsen, ZHAO Shihu, HAN Wenlong. SAXS-based nano-scale pore structure characteristics of coals with different metamorphic degrees[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(6): 142-150. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.06.017
    [3]YANG Hongmin, LIANG Longhui. Influence of CO2 on the replacement effect of CH4 in coal of different metamorphic grade under isobaric diffusion[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(5): 55-59,65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.009
    [4]ZHANG Lusuo, GUAN Yingbin, LI Haimei, ZHANG Guobin, ZHAO Ping, LI Su, ZHENG Jian, CUI Sheng. Variety regularity of metamorphic coal of Longdong coalfield in Xingtai by X-ray diffraction method[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2010, 38(2): 1-4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.02.001
    [5]LI Xiao-ming, CAO Dai-yong, ZHAN Wen-feng. Elements distribution and effecting factors of high rank coals of different deformational-metamorphic types in Beihuaiyang area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2006, 34(6): 1-3.
    [6]LI Xiao-ming, CAO Dai-yong, ZHANG Shou-ren, XING Xiu-yun. Study of the XRD parameter evolution of coal of different metamorphism types[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2003, 31(3): 5-7.
    [7]TANG Fang-tou. The application of X radial analyze of coal in slip fault in Zhadu Mining Area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2002, 30(1): 1-3.
    [8]Wang Chao, Yu Bing, Song Aixia, Zhang Jing, Li Shuhua. METAMORPHIC COEFFICIENT,A NEW INDEX FOR METAMORPHIC DEGREE OF COAL[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1997, 25(2): 18-21.
    [9]Cao Yunxing, Zhang Yugui, Li Kaiqi, Hou Quanlin, Guo Deyong. TECTONIC COAL DYNA MOMETAMORPHISM AND EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1996, 24(4): 15-18.
    [10]Liu Jinzhong. CHARACTERISTICS OF FTIR,ESR,XRD OF THE COAL METAMORPHIZED BY SUB-VOCANICS[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1993, 21(5): 16-20.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 尹尚先,姚辉,梁满玉,吴威,连会青,侯恩科,赵鹏,张义安,王雄. 突水系数60年:面临困境及发展方向. 煤炭学报. 2025(01): 600-609 .
    2. 姚辉,尹慧超,梁满玉,尹尚先,侯恩科,连会青,夏向学,张金福,吴传实. 机器学习方法在矿井水防治理论体系研究中的应用思考. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(05): 107-117 . 本站查看
    3. 杨茹蕙,李小萌,王铁记. 基于IAHP-EWM博弈论的煤层底板突水影响因素研究. 煤炭与化工. 2024(07): 43-47+52 .
    4. 姚辉,尹慧超,尹尚先,侯恩科,毕梦,连会青,夏向学,梁满玉. 底板突水危险性评价研究进展. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(S1): 183-191 .
    5. 朱宗奎. 基于Lawrence风险公式的突水系数修正模型研究. 矿业安全与环保. 2023(03): 89-94 .
    6. 丁晓欣,种亚平,高静思,朱佳. “最后一公里”工程供水效果评价研究. 水利规划与设计. 2023(08): 50-54 .
    7. 穆渴心,冉栋刚,张平清,张璐,王茂鑫. 基于组合赋权秩和比的实验室安全管理评价模型构建. 实验室研究与探索. 2023(05): 314-319 .
    8. 代革联,吴佩凝,牛超,许珂,王峰,赵国杰,白丰源. 应用加权秩和比法评价底板突水危险性. 煤炭技术. 2023(09): 109-113 .
    9. 马洪斌,郝琨,齐洁莹,连政,刘祥,李苑红,申丹. 基于赋权与加权秩和比的变电设备状态评价. 电力大数据. 2023(05): 53-61 .
    10. 崔俊超,平宇,郝建卿,任君豪,孟建勇,王心义. 基于区间变权和未知测度理论的煤层底板突水危险性评价. 地下水. 2023(05): 1-6+25 .
    11. 安律宁,陈继福,董广铭,李玉兵. 基于层次聚类模糊综合评判的矿井突水危险性评价. 煤炭与化工. 2023(10): 49-56 .
    12. 王松松,代革联,牛超. 基于组合赋权法的煤层底板突水危险性研究. 能源与环保. 2023(11): 98-104+110 .
    13. 陈军涛,李文昕,薛峰,王凯,张呈祥,宋涛. 主客观组合赋权的TOPSIS-RSR注浆效果综合评价方法. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(S2): 191-199 .
    14. 方恩才,余国锋,赵一鸣. 张集煤矿厚煤层工作面底板灰岩突水监测预报研究. 煤炭科技. 2022(04): 116-121 .

    Other cited types(11)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (207) PDF downloads (32) Cited by(25)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return