LI Xin-hu. Lithology identification methods contrast based on support vector machines at different well logging parameter[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2007, 35(3): 72-76,80.
Citation: LI Xin-hu. Lithology identification methods contrast based on support vector machines at different well logging parameter[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2007, 35(3): 72-76,80.

Lithology identification methods contrast based on support vector machines at different well logging parameter

More Information
  • Received Date: September 11, 2006
  • Available Online: March 10, 2023
  • To finding the suitable well logging parameter set can use lithology identification through collecting the different well logging parameter set and contrasting the lithology identification results based on one against all support vector machines (SVM) and collected parameter set from well logging. Based on the coring well and well logging data, according to three methods, including M-N value, curve superposition and curve characteristic value, which are often be used on lithology identification, three different well logging curve parameter sets were collected, joining with SVM, lithology identification was fulfilled, after that, to selecting the best well logging parameter set that suitable to used on lithology identification according to error minimum principle through contrasting the results.Two of three different parameter sets indicated the error minimum characteristic on the process, those are curve superposition value and curve characteristic value.The parameter sets of curve superposition value and curve characteristic value methods can be the preferable fundamental data to used on lithology identification from well logging.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XIN Kai, JI Changjiang, XIAO Chun. Characteristics and monitoring method of the trajectory of the radial CBM well[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(6): 130-137. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.018
    [2]ZHANG Biao, ZHANG Suian, DONG Yintao, SUN Yanming, DU Yao. Friction loss calculation and wellhead pressure prediction in CBM radial drilling[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(4): 170-174. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.04.030
    [3]JIANG Chanjun, WANG Youxue, LI Chuan, ZENG Gaofu, YUN Peng. Numerical solution of the acoustic wave equation using meshless method with radial basis functions[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(5): 136-141. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.05.026
    [4]ZHU Xi'an, LI Feilong. A comparative study of the translation algorithm and kernel function algorithm for the large fixed loop[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(3): 120-123,127. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.03.023
    [5]XU Dongjing, SHI Longqing, QIU Mei, JING Xing, SUN Qi. Prediction of remained pillar against water-inrush from fault by using BP and RBF neural networks[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2013, 41(4): 66-69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2013.04.016
    [6]NIE Ailan. VSP wave fields separation using radial median filtering method[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2011, 39(5): 69-71,75. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2011.05.017
    [7]DING Wei-hua, WU Yan-qing, CAO Guang-zhu, PU Yi-bin. The CT image analysis on the soft rock deformation and damage process under triaxial condition[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2003, 31(3): 32-35.
    [8]GUO Jianqing, LI Yunfeng, WANG Hongsheng. THE INVERSE FUNCTION METHOD FOR ANALYZING THE DATA OF QUASI STEADY RADIAL DISPERSION TEST[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2000, 28(6): 36-39.
    [9]GUO Ai-huang. AUTOMATIC FORMATION DIVISION AND LITHOLOGIC INTERpRETATION BY LOGGING USING COMpUTER[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1998, 26(5): 58-62.
    [10]LI Chao-feng, YU Zhi-wei, HAN Bao-ping. THE ESTIMATION OF WATER YIELD OF HONGYAN COAL MINE WITH KERNEL FUNCTION[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1998, 26(5): 41-44.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (30) PDF downloads (1) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return