LIU Yunliang, ZHANG Peihe. Analysis on production dynamic and main controlling factors of single coalbed methane (CBM) well in Liulin area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(2): 34-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.02.007
Citation: LIU Yunliang, ZHANG Peihe. Analysis on production dynamic and main controlling factors of single coalbed methane (CBM) well in Liulin area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(2): 34-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.02.007

Analysis on production dynamic and main controlling factors of single coalbed methane (CBM) well in Liulin area

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China(41402144)

More Information
  • Received Date: March 09, 2015
  • Available Online: October 22, 2021
  • Liulin area is one of the hot places of CBM exploration and development in China, and preliminarily realized the commercial CBM development. Based on the CBM well production data of Liulin area, the gas dynamic of CBM wells was analyzed, and according to the output the gas wells statistics were made, the proportion of the middle production wells is high, accounting for 42.9%, the high gas production wells is 28.6%, and the low and very low gas production wells is 28.5%. Analysis of the CBM wells drainage curve, three types of CBM wells production modes were summed up, they are single peak, peak-stable and low-peak-peak-stable. From the influence of the structure, gas content, permeability, thickness of coal seam, coal seam depth, hydrogeological conditions and other geological factors on CBM wells production capacity, the influence of various geological factors on gas wells productivity was analyzed, and the relationship among various factors and the productivity of CBM wells was set up Studies suggested that the high yield of CBM wells in Liulin area is not controlled by a single factor, but depends on the advantageously match of a variety of main controlling factors and combined action.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHOU Ze, YI Tongsheng, QIN Yong, ZHOU Yongfeng, WANG Lingxia, KONG Weimin. Exploring geological parameters sensitive to underground coal gasification[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(3): 24-36. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.08.0473
    [2]WANG Zhiwei, ZHANG Kai, WU Qunhu, ZHANG Benhua, YU Shina, ZHANG Zunxiang, WU Yanjia. A method for predicting fractures in carbonate reservoirs based on fracture identification-sensitive log-seismic parameter model[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2023, 51(6): 163-174. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.10.0819
    [3]QIN Yigen, YANG Genlan, XIE Jin, LIU Bangyu. Sensitivity analysis of disaster-pregnant environmental factors for slope geological hazards in Kaiyang County, Guizhou Province[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(4): 190-198. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.04.026
    [4]YANG Yanhui, MENG Zhaoping, ZHANG Jixing. Research on stress sensitivity of coal reservoir and a new method for its evaluation[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(1): 38-42,46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.01.007
    [5]WU Jing. Influence of reservoir factors on low-rank coalbed methane well production and sensitivity analysis[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2015, 43(5): 44-48. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2015.05.011
    [6]MA Xingzhi, SONG Yan, LIU Shaobo, TIAN Hua, ZHENG Yongping, HAO Jiaqing. Analysis on parameter sensibility during isothermal adsorption experiment of coal reservoir[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2014, 42(6): 34-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2014.06.007
    [7]LIN Xin, ZHANG Shicheng, ZHANG Jin, ZHANG Ping. Sensitivity evaluation experiment of Liulin CBM reservoir[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2011, 39(6): 28-31,35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2011.06.007
    [8]LU Yuan, YI Xiangyi, YANG Zhi, ZHANG Hao, GUAN Baoshang. Application of the finite element analysis in coal and rock stress-sensitivity[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2011, 39(2): 22-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2011.02.005
    [9]LI Rong-wei, HOU En-ke. Orthogonality analysis of sensibility on factors of slope stability in opencast coal mine[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2009, 37(1): 52-56.
    [10]TIAN Min, ZHAO Yong-jun, ZHUANSUN Peng-cheng. Application of grey system theory in prediction of coalbed methane content[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2008, 36(2): 24-27.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 吴见,张松航,贾腾飞,晁巍巍,彭文春,李世龙. 深部煤层钻孔保压取心流程分析及含气量测定方法. 石油实验地质. 2025(01): 163-172 .
    2. 何文渊,黄文松,崔泽宏,刘玲莉,段利江,赵一波. 澳大利亚苏拉特区块低煤阶煤层气有利区预测与高效开发策略. 石油与天然气地质. 2025(01): 31-46 .
    3. 申有义,王凯峰,唐书恒,张松航,郗兆栋,杨晓东. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测. 岩性油气藏. 2024(04): 98-108 .
    4. 刘同庆,宋玉龙,牟义,黄涛,汝亮,周绍辉,曹峰,孟国强. 基于Petrel的煤顶板三维地质模型及地应力模型构建. 煤矿安全. 2023(05): 100-105 .
    5. 李勇,陈祖国,徐建军,周加佳,苏善博,张震. 寺河井田3号煤层含气量三维建模. 科技和产业. 2023(22): 275-280 .
    6. 姜在炳,杨建超,李勇,庞涛. 基于三维地质建模技术的煤层气抽采效果评价——以晋城寺河煤矿为例. 煤田地质与勘探. 2022(02): 55-64 . 本站查看
    7. 高连平,宋培娟,王庄. 基于三维激光特征二次匹配的室外景观建模方法. 应用激光. 2022(03): 147-153 .
    8. 郭广山,郭建宏,孙立春,刘丽芳,田永净. 基于随机森林算法的煤层含气量三维精细建模. 中国海上油气. 2022(04): 156-163 .
    9. 徐冬生. 邢台市任泽区地热资源开发利用研究. 中国煤炭地质. 2022(S2): 66-70 .
    10. 韩明辉,杨雪,胡海洋. 多薄煤层气藏三维地质建模技术及其应用——以黔西地区攀枝花煤矿为例. 天然气技术与经济. 2022(06): 1-8 .
    11. 刘冰,张松航,唐书恒,王鹏飞,翟佳宇,纪朝琪. 无越流补给含水层对煤层气排采影响的数值模拟. 煤田地质与勘探. 2021(02): 43-53 . 本站查看
    12. 宣涛,王文升,刘灵童,李建荣,秦鹏. 不连续、薄互层煤层气地质建模技术——以澳大利亚苏拉特盆地为例. 中国煤炭地质. 2021(06): 31-36+68 .
    13. 熊幸,韩文龙,赵石虎. 基于灰色关联的沁南柿庄地区含气量主控因素分析. 煤炭技术. 2021(07): 93-97 .
    14. 刘同庆. 煤质工业分析测井解释及三维建模研究. 煤炭技术. 2021(09): 71-75 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (125) PDF downloads (17) Cited by(16)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return