XIAO Peng,WU Mingchuan,SHUANG Haiqing,et al. Occurrence law of coal seam gas under influence of normal fault zone in coal measures[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(10):16−25. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.02.0076
Citation: XIAO Peng,WU Mingchuan,SHUANG Haiqing,et al. Occurrence law of coal seam gas under influence of normal fault zone in coal measures[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(10):16−25. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.02.0076

Occurrence law of coal seam gas under influence of normal fault zone in coal measures

More Information
  • Received Date: February 13, 2022
  • Revised Date: June 27, 2022
  • Available Online: August 08, 2022
  • The coal measure fault zone generated by the superimposition of the polytropic movement and multiple structure has important effects on the coal seam gas occurrence. The method of combining the geologic analysis, COMSOL Multiphysics numerical simulation and field data monitoring was adopted to analyze the interaction relations between the stress distribution characteristics and faults of the normal fault zone in the coal measure, study the coal seam permeability variation characteristics influenced by the normal fault zone in the coal measure, and simulate the gas migration status and concentration distribution condition after the formation of the normal fault zone. The coal seam gas occurrence law was further analyzed and obtained based on the monitoring results of the gas content and the gas outflow. As indicated by the study result, the stress concentration of the coal measure fault zone was mainly distributed on the fault plane of the coal seam. The stress drop occurred at the intersections of rock strata, coal seams and fault planes. The coal seam permeability in the affected area of the coal measure fault zone was in the order of large to small: the fault plane、average value in the area、upper wall of the fault、lower wall of the fault. The coal seam gas concentration was decreased gradually with the simulation time. The gas concentration decrease rates of the internal graben, horst and step fault in the normal fault zone of the coal seam were slightly higher than those of the boundary fault blocks at the both sides, and the gas showed obvious accumulation characteristics in the faults and fault blocks and the boundary outside the normal fault zone. The gas content in the normal fault zone of the coal measure and the average volume fraction of the return gas during stoping were 2.592 1 m3/t and 0.224 0%. The average values at the both sides of the boundary outside the fault zone were 4.480 2 m3/t and 0.454 9%. Accordingly, the new gas-concentrated areas were formed at the both sides of the normal fault zone in the coal measure.

  • [1]
    张子敏. 瓦斯地质学[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 1992.
    [2]
    彭苏萍. 我国煤矿安全高效开采地质保障系统研究现状及展望[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(7):2331−2345.

    PENG Suping. Current status and prospects of research on geological assurance system for coal mine safe and high efficient mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(7):2331−2345.
    [3]
    舒龙勇,程远平,王亮,等. 地质因素对煤层瓦斯赋存影响的研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2011,21(2):121−125. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2011.02.021

    SHU Longyong,CHENG Yuanping,WANG Liang,et al. Research on influence of geological factors on gas storage in coal seam[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2011,21(2):121−125. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2011.02.021
    [4]
    孟凡彬. 煤系地层下的小断层识别影响因素探讨[J]. 工程地球物理学报,2019,16(3):259−265. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7940.2019.03.001

    MENG Fanbin. Discussion on factors affecting identification of small faults under coal measures strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics,2019,16(3):259−265. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7940.2019.03.001
    [5]
    孔胜利,杨洋,贾音,等. 煤层瓦斯赋存特征及其关键地质因素影响研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(7):53−58.

    KONG Shengli,YANG Yang,JIA Yin,et al. Study on occurrence characteristics of coal seam gas and its key geological factors[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(7):53−58.
    [6]
    蔺亚兵,秦勇,王兴,等. 彬长低阶煤高瓦斯矿区瓦斯地质及其涌出特征[J]. 煤炭学报,2019,44(7):2151−2158.

    LIN Yabing,QIN Yong,WANG Xing,et al. Geology and emission of mine gas in Binchang mining area with low rank coal and high mine gas[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2019,44(7):2151−2158.
    [7]
    CHEN Xiangjun,LI Liyang,YUAN Yu,et al. Effect and mechanism of geological structures on coal seam gas occurrence in Changping minefield[J]. Energy Science & Engineering,2020,8(1):104−115.
    [8]
    宋占全,魏国营. 薛湖井田小断层对煤与瓦斯突出的控制作用[J]. 煤矿安全,2017,48(12):153−156. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2017.12.041

    SONG Zhanquan,WEI Guoying. Control effect of small faults on coal and gas outburst in Xuehu mine[J]. Safety in Coal Mines,2017,48(12):153−156. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2017.12.041
    [9]
    倪小明,贾炳,朱明阳. 寺河矿正断层附近瓦斯涌出量变化规律研究[J]. 安全与环境学报,2012,12(6):193−197. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2012.06.042

    NI Xiaoming,JIA Bing,ZHU Mingyang. On the changing regularity of the gas emission due to the normal neighboring faults in Sihe coal mine[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2012,12(6):193−197. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2012.06.042
    [10]
    崔洪庆,姚念岗. 不渗透断层与瓦斯灾害防治[J]. 煤炭学报,2010,35(9):1486−1489. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2010.09.022

    CUI Hongqing,YAO Niangang. Impermeable faults and prevention of gas hazards[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(9):1486−1489. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2010.09.022
    [11]
    刘咸卫,曹运兴,刘瑞勋,等. 正断层两盘的瓦斯突出分布特征及其地质成因浅析[J]. 煤炭学报,2000,25(6):571−575. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2000.06.003

    LIU Xianwei,CAO Yunxing,LIU Ruixun,et al. Analysis on distribution features of gas outburst from two walls of normal fault and geological origin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2000,25(6):571−575. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2000.06.003
    [12]
    韩松林,赵亚娟,高琳,等. 瓦斯地质区划及瓦斯异常分析:以顺和煤矿二2煤层为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(11):150−156.

    HAN Songlin,ZHAO Yajuan,GAO Lin,et al. Gas anomaly analysis and gas geological division of No.22 coal seam in Shunhe coal mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(11):150−156.
    [13]
    孙长彦,杨宗楠,杨恒. 西山煤田山西组震积岩特征及其煤系气勘探开发意义[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(9):136−144. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.09.020

    SUN Changyan,YANG Zongnan,YANG Heng. Seismites characteristics and significance of exploration and development from coal measure gas of Shanxi Formation in Xishan coalfield[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(9):136−144. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.09.020
    [14]
    杨柏. 井震结合“一井多断”小断层特征研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版),2016,13(32):50−53. DOI: 10.16772/j.cnki.1673-1409.2016.32.009

    YANG Bai. Study on the characteristics of small fault with“multiple breakpoints in a well”in logging combined with seism[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition),2016,13(32):50−53. DOI: 10.16772/j.cnki.1673-1409.2016.32.009
    [15]
    肖晖,李建新,韩伟,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘渭北隆起中新生代构造抬升及演化[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2013,33(5):576−582. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9315.2013.05.014

    XIAO Hui,LI Jianxin,HAN Wei,et al. The tectonic uplift time and evolution characteristics of Weibei uplift in the south edge of Ordos basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2013,33(5):576−582. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9315.2013.05.014
    [16]
    翁剑桥,曾联波,吕文雅,等. 断层附近地应力扰动带宽度及其影响因素[J]. 地质力学学报,2020,26(1):39−47. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.004

    WENG Jianqiao,ZENG Lianbo,LYU Wenya,et al. Width of stress disturbed zone near fault and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2020,26(1):39−47. DOI: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.004
    [17]
    武强,朱斌,刘守强. 矿井断裂构造带滞后突水的流–固耦合模拟方法分析与滞后时间确定[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(1):93−104.

    WU Qiang,ZHU Bin,LIU Shouqiang. Flow–solid coupling simulation method analysis and time identification of lagging water–inrush near mine fault belt[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2011,30(1):93−104.
    [18]
    王怀勐,朱炎铭,李伍,等. 煤层气赋存的两大地质控制因素[J]. 煤炭学报,2011,36(7):1129−1134. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2011.07.005

    WANG Huaimeng,ZHU Yanming,LI Wu,et al. Two major geological control factors of occurrence characteristics of CBM[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2011,36(7):1129−1134. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2011.07.005
    [19]
    王璞,王成虎,杨汝华,等. 基于应力多边形与震源机制解的深部岩体应力状态预测方法初探[J]. 岩土力学,2019,40(11):4486−4496. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0404

    WANG Pu,WANG Chenghu,YANG Ruhua,et al. Preliminary investigation on the deep rock stresses prediction method based on stress polygon and focal mechanism solution[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2019,40(11):4486−4496. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0404
    [20]
    刘清泉,程远平,李伟,等. 深部低透气性首采层煤与瓦斯气固耦合模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(增刊1):2749−2758.

    LIU Qingquan,CHENG Yuanping,LI Wei,et al. Mathematical model of coupled gas flow and coal deformation process in low–permeability and first mined coal seam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2015,34(Sup.1):2749−2758.
    [21]
    程远平,雷杨. 构造煤和煤与瓦斯突出关系的研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(1):180−198. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg20.1539

    CHENG Yuanping,LEI Yang. Causality between tectonic coal and coal and gas outbursts[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(1):180−198. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.yg20.1539
    [22]
    中国煤炭工业协会. 煤层瓦斯含量井下直接测定方法: GB/T 23250—2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
    [23]
    魏国营,门金龙,贾安立,等. 基于上覆基岩特征的赵固一矿井田煤层瓦斯富集区的判识方法[J]. 煤炭学报,2012,37(8):1315−1319.

    WEI Guoying,MEN Jinlong,JIA Anli,et al. Gas enrichment area identification methods by the overlying bedrock characteristic for Zhaogu No.1 coal mine[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(8):1315−1319.
  • Related Articles

    [1]FANG Hongwei, WU Jianxun, HOU Zhenkun. A new instability criterion of double strength reduction method for slope[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(5): 173-178. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.05.024
    [2]WEI Qibing, LIU Zhibin, LU Hongqiang, GAO Junqi. Stability analysis of slope reinforcement of the broadening project of Laoshan road in Qingdao[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(2): 101-104,111. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.02.018
    [3]WANG Yu, SU Shengrui, YU Hongming. Yu Wang Bian slope stability analysis based on coupled analysis method[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2010, 38(5): 50-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.05.011
    [4]MOU Sheng-yuan, WANG Zheng-zhong. Hoek-Brown failure criterion superiority for rocky slop stability analysis[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2009, 37(3): 53-56. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2009.03.013
    [5]LI Rong-wei, HOU En-ke. Orthogonality analysis of sensibility on factors of slope stability in opencast coal mine[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2009, 37(1): 52-56.
    [6]LI Rong-wei, HOU En-ke, ZHAO Zhou, ZHANG Zhi-hua. The coupling application of methods for evaluating slope stability of open-pit[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2008, 36(3): 52-55.
    [7]FAN Wen, DENG Long-sheng, BAI Xiao-yu, YU Mao-hong. Application of unified strength theories to the stability of slope analysis[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2007, 35(1): 63-66.
    [8]WANG Gui-rong. Stability analysis on segment k207+690~830 slope of Huangling-Yan’an highway[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2006, 34(6): 40-43.
    [9]LI Ping, YANG She-qiang, LI Tong-lu, ZHANG Li-ping. Strength reduction FEM applied to landslide stability analysis[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2005, 33(5): 45-47.
    [10]WANG Bin, YANG Chang-bin, ZHANG Shi, WANG Liang-qing. Stability analysis of a reservoir slope with the method of FEM strength reduction[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2005, 33(4): 56-59.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 夏玉成,孙学阳,苗霖田,郭晨,杜荣军. 智能时代的矿井地质工作展望——矿井开采智能地质保障技术体系架构. 煤田地质与勘探. 2025(01): 64-76 . 本站查看
    2. 杨智强,魏中凯,李锐鹏. 渑池县地质灾害敏感因子分析及易发性评价. 粉煤灰综合利用. 2024(03): 86-90+96 .
    3. 陈刚,郝社锋,蒋波,喻永祥,车增光,刘汉湖,杨容浩. 基于机载LiDAR技术植被茂密区小型滑坡识别与评价. 自然资源遥感. 2024(03): 196-205 .
    4. 牛晨昊,焦润成,韩建锋,王晟宇,郭学飞,刘畅,韩玉成,宋国峰. 基于信息量-机器学习耦合模型的采煤沉陷区滑坡敏感性评价. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(09): 140-153 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (323) PDF downloads (41) Cited by(7)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return