Volume 49 Issue 3
Jun.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
CHEN Yuexia, CHU Tingxiang, CHEN Peng, TANG Yang. Quantitative study of 3D numerical simulation on optimizing borehole layout spacing of gas drainage[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(3): 78-84, 94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.03.010
Citation: CHEN Yuexia, CHU Tingxiang, CHEN Peng, TANG Yang. Quantitative study of 3D numerical simulation on optimizing borehole layout spacing of gas drainage[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(3): 78-84, 94. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.03.010
shu

Quantitative study of 3D numerical simulation on optimizing borehole layout spacing of gas drainage

  • 1.

    School of Emergency Technology and Management, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Langfang 065201, China

  • 2.

    School of Safety Supervision, North China Institute of Science and Technology, Langfang 065201, China

  • 3.

    School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing 402160, China

More Information
  • Received Date: October 23, 2020
  • Revised Date: December 26, 2020
  • Published Date: June 24, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • In order to optimize the spacing of boreholes and realize efficient drainage, based on the fluid solid coupling model, a three-dimensional geometric model was established to make it closer to the field reality, the gas drainage processes of a coal mine with different borehole spacing were simulated using COMSOL software. The results show that: the effective drainage area was visualized by the three-dimensional diagram of the isobaric surface with gas pressure of 0.74 MPa, and the influence of borehole spacing on the extraction efficiency was discussed. The results show that: the effective extraction radius is about 1.5 m during gas extraction with single borehole at 120 days; when the borehole spacing d was 5 m during gas extraction with multiple boreholes at 120 days, the isobaric surface with gas pressure of 0.74 MPa was approximately cylindrical around all the boreholes, but it was sunken to the interior(there is a blanking zone); when the borehole spacing were 2.1 m, 3 m, 4 m, 5 m and 6 m respectively, the order of the volumes of the effective drainage area V changed with the growth of time; at 120 days, the order was Vd=5 m>Vd=4 m>Vd=3 m>Vd=2.1 m>Vd=6 m. According to the three-dimensional diagram of gas pressure isobaric surface and the order of effective drainage area volumes, the optimal borehole spacing is determined to be 4 m. In this paper, a numerical investigation method for borehole spacing based on effective extraction radius, superposition effect, shape of isobaric surface of three-dimension of gas pressure and volume of effective extraction area was presented, providing reference for optimizing layout of borehole spacing in underground coal mines.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (25)
  • [1]
    ZHANG Chaolin, WANG Enyuan, XU Jiang, et al. A new method for coal and gas outburst prediction and prevention based on the fragmentation of ejected coal[J]. Fuel, 2021, 287: 119493. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119493
    [2]
    YANG Chunli, LI Xiangchun, REN Yanbin, et al. Statistical analysis and countermeasures of gas explosion accident in coal mines[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 84: 166-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.422
    [3]
    SHI Juntai, WANG Shan, WANG Ke, et al. An accurate method for permeability evaluation of undersaturatedcoalbed methane reservoirs using early dewatering data[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2019, 202: 147-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2018.12.008
    [4]
    王晶, 姚团琪, 程斌. 基于煤矿"先抽后建"及资源开发的煤层气地面井位抽采部署及应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2019, 47(4): 28-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.04.005

    WANG Jing, YAO Tuanqi, CHENG Bin. Research and application of CBM surface extraction based on coal mine with "gas drainage first, construction later" and resource development[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2019, 47(4): 28-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.04.005
    [5]
    方佳伟, 韩保山, 周加佳, 等. 基于工作面全覆盖的地面瓦斯高效抽采模式研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(3): 81-85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.03.012

    FANG Jiawei, HAN Baoshan, ZHOU Jiajia, et al. Surface efficient gas extraction mode based on full coverage of working face[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2020, 48(3): 81-85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.03.012
    [6]
    刘永茜, 张书林, 舒龙勇. 吸附-解吸状态下煤层气运移机制[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2019, 47(4): 12-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.04.003

    LIU Yongqian, ZHANG Shulin, SHU Longyong. Coalbed methane migration mechanism under adsorption-desorption condition in coal[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2019, 47(4): 12-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.04.003
    [7]
    李宏, 马金魁. 顶板大直径定向长钻孔参数优化与优势分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.TD.20200212.2018.008.html.

    LI Hong, MA Jinkui. Parameter optimization and advantage analysis of large diameter directional long hole in roof[J]. Coal Science and Technology. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2402.TD.20200212.2018.008.html
    [8]
    齐黎明, 祁明, 陈学习. 抽采钻孔周围煤层瓦斯压力分布理论分析及应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 102-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK201807017.htm

    QI Liming, QI Ming, CHEN Xuexi. Theoretical analysis of coal seam gas pressure distribution around drainage hole and its application[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(7): 102-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK201807017.htm
    [9]
    LIU Zhengdong, CHENG Yuanping, JIANG Jingyu, et al. Interactions between coal seam gas drainage boreholes and the impact of such on borehole patterns[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 38: 597-607. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.01.015
    [10]
    李波, 孙东辉, 张路路. 煤矿顺层钻孔瓦斯抽采合理布孔间距研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(8): 121-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201608021.htm

    LI Bo, SUN Donghui, ZHANG Lulu. Study on rational space between gas drainage boreholes passing through seam in coal mine[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016, 44(8): 121-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201608021.htm
    [11]
    王兆丰, 李炎涛, 夏会辉, 等. 基于COMOSOL的顺层钻孔有效抽采半径的数值模拟[J]. 煤矿安全, 2012, 43(10): 4-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MKAQ201210001.htm

    WANG Zhaofeng, LI Yantao, XIA Huihui, et al. Numerical simulation on effective drainage radius of drill hole along coal seam based on COMSOL[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(10): 4-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MKAQ201210001.htm
    [12]
    马耕, 苏现波, 魏庆喜. 基于瓦斯流态的抽放半径确定方法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2009, 34(4): 501-504. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2009.04.014

    MA Geng, SU Xianbo, WEI Qingxi. The determination method of coal gas drainage radius based on methane flow state[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34(4): 501-504. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2009.04.014
    [13]
    刘三钧, 马耕, 卢杰, 等. 基于瓦斯含量的相对压力测定有效半径技术[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(10): 1715-1719. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201110020.htm

    LIU Sanjun, MA Geng, LU Jie, et al. Relative pressure determination technology for effective radius found on gas content[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011, 36(10): 1715-1719. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201110020.htm
    [14]
    郝富昌, 刘明举, 孙丽娟. 基于多物理场耦合的瓦斯抽放半径确定方法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(增刊1): 106-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB2013S1018.htm

    HAO Fuchang, LIU Mingju, SUN Lijuan. Determination method of gas drainage radius based on multi-physics coupling[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(Sup. 1): 106-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB2013S1018.htm
    [15]
    郝富昌, 刘明举, 孙丽娟. 瓦斯抽采半径确定方法的比较及存在问题研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2012, 40(12): 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201212014.htm

    HAO Fuchang, LIU Mingju, SUN Lijuan. Study on comparison of methods to determine gas drainage radius and existed problems[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2012, 40(12): 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201212014.htm
    [16]
    梁冰, 袁欣鹏, 孙维吉, 等. 分组测压确定瓦斯有效抽采半径试验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(1): 132-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL201301024.htm

    LIANG Bing, YUAN Xinpeng, SUN Weiji, et al. Grouped pressure test to determine effective gas drainage radius[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2013, 30(1): 132-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KSYL201301024.htm
    [17]
    李润芝, 梁冰, 孙维吉, 等. 顺层钻孔瓦斯抽采半径及布孔间距试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(10): 133-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK201610026.htm

    LI Runzhi, LIANG Bing, SUN Weiji, et al. Experimental study on both gas drainage radius and bedding borehole space[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(10): 133-138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZAQK201610026.htm
    [18]
    林柏泉, 宋浩然, 杨威, 等. 基于煤体各向异性的煤层瓦斯有效抽采区域研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(6): 139-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201906021.htm

    LIN Baiquan, SONG Haoran, YANG Wei, et al. Study on effective gas drainage area based on anisotropic coal seam[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(6): 139-145. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTKJ201906021.htm
    [19]
    ZHANG Chaolin, XU Jiang, PENG Shoujian, et al. Experimental study of drainage radius considering borehole interaction based on 3D monitoring of gas pressure in coal[J]. Fuel, 2019, 239: 955-963. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236118319884
    [20]
    许江, 宋肖徵, 彭守建, 等. 顺层钻孔布置间距对煤层瓦斯抽采效果影响的物理模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4581-4589. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201912004.htm

    XU Jiang, SONG Xiaozheng, PENG Shoujian, et al. Physical simulation experiment on influence of borehole spacing along the seam on effect of gas drainage[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4581-4589. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTLX201912004.htm
    [21]
    XIA Tongqiang, GAO Feng, KANG Jianhong, et al. A fully coupling coal-gas model associated with inertia and slip effects for CBM migration[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(7): 582. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-5378-y
    [22]
    ZHANG Hongbin, LIU Jishan, ELSWORTH D. How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: A new FE model[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2008, 45(8): 1226-1236. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160907001876
    [23]
    PALMER I, MANSOORI J. How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: A new model[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1998, 1(6): 539-544. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/250089489_How_Permeability_Depends_on_Stress_and_Pore_Pressure_in_Coalbeds_A_New_Model
    [24]
    CHEN Yuexia, XU Jiang, CHU Tingxiang, et al. The evolution of parameters during CBM drainage in different regions[J], Transport in Porous Media, 2017, 120(113): 83-100. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-017-0910-4
    [25]
    CHEN Yuexia, XU Jiang, PENG Shoujian, et al. A gas-solid-liquid coupling model of coal seams and the optimization of gas drainage boreholes[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(3): 560. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/doaj/19961073/2018/00000011/00000003/art00081
    • Related Articles

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(22)

    1. 蔡峰. 王家岭煤矿综放工作面上覆岩层运动规律及卸压区瓦斯抽采试验研究. 中国煤炭. 2024(01): 42-51 .
    2. 王杰峰，马严良，冯自豪. 基于叶脉仿生的多分支钻孔瓦斯抽采数值分析研究. 山西能源学院学报. 2024(01): 35-37 .
    3. 闫沁阳. 大孔径钻孔在掘进面瓦斯治理的实践应用. 煤. 2024(04): 47-50 .
    4. 段会军. 破碎松软复合煤体高效螺旋钻进技术试验研究. 能源与环保. 2024(04): 228-233+242 .
    5. 宋昱播. 复杂软弱煤层条件下高转速大扭矩钻探装备设计及试验研究. 煤矿安全. 2024(06): 200-205 .
    6. 陈明义，刘惠族，徐飞，田富超，陈晓昀. 基于响应面法的煤体有效抽采半径多因素交互作用. 科学技术与工程. 2024(19): 8036-8044 .
    7. 王方田，李哲，张村，何东升，张洋. 高瓦斯煤层大直径钻孔卸压增透瓦斯渗流时空演化机理. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(S1): 47-61 .
    8. 李定启，张浩海. 五阳煤矿松软煤层定向水射流卸压增透技术研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2024(09): 116-122 .
    9. 潘吉成. 基于三维流固耦合模型的煤层瓦斯有效抽采半径研究. 中国煤炭. 2024(S1): 128-134 .
    10. 谢波，梁帮治，杨强，段雨安. 地层特征重构下的气井射孔位置回归优化. 人工智能科学与工程. 2024(04): 52-59 .
    11. 刘虎. 基于流固耦合模型瓦斯抽采钻孔参数优化研究. 中国矿山工程. 2023(01): 54-59 .
    12. 王登科，唐家豪，魏建平，位乐，吴晶，袁明羽，庞晓非，郭玉杰. 煤层瓦斯多机制流固耦合模型与瓦斯抽采数值模拟分析. 煤炭学报. 2023(02): 763-775 .
    13. 段林川，罗文柯，张大伟，周加庆，唐建华. 煤层瓦斯有效抽采半径与布孔间距的数值模拟. 矿业工程研究. 2023(01): 36-41 .
    14. 张云，刘永孜，曹胜根，来兴平，刘嘉，张雷铭，童亮，何伟. 短壁块段式充填采煤矸石充填材料重金属离子“下行”迁移规律及控制技术. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2023(02): 284-294 .
    15. 薛俊华，肖健，杜轩宏，石钰. 我国煤矿保护层开采卸压瓦斯抽采现状及发展趋势. 煤田地质与勘探. 2023(06): 50-61 . 本站查看
    16. 于丽雅，张宗良. 高瓦斯厚煤层本煤层预抽钻孔布置优化研究. 煤炭工程. 2023(07): 78-83 .
    17. 范红伟，杨涛. 注热升温条件下煤体瓦斯解吸规律研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2023(10): 166-173 .
    18. 牛金明，李金华. 司马煤矿3号煤层瓦斯抽采半径优化与实践. 煤. 2023(12): 1-5 .
    19. 李全贵，邓羿泽，胡千庭，张跃兵，宋明洋，刘继川，石佳林. 煤层水力压裂应力与裂隙演化的细观规律. 煤田地质与勘探. 2022(06): 32-40 . 本站查看
    20. 李迎喜. 复杂软弱煤层条件下高速螺旋复合钻进技术研究及实践. 煤矿安全. 2022(08): 87-93 .
    21. 王昊，张飞，王帅，郝勇浙. 各向异性对煤层瓦斯运移及抽采钻孔布置的影响. 矿业研究与开发. 2022(12): 141-146 .
    22. 崔广永. 基于孔-裂隙双重介质模型的有效抽采半径应用研究. 山西煤炭. 2022(04): 33-39 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (201) PDF downloads (34) Cited by(31)
    Related

    Copyright of website design © Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration 陕ICP备05001372号-6 陕公网安备 61019002002193号

    Address: Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration, No.82 Jinye 1st Rd, High-Tech Zone, Xi'an City, Shaanxi, China

    Tel: 029-81778075 E-mail: ccrimtdzykt@vip.163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return