LYU Yuguang, LIU Baokai, ZHAO Baofeng, LYU Wenqing, HAN Gang, WANG Yongbao. Hydrogeological characteristics and danger-solving mining of Jurassic Baotashan sandstone—A case study in New Shanghai No.1 coal mine[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(6): 170-178. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.023
Citation: LYU Yuguang, LIU Baokai, ZHAO Baofeng, LYU Wenqing, HAN Gang, WANG Yongbao. Hydrogeological characteristics and danger-solving mining of Jurassic Baotashan sandstone—A case study in New Shanghai No.1 coal mine[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(6): 170-178. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.023

Hydrogeological characteristics and danger-solving mining of Jurassic Baotashan sandstone—A case study in New Shanghai No.1 coal mine

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China(41807221);Science and Technology Plan Funding Project of Ordos City in 2019

More Information
  • Received Date: June 22, 2020
  • Revised Date: September 21, 2020
  • Published Date: December 24, 2020
  • The western mining area is an important energy strategic base in China. The Jurassic coalfields have many mineable coal seams and rich resources. The middle and lower coal seams are seriously threatened by the "Baotashan sandstone" aquifer. However, the research on this aquifer is few and the data is scarce in China. Taking the "11·25" water inrush hazard of New Shanghai No.1 coal mine as an example, the extended drainage drilling, supplementary hydrogeological exploration and underground water drainage test were carried out. It was found that the aquifer was characterized by complex sedimentary structure, uneven water-rich, abundant static reserves, high water head, large water pressure and easy drainage. SEM showed that the sandstone is of argillaceous cementation, massive structure, and endogenous pore development. Taking the total thickness of sandstone, the ratio of sand to land, the unit water inflow and the permeability coefficient as the main controlling factors, the law of water-rich property of the aquifer was analyzed. It was estimated that under normal conditions, the water inflow is 1 200.7 m3/h and the maximum water inflow is 1 860.8 m3/h, which excess the capacity of mine drainage. Based on the analysis of the boundary conditions of hydrogeological units, a three-dimensional numerical model of unsteady seepage field was established by Visual MODFLOW, and the crisis-solving effects of four drainage stages were simulated, the danger of water inrush from 18 coal seam in one district could be relieved.
  • [1]
    吕玉广,李宏杰,夏宇君,等. 基于多类型四双法的煤层顶板突水预测评价研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(9):219-228.

    LYU Yuguang,LI Hognjie,XIA Yujun,et al. Prediction and evaluation study on coal seam roof water inrush based on multi-type four-double method[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(9):219-228.
    [2]
    王大纯,张人权,史毅虹,等.水文地质学基础[M].北京:地质出版社,1995:106-107.

    WANG Dachun,ZHANG Renquan,SHI Yihong,et al. General Hydrogeology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1995:106-107.
    [3]
    王洋,武强,丁湘,等. 深埋侏罗系煤层顶板水害源头防控关键技术[J]. 煤炭学报,2019,44(8):2449-2459.

    WANG Yang,WU Qiang,DING Xiang,et al. Key technologies for prevention and control of roof water disaster at sources in deep Jurassic seams[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2019,44(8):2449-2459.
    [4]
    赵宝峰. 基于含水层沉积和构造特征的富水性分区[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2015,27(4):30-34.

    ZHAO Baofeng. Water yield property zoning based on aquifer sedimentary and structural features[J]. Coal Geology of China,2015,27(4):30-34.
    [5]
    郭小铭,董书宁. 深埋煤层开采顶板基岩含水层渗流规律及保水技术[J]. 煤炭学报,2019,44(3):805-812.

    GUO Xiaoming,DONG Shuning. Seepage law of bedrock aquifer and water-preserved mining technology in deep coal seam mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2019,44(3):805-812.
    [6]
    张东升,李文平,来兴平,等. 我国西北煤炭开采中的水资源保护基础理论研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(1):36-43.

    ZHANG Dongsheng,LI Wenping,LAI Xingping,et al. Development on basic theory of water protection during coal mining in northwest of China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(1):36-43.
    [7]
    王海军,马良. 陕北侏罗纪煤田三角洲平原沉积环境及其岩石力学特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(3):61-69.

    WANG Haijun,MA Liang. Study on sediment environment and rock mechanics characteristics of the delta plain of Jurassic coalfield in northern Shaanxi[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2019,47(3):61-69.
    [8]
    李东,刘生优,张光德,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部典型顶板水害特征及其防治技术[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(12):3249-3254.

    LI Dong,LIU Shengyou,ZHANG Guangde,et al. Typical roof water disasters and its prevention & control technology in the north of Ordos basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(12):3249-3254.
    [9]
    齐跃明,李民族,许进鹏. 复杂地质条件下的突水疏放试验及水文地质意义[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2016,33(1):140-145.

    QI Yueming,LI Minzu,XU Jinpeng. Draining test of mine water inrush under complex geological conditions and its hydrogeological significance[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2016,33(1):140-145.
    [10]
    王双明,吕道生,佟英梅,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地聚煤规律及煤炭资源评价[M]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社,1996.

    WANG Shuangming,LYU Daosheng,TONG Yingmei,et al. Coal accumulation and coal resource evaluation of Ordos basin[M]. Beijing:China Coal Industry Publishing House,1996.
    [11]
    吕玉广,齐东合. 顶板突(涌)水危险性"双图"评价技术与应用:以鄂尔多斯盆地西缘新上海一号煤矿为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2016,44(5):108-112.

    LYU Yuguang,QI Donghe. Technique based on "double maps" for assessment of water inrush from roof aquifer and its application:With New Shanghai No.1 coal mine at western edge of Ordos basin as example[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2016,44(5):108-112.
    [12]
    刘晓东. 陕北侏罗纪煤田煤炭资源勘查利用现状分析[J]. 地下水,2017,39(5):126-128.

    LIU Xiaodong. Analysis on the present situation of exploration and utilization of the Jurassic coal field in northern Shaanxi[J]. Groundwater,2017,39(5):126-128.
    [13]
    吕玉广,齐东合. 内蒙古鄂托克前旗新上海一号煤矿111084工作面突水原因与机理[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2016,28(9):53-57.

    LYU Yuguang,QI Donghe. No.111084 working face water bursting causation and mechanism in Xinshanghai No.1 coalmine,Otog Front Banner,Inner Mongolia[J]. Cola Geology of China,2016,28(9):53-57.
    [14]
    田增林,黄选明,曹海东,等. 基于Aquifer Test的底板放水试验参数计算与评价研究[J]. 煤炭工程,2018,50(9):96-100.

    TIAN Zenglin,HUANG Xuanming,CAO Haidong,et al. Parameter calculation and evaluation in coalbed floor dewatering test based on aquifer test[J]. Coal Engineering,2018,50(9):96-100.
    [15]
    武强,许珂,张维. 再论煤层顶板涌(突)水危险性预测评价的"三图-双预测法"[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(6):1341-1347.

    WU Qiang,XU Ke,ZHANG Wei. Further research on "three maps-two predictions" method for prediction on coal seam roof water bursting risk[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(6):1341-1347.
    [16]
    武强,樊振丽,刘守强,等. 基于GIS的信息融合型含水层富水性评价方法:富水性指数法[J]. 煤炭学报,2011,36(7):1124-1128.

    WU Qiang,FAN Zhenli,LIU Shouqiang,et al. Water-richness evaluation method of water-filled aquifer based on the principle of information fusion with GIS:Water-richness index method[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2011,36(7):1124-1128.
    [17]
    吕玉广,肖庆华,程久龙. 弱富水软岩水-沙混合型突水机制与防治技术研究:以上海庙矿区为例[J]. 煤炭学报,2019,44(10):3154-3163.

    LYU Yuguang,XIAO Qinghua,CHENG Jiulong. Mechanism and prevention of water-sand inrush in soft rock with weakly abundant water:A case study in Shanghai temple mining area[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2019,44(10):3154-3163.
    [18]
    武强,徐华,赵颖旺,等. 基于"三图法"煤层顶板突水动态可视化预测[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(12):2968-2974.

    WU Qiang,XU Hua,ZHAO Yingwang,et al. Dynamic visualization and prediction for water bursting on coal roof based on "three maps method"[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(12):2968-2974.
    [19]
    牛宏,梁杏,张人权. 通量上边界与水头上边界方法的地下水流系统模拟对比[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(3):977-985.

    NIU Hong,LIANG Xing,ZHANG Renquan. Comparison of flux upper boundary and given head upper boundary in simulation of groundwater flow systems[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2014,44(3):977-985.
    [20]
    陈晋栋,王武祥,张磊蕾,等. 透水混凝土透水系数试验方法的影响因素[J]. 科学技术与工程,2018,18(16):251-255.

    CHEN Jindong,WANG Wuxiang,ZHANG Leilei,et al. Influencing factors of permeability test methods of pervious concrete[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2018,18(16):251-255.
  • Related Articles

    [1]JIN Dewu, WANG Tiantian, ZHAO Baofeng, LI Debin, ZHOU Zhenfang, SHANG Hongbo. Distribution characteristics and formation mechanism of high salinity groundwater in northeast Ningdong Coalfield[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2022, 50(7): 118-127. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.10.0593
    [2]MA Hongtao, SONG Xiaoxia, LI Kaijie, ZHAO Jingui, ZHANG Tianguang, LIU Jianping. Changes of petrographic characteristics and quality of contact-metamorphosed coals in the Datong coalfield[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(2): 99-105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.02.016
    [3]QU Xiaorong. Distribution characteristics of associated elements in Middle Jurassic coal in the north of Datong coalfield and their geological significance[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(1): 64-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.01.009
    [4]GUO Dongxin, WANG Wei, CHENG Lijun, TANG Shuheng, ZHANG Hualian, ZHANG Yuelei. Vertical distribution features of physical properties of coal reservoir in shaft QM-1 of Datong block of Qijiang area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(5): 102-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.016
    [5]GUO Wanzhong, CHENG Yuehong, GAO Yuping, CHEN Zhenguo, ZHANG Zhengwei, WANG Cun. Structural characteristics and coal-bearing boundaries of Taiyuan Formation in Datong coalfield[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2015, 43(5): 1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2015.05.001
    [6]YANG Xiaohui, LI Dechun, YU Pengfei. Amplitude-depth distribution of Rayleigh channel wave[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2011, 39(4): 64-66. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2011.04.016
    [7]LI Lan-ting, HOU Ji-xiang. Research on the application of wireless wave perspect in tunnel in Datong coalfield[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2001, 29(5): 52-55.
    [8]Gao Yuping. THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE UNDERGROUND RADIO PENETRATION IN THE DATONG JURSSIC COALFIELD[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1998, 26(3): 66-69.
    [9]Chang Jianglin, Gao Qiang. CHARACTERISTICS OF FLORA FROM THE DATONG FORMATION IN NINGWU COALFIELD,SHANXI[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1996, 24(1): 4-8.
    [10]Zhang zhenxi. THE ANTHROCOLOGY CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS GEOLOGIC SIGNIFCANCE OF THE THERMAL METAMORPHIC COAL IN DATONG COALFIELD[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1994, 22(S1): 62-64.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (193) PDF downloads (19) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return