JIAN Kuo, ZHANG Yugui, HE Shaopan, GAO Ranchao. The surface energy of methane adsorption of tectonic coal[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2014, 42(1): 31-34,39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2014.01.007
Citation: JIAN Kuo, ZHANG Yugui, HE Shaopan, GAO Ranchao. The surface energy of methane adsorption of tectonic coal[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2014, 42(1): 31-34,39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2014.01.007

The surface energy of methane adsorption of tectonic coal

More Information
  • Received Date: November 07, 2012
  • Available Online: October 26, 2021
  • The fundamental reason of coal adsorption difference is coal surface energy.In this paper,the effect which is from dynamic metamorphism on tectonic coal structure and components was analyzed.In the process of adsorption of methane,using methane adsorption isotherm experiments,we calculated the surface energy change of primary structure coal and tectonic coal at different temperatures,and causes of surface energy change of tectonic coal were analyzed from the perspective of dynamic metamorphism.The results show that the transformable effect which is from dynamic metamorphism on structure and components of tectonic coal is obvious,the micro pores structure of tectonic coal is more developed than symbiotic primary structure coal,and the tectonic coal has stronger adsorption capacity.The calculation results also show that,both the lower value of surface energy and adsorption methane capacity of tectonic coal are.larger than symbiotic primary structure coal with the increase of temperature and pressure.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHAO Tao, CUI Zhao, JIA Hailiang, YANG Guangyu. Characteristics of dynamic mode Ⅱ fracture of frozen saturated sandstones under varying low temperatures and loading rates[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2025, 53(4): 1-13. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.25.02.0106
    [2]CHEN Luwang, WU Minghui, HOU Xiaowei, HU Yongsheng, ZHANG Miao, CAI Xinyue, YIN Xiaoxi, SHI Xiaoping. Spatiotemporal evolutionary patterns of the hydrochemistry of Jurassic conglomerate aquifers under the influence of curtain walls[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2025, 53(1): 174-183. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.10.0633
    [3]ZHANG Kun, SANG Shuxun, LIU Changjiang. Simulation experiment on the changes of CO2 burial process in deep coal seam[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(5): 26-31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.004
    [4]LIU Yanjie, LIU Chao, MA Bing, GUO Jing. Acidification experiment for enhancing the permeability of coal reservoir[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(2): 46-49. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.02.009
    [5]LIN Yabing, MA Dongmin, LIU Yuhui, MA Wei, JIA Xuemei. Experiment of the influence of temperature on coalbed methane adsorption[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2012, 40(6): 24-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2012.06.006
    [6]LIU Hai-yan, WU Fa-quan, QI Sheng-wen, CHANG Zhong-hua, CUI Yong-jun. The dissolution process and the rock mass breakage of marlite slope in Three Gorges Reservoir Region[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2006, 34(4): 37-41.
    [7]ZHANG Hui. One of parameters reflecting coal reservoir permeability——block coal rate[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2001, 29(6): 21-22.
    [8]Sun Lijin, Liu Minglei, Shi Longqing. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GLIDING STRUCTURE AND WATER INRUSH FROM FLOOR[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1999, 27(6): 44-46.
    [9]Zhao Zhigen. REGRESSION ANALYSIS MODEL OF RELATIVE GAS EMISSION RATE OF COALBEDS WITH SAME LEVEL[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1998, 26(2): 35-37.
    [10]Zhang Yongxiang, Xue Yuqun, Cao Yuqing. RESEARCH OF THE REACTION-TRANSPORTATION MODEL CONTROLLED UNDER THE DISSOLUTION AND PRECIPITATION OF CARBONATE[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1996, 24(5): 32-36.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (170) PDF downloads (14) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return