Volume 48 Issue 4
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
LIU Yinan, LIU Yong, XIN Fudong, WEI Hongyu. Applicability of mercury injection test to the characterization of low rank coal and its correction method[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(4): 118-125. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.04.017
Citation: LIU Yinan, LIU Yong, XIN Fudong, WEI Hongyu. Applicability of mercury injection test to the characterization of low rank coal and its correction method[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(4): 118-125. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.04.017
shu

Applicability of mercury injection test to the characterization of low rank coal and its correction method

  • 1. China United Coalbed Methane United Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China;

  • 2. School of Energy, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1703126)

More Information
  • Received Date: April 15, 2020
  • Revised Date: May 27, 2020
  • Published Date: August 24, 2020
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • As an effective method for coal reservoir characterization, mercury intrusion has been widely used in reservoir property analysis of medium-high rank coal. However, for low-rank coal, due to its loose and brittle nature, the process of mercury intrusion will destroy the pore structure, resulting in poor applicability of mercury intrusion experiments. In order to accurately assess the damage to the pore structure of low-rank coal by mercury intrusion experiments, lignite and long flame coal were selected as the research objects, and the pore size distribution of coal was tested by mercury intrusion and nuclear magnetic resonance. The results show that for lignite and long-flame coal with a low degree of compaction and gelification, the mercury intrusion test process destroys the primary structure of the macro-mesopores, resulting in an increase in the proportion of mesopores. At the same time, the micropore volume is too high due to the matrix compression effect. With the increase of coalification, the influence on long-flame coal is less than that on lignite. Moreover, nitrogen adsorption results were used to correct the test results of mercury injection under high pressure, eliminating the influence of elastic deformation caused by high pressure. The results show that the test error of lignite mercury intrusion before calibration is 87%, while after calibration it is only 18%. Experimental studies have shown that the combined use of nuclear magnetic resonance testing and nitrogen adsorption experiments can significantly improve the accuracy of mercury intrusion method used in low-rank coal pore test results.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (15)
  • [1]
    孙钦平,王生维,田文广,等. 二连盆地吉尔嘎朗图凹陷低煤阶煤层气富集模式[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(4):59-66.

    SUN Qinping,WANG Shengwei,TIAN Wenguang,et al. Accumulation patterns of low-rank coalbed methane gas in the Jiergalangtu Sag of the Erlian basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(4):59-66.
    [2]
    孙粉锦,田文广,陈振宏,等. 中国低煤阶煤层气多元成藏特征及勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(6):10-18.

    SUN Fenjin,TIAN Wenguang,CHEN Zhenhong,et al. Low-rank coalbed methane gas pooling in China:Characteristics and exploration orientation[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(6):10-18.
    [3]
    刘爱华,傅雪海,梁文庆,等. 不同煤阶煤孔隙分布特征及其对煤层气开发的影响[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2013,41(4):104-108.

    LIU Aihua,FU Xuehai,LIANG Wenqing,et al. Pore distribution features of different rank coal and influences to coalbed methane development[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2013,41(4):104-108.
    [4]
    李振,邵龙义,侯海海,等. 高煤阶煤孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 现代地质,2017,31(3):595-605.

    LI Zhen,SHAO Longyi,HOU Haihai,et al. Pore structures and fractal characteristics of high rank coals[J]. Geoscience,2017,31(3):595-605.
    [5]
    吴双,汤达祯,许浩,等. 中-高煤阶煤岩孔隙发育特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2016,44(6):69-74.

    WU Shuang,TANG Dazhen,XU hao,et al. Characteristics of pore development in medium-high rank coal[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2016,44(6):69-74.
    [6]
    郑司建,王小垚,周三栋. 准噶尔盆地南缘低煤阶煤储层孔隙分形特征[J]. 煤炭技术,2017,36(7):133-135.

    ZHENG Sijian,WANG Xiaoyao,ZHOU Sandong,et al. Fractal dimension of low-rank coal reservoir pore in southern margin of Junggar basin[J]. Coal Technology,2017,36(7):133-135.
    [7]
    董夔,贾建称,巩泽文,等. 淮北许疃矿构造煤孔隙结构及压敏效应[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(2):58-65.

    DONG Kui,JIA Jiancheng,GONG Zewen,et al. Study on pore structure and pressure-sensitive effect of tectonic coal in Huaibei Xutuan mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2019,47(2):58-65.
    [8]
    FU Haijiao,TANG Dazhen,XU Ting,et al. Characteristics of pore structure and fractal dimension of low-rank coal:A case study of Lower Jurassic Xishanyao coal in the southern Junggar basin,NW China[J]. Fuel,2017,193:254-264.
    [9]
    郑司建,姚艳斌,蔡益栋,等. 准噶尔盆地南缘低煤阶煤储层可动流体及孔径分布特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2018,46(1):56-60.

    ZHENG Sijian,YAO Yanbin,CAI Yidong,et al. Characteristics of movable fluid and pore size distribution of low rank coals reservoir in southern margin of Junggar basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2018,46(1):56-60.
    [10]
    FU Haijiao,TANG Dazhen,XU Hao,et al. Abrupt changes in reservoir properties of low-rank coal and its control factors for methane adsorbability[J]. Energy & Fuels,2016,30(3):2084-2094.
    [11]
    孟智强,郭和坤,周尚文,等. 核磁共振可动流体实验最佳离心力确定新方法研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2013,13(25):7307-7311.

    MENG Zhiqiang,GUO Hekun,ZHOU Shangwen,et al. Research of new method to calibrate the optimum centrifugal force for nuclear magnetic resonance movable fluid experiment[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(25):7307-7311.
    [12]
    朱林奇,张冲,石文睿,等. 结合压汞实验与核磁共振测井预测束缚水饱和度方法研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2016,16(15):22-29.

    ZHU Linqi,ZHANG Chong,SHI Wenrui,et al. Study on the method of prediction of irreducible water saturation by combining mercury intrusion and nmr logging data[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2016,16(15):22-29.
    [13]
    宁传祥,姜振学,苏思远,等. 泥页岩核磁共振T2谱换算孔隙半径方法[J]. 科学技术与工程,2016,16(27):14-19.

    NING Chuanxiang,JIANG Zhenxue,SU Siyuan,et al. Method for calculating pore radius distribution in shale reservoirs from NMR T2 spectra[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2016,16(27):14-19.
    [14]
    XU Hao,TANG Dazhen,CHEN Yanpeng,et al. Effective porosity in lignite using kerosene with low-field nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Fuel,2018,213:158-163.
    [15]
    何法,祝捷,张博,等. 对煤的压汞实验数据的压缩性修正[C]//北京力学会第二十三届学术年会会议论文集. 北京:北京力学会,2017:458-459.

    HE Fa,ZHU Jie,ZHANG Bo,et al. Compressibility correction of experimental data of mercury injection in coal[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd Academic Year Conference of the Beijing Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Beijing:Beijing Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,2017:458-459.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]MENG Zhaoping, ZHANG Kun, SHEN Zhen. Difference analysis of methane diffusion properties between tectonic coal and primary coal[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2022, 50(3): 102-109. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.12.0799
    [2]ZHOU Xihua, HAN Mingxu, BAI Gang, LAN Anchang, FU Zhihao. Experimental study on the influence of CO2 injection pressure on gas diffusion coefficient[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(1): 81-86,99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.008
    [3]YANG Zhaozhong, HAN Jinxuan, ZHANG Jian, HE Rui, LU Yanjun, LI Xiaogang. Molecular simulation of the influence of foam fracturing fluid additives on coalbed methane diffusion[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(5): 94-103. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.05.013
    [4]MENG Zhaoping, ZHANG Guiyuan, LI Guoqing, LIU Jinrong. Analysis of diffusion properties of methane in low rank coal[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(2): 84-89. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.02.014
    [5]LIN Chen, JIA Tianrang, ZHOU Shiwei, ZHANG Yugui. Diffusion characteristics of methane adsorption process in granular coal[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(4): 44-49. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.04.007
    [6]LIN Yabing, MA Dongmin, LIU Yuhui, MA Wei, JIA Xuemei. Experiment of the influence of temperature on coalbed methane adsorption[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2012, 40(6): 24-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2012.06.006
    [7]HE Jun, HAO Guo-wen. Relationship between hydraulic conductivity and diffusion coefficient of clay liner[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2007, 35(6): 40-43.
    [8]LI Yu-hui, CUI Yong-jun, ZHONG Ling-wen, JIANG Wen-ping. Study on dynamic diffusion characteristics of methane in coal matrix[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2005, 33(6): 31-34.
    [9]NIE Baisheng, ZHANG Li, MA Wenfang. DIFFUSION MICRO-MECHANISM OF COAL BED METHANE IN COAL PROES[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2000, 28(6): 20-22.
    [10]WEI Zhong-tao, LIU Huan-jie, MENG Jian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ON COALBED METHANE DIFFUSION IN GEOHISTORY[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1998, 26(5): 19-24.

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 蓝龙飞. 在冻融条件下某露天矿山边坡变形特征研究. 矿产勘查. 2024(S1): 43-46 .
    2. 梁博，杨更社，冯伟，潘振兴，孙杰龙，刘慧，陈奇. 冻融诱发平面滑移型岩质边坡失稳模型试验研究. 西安科技大学学报. 2024(06): 1118-1126 .
    3. 张庆武，阴子晔，刘树弟. 岩土冻结的主要影响因素分析及应对措施. 煤炭与化工. 2023(10): 7-10+18 .
    4. 王云. 分析高陡岩土边坡绿色生态环境修复技术. 世界有色金属. 2022(09): 211-213 .
    5. 陈军浩，庄言，陈笔尖，赵振伟，王启云. 滨海软土冻结温度场发展规律. 煤田地质与勘探. 2020(04): 174-182 . 本站查看
    6. 谭捍华，李斌，李家欣，袁维，李宗鸿. 冻融循环作用下白云岩边坡的稳定性分析. 科学技术与工程. 2020(33): 13825-13832 .
    7. 李国锋，李宁，刘乃飞，朱才辉. 多年冻岩土区露天矿边坡局部稳定性探究. 西安理工大学学报. 2019(01): 53-61 .
    8. 李伟. 分析高陡岩土边坡绿色生态环境修复技术. 居舍. 2018(32): 46 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (149) PDF downloads (13) Cited by(17)
    Related

    Copyright of website design © Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration 陕ICP备05001372号-6 陕公网安备 61019002002193号

    Address: Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration, No.82 Jinye 1st Rd, High-Tech Zone, Xi'an City, Shaanxi, China

    Tel: 029-81778075 E-mail: ccrimtdzykt@vip.163.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return