Solution and typical curves of seepage model of water-bearing coal seam with leakage recharge

YANG Yu; TIAN Huijun; ZHANG Hao; SUN Hansen; CHEN Wangang

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.01.019

Volume 45 Issue 1

Feb. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION > 2017 > 45(1): 95-99. > DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.01.019

YANG Yu, TIAN Huijun, ZHANG Hao, SUN Hansen, CHEN Wangang. Solution and typical curves of seepage model of water-bearing coal seam with leakage recharge[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(1): 95-99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.01.019

Citation:

PDF (468 KB)

Solution and typical curves of seepage model of water-bearing coal seam with leakage recharge

1. Energy College of Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;
2. China United Coalbed Methane Corporation, Beijing 100011, China

Funds:

National Scientific and Technology Major Project (2011ZX05060-002)

More Information

Received Date: September 06, 2015
Published Date: February 24, 2017

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

To study the effects of leaky aquifer on the earlier production of coalbed methane wells, the leaky aquifer model was established based on transient flow theory. The model was solved under Laplace transform, and Stehfest reverse inversion was used to obtain the real space solution, then dimensionless pressure and pressure derivative type curves were created in log-log plots with new parameters. Based on physical flow mechanism, the influence of leaky aquifer on curve shape was concluded that the radial flow would end earlier with stronger leakage coefficient. The way to obtain permeability, skin factor and leakage coefficient by typical curve match was also proposed. Typical curves are useful for evaluating leaky aquifer and guiding subsequent production adjustment of CBM wells.
- coalbed methane,
- formation water,
- leakage

FullText(HTML)

References (20)

References

[1]	ONSAGER P R, COX D O. Aquifer controls on coalbed methane development in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers,2000,1:1-8.
[2]	COX D O,ONSAGER P R. Application of leaky aquifer type curves for coalbed methane characterization[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers,2002,1:1-10.
[3]	孟召平. 煤层气开发地质学理论与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2010:198-200.
[4]	KATZ M L,TEK M R. A theoretical study of pressure distribution and fluid flux in bounded stratified porous systems with crossflow[J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal,1962, 68(3):225-234.
[5]	RUSSELL D G,PRATS M. The practical aspects of interlayer crossflow[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology,1962,54(6):589-593.
[6]	贾永禄. 具有窜流的双层油气藏井底压力动态模型[J]. 天然气工业,1997,17(1):52-54. JIA Yonglu. The model of bottom hole pressure for two-layered oil and gas reservoir with cross flow[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 1997,17(1):52-54.
[7]	张烈辉,王海涛,贾永禄,等. 层间窜流的双孔介质双层油藏渗流模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2009,31(5):178-182. ZHANG Liehui,WANG Haitao,JIA Yonglu,et al. Model of two-layered reservoir with cross flow and dual porosity media[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition),2009,31(5):178-182.
[8]	陈方方,贾永禄,张福祥. 具有层间越流的两层三孔渗流模型与试井曲线[J]. 油气井测试,2011,20(1):10-13. CHEN Fangfang,JIA Yonglu,ZHANG Fuxiang. Percolation model and well test curves of two-layer and three-porosity reservoir with interzonal crossflow[J]. Well Testing,2011,20(1):10-13.
[9]	霍进,贾永禄,王海涛,等. 多层窜流油气藏模型及井底压力动态[J]. 油气井测试,2006,15(2):1-4. HUO Jin, JIA Yonglu, WANG Haitao, et al. Oil and gas reservoir model for multiplayer channeling and dynamic monitor hole pressure[J]. Well Testing,2006,15(2):1-4.
[10]	孙贺东,刘磊,周芳德,等. 无限大三层越流油气藏井底压力的精确解及典型曲线[J]. 矿物岩石,2003,23(1):101-104. SUN Hedong, LIU Lei, ZHOU Fangde, et al. Exact solution and typical curve for infinite three layers reservoir with crossflow[J]. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,2003,23(1):101-104.
[11]	高承泰. 具有越流多层状油藏分层不稳定试井的解释理论[J]. 石油学报,1990,11(3):72-81. GAO Chengtai. Determination of individual layer properties by a layer-by-layer well test in multilayer reservoirs with crossflow[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,1990,11(3):72-81.
[12]	吴宜禄. 多层气藏压力动态特征及试井分析理论研究[D]. 成都:西南石油学院,2004:17-39.
[13]	苏现波, 林晓英. 煤层气地质学[M]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社, 2009.
[14]	HANTUSH M S,JACOB C E. Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer[J]. Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union,1955,36(1):95-100.
[15]	HANTUSH M S,JACOB C E. Steady three-dimensional flow to a well in a two-layered aquifer[J]. Transactions American Geophysical Union,1955,36(2):286-292.
[16]	STRELTSOVA T D. Well testing in heterogenous formations[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons Incorporated,1988:313-314.
[17]	刘能强. 实用现代试井解释方法[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2003.
[18]	杨宇,张凤东,孙晗森. 试井分析[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2015.
[19]	STEHFEST H. Remark on Algorithm 368 numerical inversion of Laplace transforms[J]. Comunications of ACM,1970,13(10):624-625.
[20]	张双斌,苏现波,郭红玉. 煤层气井越流补给的判识方法[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2013,41(5):29-32. ZHANG Shuangbin,SU Xianbo,GUO Hongyu. Identifying method of leakage recharge in CBM wells[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2013,41(5):29-32.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	林海飞，仇悦，王瑞哲，杨二豪，严敏，郝荷杰，张笑盈. 多级脉冲超声波激励含水煤体瓦斯解吸特征的试验研究. 煤炭学报. 2024(03): 1403-1413 .
2.	王帅峰，韩思杰，桑树勋，郭常建，郭庆，徐昂，张金超. 煤层亚临界/超临界CO_2吸附特征与封存模式. 天然气工业. 2024(06): 152-168 .
3.	韦慧，韩志华，孙峤昳，任凯，蒋复国，王保登，马琳鸽，李永龙. 多孔蜂窝活性炭材料对CO_2吸附热力学研究. 炭素技术. 2023(01): 7-14 .
4.	庄小威，唐朝，武海涛. 水分对煤全应力-应变过程渗流特征的影响. 煤矿安全. 2023(12): 25-31 .

Other cited types(8)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (63) PDF downloads (10) Cited by(12)

Solution and typical curves of seepage model of water-bearing coal seam with leakage recharge

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

Other cited types(8)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Solution and typical curves of seepage model of water-bearing coal seam with leakage recharge

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

Other cited types(8)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content