Volume 45 Issue 4
Aug.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
WANG Jin, KANG Yongshang, JIANG Shanyu, ZHANG Bing, GU Jiaoyang. Difference of CBM development conditions in Shouyang and Shizhuang blocks, Qinshui basin[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(4): 56-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.04.010
Citation: WANG Jin, KANG Yongshang, JIANG Shanyu, ZHANG Bing, GU Jiaoyang. Difference of CBM development conditions in Shouyang and Shizhuang blocks, Qinshui basin[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(4): 56-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.04.010
shu

Difference of CBM development conditions in Shouyang and Shizhuang blocks, Qinshui basin

  • 1. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;

  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China;

  • 3. CNOOC China Limited, Unconventional Oil & Gas Branch, Beijing 100011, China;

  • 4. China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Ltd., Beijing 100011, China

Funds: 

National Science and Technology Major Project(2011ZX05042)

More Information
  • Received Date: October 24, 2016
  • Published Date: August 24, 2017
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Based on the geological data and drainage dynamic data in two blocks, this paper analyzes the causes of difference between the two blocks from three aspects including resources, fluid mobility and fracturing engineering conditions, discusses the key issues of CBM development of Shouyang block and gives some suggestions. The study shows that the resources and the fluid mobility of each coal seam in Shizhuang are wonderful, so Shizhuang block is suitable for CBM development. The resources of each coal seam in Shouyang block are weak but the ultimate recovery resources of multiple coal seams is up to 1.57×108 m3/km2 and the desorption potential is also satisfactory since desorption quantity index of each single seam is about 9 m3/t. What's more, the fluid mobility is beneficial to CBM development, the average value of permeability is 7.57×10-3 μm2, even though the adsorption time is more than 15 d. Compared with Shizhuang block, there are not only more sandstone aquifers with high permeability in coal measure strata in Shouyang block, but also the actual implementation of fracturing is bigger, so the fault and hydraulic fractures are easy to connect coal seam with aquifers. It is suggested that multiple coal seams developed together is a necessary way for Shouyang block. When it comes to select appropriate well horizon, it is crucial to avoid faults, take into account the lithological combination of coal roof and floor and optimize or control fracturing volume.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (26)
  • [1]
    叶建平,陆小霞. 我国煤层气产业发展现状和技术进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2016,44(1):24-28.

    YE Jianping,LU Xiaoxia. Development status and technical progress of China coalbed methane industry[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2016,44(1):24-28.
    [2]
    张培河,刘钰辉,王正喜,等. 基于生产数据分析的沁水盆地南部煤层气井产能控制地质因素研究[J]. 天然气地球科学,2011,22(5):909-914.

    ZHANG Peihe,LIU Yuhui,WANG Zhengxi,et al. Geological factors of production control of CBM well in south Qinshui basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(5):909-914.
    [3]
    DOU Fengke,KANG Yongshang,QIN Shaofeng,et al. The coalbed methane production potential method for optimization of wells location selection[J]. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China),2013,19(2):210-218.
    [4]
    孙粉锦,王勃,李梦溪,等. 沁水盆地南部煤层气富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油学报,2014,35(6):1070-1079.

    SUN Fenjin,WANG Bo,LI Mengxi,et al. Major geological factors controlling the enrichment and high yield of coalbed methane in the southern Qinshui basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1070-1079.
    [5]
    KANG Yongshang,YE Jianping,YUAN Chunlin,et al. Coalbed methane evaluation and development:An example from Qinshui basin in China[C]//MA Y Z,HOLDITCH S. A Handbook of Unconventional Oil & Gas. Elsevier,2016:475-494.
    [6]
    宋岩,柳少波,马行陟,等. 中高煤阶煤层气富集高产区形成模式与地质评价方法[J]. 地学前缘,2016,23(3):1-9.

    SONG Yan,LIU Shaobo,MA Xingzhi,et al. Research on formation model and geological evaluation method of the middle to high coal rank coalbed methane enrichment and high production area[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(3):1-9.
    [7]
    侯丁根,周效志. 黔西松河井田煤层气成藏特征及资源可采性研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2016,44(2):62-67.

    HOU Dinggen,ZHOU Xiaozhi. Research on reservoir forming characteristics and recoverability of CBM resources in Songhe mine field,west Guizhou[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2016,44(2):62-67.
    [8]
    张硕,张小东,李学文,等. 沁水盆地南部煤层气储层特征及可采性研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2015,27(11):9-13.

    ZHANG Shuo,ZHANG Xiaodong,LI Xuewen,et al. CBM reservoir features and recoverability study in southern Qinshui basin[J]. Coal Geology of China,2015,27(11):9-13.
    [9]
    张培河,张群,王宝玉,等. 煤层气可采性综合评价方法研究-以潘庄井田为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2006,34(1):21-25.

    ZHANG Peihe,ZHANG Qun,WANG Baoyu,et al. In-tegrated methods of CBM recoverability evaluation:A case study from Panzhuang mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2006,34(1):21-25.
    [10]
    范俊佳,琚宜文,侯泉林,等. 不同变质变形煤储层孔隙特征与煤层气可采性[J]. 地学前缘,2010,17(5):325-334.

    FAN Junjia,JU Yiwen,HOU Quanlin,et al. Pore structure characteristics of different metamorphic deformed coal reservoirs and its restriction on recovery of coalbed methane[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2010,17(5):325-334.
    [11]
    陈贞龙,汤达祯,许浩,等. 黔西滇东地区煤层气储层孔隙系统与可采性[J]. 煤炭学报,2010,35(增刊1):158-163.

    CHEN Zhenlong,TANG Dazhen,XU Hao,et al. The pore system properties of coalbed methane reservoirs and recovery in western Guizhou and eastern Yunnan[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(S1):158-163.
    [12]
    李五忠,田文广,陈刚,等. 不同煤阶煤层气选区评价参数的研究与应用[J]. 天然气工业,2010,30(6):45-47.

    LI Wuzhong,TIAN Wenguang,CHEN Gang,et al. Research and application of appraisal variables for the prioritizing of coalbed methane areas featured by different coal ranks[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(6):45-47.
    [13]
    孟召平,刘翠丽,纪懿明. 煤层气/页岩气开发地质条件及其对比分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2013,38(5):728-736.

    MENG Zhaoping,LIU Cuili,JI Yiming. Geological conditions of coalbed methane and shale gas exploitation and their comparison analysis[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(5):728-736.
    [14]
    PAUL G W. Simulating coalbed methane reservoirs[C]//SAULSBERRY J L,PAUL S,SCHRAUFNAGEL R A. A Guide to Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering. Gas Research Institute,1996:632-643.
    [15]
    丁安徐,龚月,叶建国. 贵州织金地区龙潭组煤层等温吸附特征研究及应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发,2011,1(3):76-80.

    DING Anxu,GONG Yue,YE Jianguo. Research and application of isothermal adsorption characteristics of the coal beds of Longtan Formation in Zhijin,Guizhou[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2011,1(3):76-80.
    [16]
    张培河,李贵红,李建武. 煤层气采收率预测方法评述[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2006,34(5):26-30.

    ZHANG Peihe,LI Guihong,LI Jianwu. The review on the predictive methodology of coalbed methane recovery efficiency[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2006,34(5):26-30.
    [17]
    朱宝存,唐书恒,张佳赞. 煤岩与顶底板岩石力学性质及对煤储层压裂的影响[J]. 煤炭学报,2009,34(6):756-760.

    ZHU Baocun,TANG Shuheng,ZHANG Jiazan. Mechanics characteristics of coal and its roof and floor rock and the effect of hydraulic fracturing on coal reservoir[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2009,34(6):756-760.
    [18]
    康永尚,张兵,鱼雪,等.沁水盆地寿阳区块煤层气排采动态成因机理及排采对策[J]. 天然气地球科学,2017,28(1):116-126.

    KANG Yongshang,ZHANG Bing,YU Xue,et al. Formation mechanism of well performance and CBM development strategy in Shouyang block,Qinshui basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(1):116-126.
    [19]
    孟召平,彭苏萍,傅继彤. 含煤岩系岩石力学性质控制因素探讨[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(1):102-106.

    MENG Zhaoping,PENG Suping,FU Jitong. Study on control factors of rock mechanics properties of coal bearing formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2002,21(1):102-106.
    [20]
    王金,康永尚,姜杉钰,等. 沁水盆地寿阳区块煤层气井产水差异性原因分析及有利区预测[J]. 天然气工业,2016,36(8):41-48.

    WANG Jin,KANG Yongshang,JIANG Shanyu,et al. Reasons for water production difference of CBM wells in Shouyang block,Qinshui basin,and prediction on favorable areas[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(8):41-48.
    [21]
    康永尚,陈晶,张兵,等. 沁水盆地寿阳勘探区煤层气井排采水源层识别[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(9):2263-2272.

    KANG Yongshang,CHEN Jing,ZHANG Bing,et al. Identification of aquifers influencing the drainage of coalbed methane wells in Shouyang exploration area,Qinshui basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(9):2263-2272.
    [22]
    SHAO Longyi,YANG Zhiyu,SHANG Xiaoxu,et al. Lithofacies paleogeography of the Carboniferous and Permian in the Qinshui basin,Shanxi Province,China[J]. Journal of Paleogeography,2015,4(4):387-413.
    [23]
    陆小霞,黄文辉,唐修义,等. 沁水盆地南部15号煤层顶板灰岩特征对煤层气开采的影响[J]. 现代地质,2012,26(3):518-526.

    LU Xiaoxia,HUANG Wenhui,TANG Xiuyi,et al. Impact of limestone of No.15 coal seam roof on the coal bed methane exploitation,south Qinshui basin[J]. Geoscience,2012,26(3):518-526.
    [24]
    卫明明,琚宜文. 沁水盆地南部煤层气田产出水地球化学特征及其来源[J]. 煤炭学报,2015,40(3):629-635.

    WEI Mingming,JU Yiwen. Chemical characteristics and origin of produced waters from coalbed gas field in the southern of Qinshui basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2015,40(3):629-635.
    [25]
    康永尚,王金,姜杉钰,等. 煤层气井排采动态主控地质因素分析[J]. 地质论评,2016,62(6):1511-1520.

    KANG Yongshang,WANG Jin,JIANG Shanyu,et al. Analysis on controlling geological factors influencing drainage performances of CBM wells[J]. Geological Review,2016,62(6):1511-1520.
    [26]
    姜杉钰,康永尚,张守仁,等. 沁水盆地柿庄区块煤层气井排采动态影响因素分析及开发对策研究[J]. 天然气地球科学,2016,27(6):1134-1142.

    JIANG Shanyu,KANG Yongshang,ZHANG Shouren,et al. Analysis on influencing factors of drainage dynamic of wells and CBM development strategy in Shizhuang block[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(6):1134-1142.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Baoxin, FU Xuehai, ZHANG Qinghui, ZHOU Baoyan, LIU Zheng. Adsorbability of shale in coal measures and its influencing factors[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(1): 56-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.01.008
    [2]LIU Zhimin, LIU Xigao, DO Yibo, ZHANG Jintao, WU Miao. Calculation method and analysis of influence factors of the grounding resistance in electrical measurement[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2015, 43(2): 96-100.105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2015.02.020
    [3]LIU Huibin. Soft floor deformation characteristics and analysis of influential factors in Binchang mining area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2013, 41(6): 58-60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2013.06.014
    [4]ZHAO Jun-feng, LIU Chi-yang, WANG Xiao-mei. The factors influencing the measurement results of vitrinite reflectance[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2004, 32(6): 15-18.
    [5]LI Jian-wu, BAI Gong-zheng, LEI Bao-lin, LI Jing, ZHAO Jun-feng. Adsorptive charateristics and controlling factors of coal seams in TU-Ha basin[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2001, 29(2): 30-32.
    [6]ZHOU Cheng-gang, GAO Jun-liang. Control factors of grouting soil[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2001, 29(1): 45-48.
    [7]Fan Limin, Yang Hongke. THE OCCURRENCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SHALLOW COAL SEAMS AND THEIR INFLUENCE FACTORS IN SHENBEI MINING DISTRICT[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1999, 27(3): 22-24.
    [8]Shi Longqing, Lou Huaqun. THE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE FLOOR WATER-RESISTING PROPERTY IN FEICHENG COAL FIELD[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1998, 26(2): 47-49.
    [9]Song Zhenjiang, Zhao Hua, Cheng Hongliang. THE FACTORS INFLUENCED ON THE PENETRATION TECHNIQUE IN COAL MINES[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1997, 25(5): 48-51.
    [10]Xia Yujing. INVESTIGATION DEPTH AND INFLUENCE FACTOR ANALYSIS OF STEADY STATE RAYLEIGH WAVE EXPLORATION[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1997, 25(2): 50-53.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (95) PDF downloads (20) Cited by()
    Related

    Copyright of website design © Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration 陕ICP备05001372号-6 陕公网安备 61019002002193号

    Address: Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration, No.82 Jinye 1st Rd, High-Tech Zone, Xi'an City, Shaanxi, China

    Tel: 029-81778075 E-mail: ccrimtdzykt@vip.163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return