LIU Zhimin, LIU Xigao, DO Yibo, ZHANG Jintao, WU Miao. Calculation method and analysis of influence factors of the grounding resistance in electrical measurement[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2015, 43(2): 96-100.105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2015.02.020
Citation: LIU Zhimin, LIU Xigao, DO Yibo, ZHANG Jintao, WU Miao. Calculation method and analysis of influence factors of the grounding resistance in electrical measurement[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2015, 43(2): 96-100.105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2015.02.020

Calculation method and analysis of influence factors of the grounding resistance in electrical measurement

More Information
  • Received Date: October 22, 2013
  • Available Online: October 21, 2021
  • The grounding resistance must be reasonably calculated and reduced in order to improve the observation accuracy and quality, enhance the immunity of electromagnetic coupling when using electrical measurement. It can be reckoned according to the current field property and the conductor resistance definition. Through using MATLAB software, this paper simulates and analyzes the grounding resistance changes with the electrode radius, the buried depth and the covered distance by the soil from the rod electrode surface so as to determine its main size. Since the electrode size is generally relatively fixed, the methods of reducing the grounding resistance are mainly through reducing soil resistivity near the electrode and paralleling the grounding electrodes. Through the simulation analysis of the grounding resistance variation with the covered radius of replacement soil and the coefficient of assembling and shielding effect variation with the electrode spacing, we can draw the conclusion that the covered radius of replacement soil is taken within the range of 100~150 cm and the electrode spacing is twice greater than that of the buried depth. Now the grounding effect is the best.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HAN Yongliang, WANG Kaipeng, WANG Yijie, GOU Li, YANG Yanbin, LEI Yanzi, WU Fangli, SHEN Hao. Influencing patterns of multiple factors on the heat transfer performance of moderately deep geothermal wells[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(1): 104-116. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.11.0746
    [2]WANG Yaoming, YE Genfei, ZHAOYongzhe, GAO Ke, LIU Weiwei, DUAN Huijun. Principle of a self-protective sealing device for MWD and its influencing factors[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2022, 50(4): 153-158. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.11.0668
    [3]CHEN Gang, ZHANG Jiguan, LI Quanxin, LIU Zhiyi. Influential factors of the electromagnetic wave instrument while drilling in coal seam horizontal wells and resistivity simulation calculation[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2022, 50(1): 45-51. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.10.0595
    [4]CHANG Xiulin, YANG Hua, XIE Jian. Influencing factors and calculation method of the height of two zones in Wugou coal mine, Huaibei mining area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(S1): 43-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.S1.008
    [5]XUE Haifei, ZHU Guanghui, WANG Wei, LU Xiaoxia, WANG Minghao, WANG Yanbin. Analysis and application of key influencing factors of CBM well fracturing effects in Shizhuang area, Qinshui basin[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(4): 76-81. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.04.012
    [6]ZHAN Wenfeng, WU Yuliang, LI Wen. Simulation and analysis of electric field distribution and its influence factors in coal mine direct current method[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(1): 139-147. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.024
    [7]HUANG Hui, JIA Haibin, HAN Biwu, ZHU Changhuai, LIU Kesheng. Analysis of influencing factors of additional stress of deformation and failure induced by non-mining disturbance in shaft[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2014, 42(1): 40-44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2014.01.009
    [8]PAN Dong-zi, LI Ying, HUANG Zheng-hua. Analysis of pile-soil interaction by computer simulation[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2004, 32(4): 44-47.
    [9]LI Qian-gui, KANG Yi-li, LUO Ping-ya. Analysis of the factors affecting processes of CBM desorption, diffusion and percolation[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2003, 31(4): 26-29.
    [10]Xia Yujing. INVESTIGATION DEPTH AND INFLUENCE FACTOR ANALYSIS OF STEADY STATE RAYLEIGH WAVE EXPLORATION[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1997, 25(2): 50-53.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (82) PDF downloads (6) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return