WANG Yunfei, ZHENG Xiaojuan, JIAO Huazhe, ZHAO Hongbo. Comparative analysis of sandstone experiment strength and different strength criteria prediction results[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(5): 122-125,130. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.05.023
Citation: WANG Yunfei, ZHENG Xiaojuan, JIAO Huazhe, ZHAO Hongbo. Comparative analysis of sandstone experiment strength and different strength criteria prediction results[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(5): 122-125,130. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.05.023

Comparative analysis of sandstone experiment strength and different strength criteria prediction results

Funds: 

Henan Provincial Education Department Key Project(13A440323)

More Information
  • Received Date: April 07, 2015
  • Available Online: October 22, 2021
  • Tested Meiyukou mine roadway sandstone Brazil splitting, uniaxial and conventional triaxial strength. Analyzed sandstone the characteristics of deformation and strength, according to the overall minimum fitting error of square root identified the parameters of 5 strength criteria, compared the difference of the overall fitting precision of various strength criteria and the difference between experiment strengths and prediction values of tensile strengths and compressive strengths of various strength criteria. Obtained the following main research conclusions:Sandstone brittle characteristics is significant under uniaxial compression and lower confining pressure, the yield stage increases obviously with the increasing of confining pressure, Sandstone failure characteristics gradually change from brittle into ductile. For the overall fitting precision of experiment data, Mohr-Coulomb criterion is not the most ideal, exponential strength criterion is the best, Hoek-Brown criterion and Bieniawski criterion have the little difference. For the tensile strength prediction value, Mohr-Coulomb criterion significantly overestimates the tensile strength, thus it is not suitable for predicting the tensile strength, exponential strength criterion is the most ideal, Bieniawski strength criterion cannot reflect the tensile strength properties of rock. For uniaxial strength and compressive strength of different confining pressure, linear Mohr-Coulomb criterion deviates from the most experimental data, the prediction results deviate significantly from the true value especially under higher confining pressure, Hoek-Brown criterion and Bieniawski criterion almost have the consistent prediction results, Sheory cri-terion prediction results are slightly higher under higher confining pressure, exponential strength criterion is close to most of the test data, the prediction precision is the best.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Zhizhuang, WU Peng, SUN Qiang, LIU Rui, WANG Lingbo. Production characteristics of deep coalbed methane wells in the Linxing block and associated their influencing factors[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(8): 69-78. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.03.0214
    [2]LI Bin, YANG Fan, ZHANG Hongjie, FENG Lei, AN Qi, HAO Zhaobing. Technology for efficient production of deep coalbed methane in the Shenfu block[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(8): 57-68. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0082
    [3]WANG Peng, LI Bin, WANG Kunjian, ZHANG Hongjie, ZHANG Yingchun, DU Jia, ZHANG Linqiang, WANG Xiaoqi, SU Haiyan, CHEN Guanghui, YANG Ruiyue. Critical drilling and completion techniques for deep coalbed methane in the Shenfu block and their applications[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(8): 44-56. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.01.0079
    [4]ZHU Guanghui, JI Hongquan, MI Honggang, ZHANG Yingchun, SUN Qiang, ZHAO Wei, ZHU Xueshen, KANG Lifang, WANG Yuchuan. Discovery of a large gas field of deep coalbed methane in the Shenfu block and its implications[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(8): 12-21. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.02.0089
    [5]WU Peng, HU Weiqiang, LI Yangbing, MA Litao, LI Yong, ZHAO Fei, NIU Yanwei, CHEN Jianqi, LI Panpan, LIU Zaizhen, LI Chenchen, CAO Di, LIU Cheng. Geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of deep coalbed methane in the Linxing-Shenfu block[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(5): 56-66. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0632
    [6]LI Guoyong, YAO Yanbin, WANG Hui, MENG Lingjian, LI Peijie, ZHANG Yongchao, WANG Jianwei, MA Limin. Deep coalbed methane resources in the Shenmu-Jiaxian block, Ordos Basin, China: Geological characteristics and potential for exploration and exploitation[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(2): 70-80. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.07.0436
    [7]NIE Zhihong, XU Fengyin, SHI Xiaosong, XIONG Xianyue, SONG Wei, ZHANG Lei, LIU Ying, SUN Wei, FENG Yanqing, LIU Shirui, YAN Xia, SUN Xiaoyi, WU Mansheng. Outcomes and implications of pilot tests for deep coalbed methane production on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2024, 52(2): 1-12. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0645
    [8]ZHU Guanghui, JI Hongquan, MI Honggang, ZHANG Yingchun, SUN Qiang, ZHAO Wei, ZHU Xueshen, KANG Lifang, WANG Yuchuan. Discovery and implications of the large deep coalbed methane in Shenfu gas field[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION.
    [9]WANG Zhizhuang, WU Peng, SUN Qiang, LIU Rui, WANG Lingbo. Production feature and influencing factors of deep coalbed methane In Linxing Block[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION.
    [10]LI Guoyong, YAO Yanbin, WANG Hui, MENG Lingjian, LI Peijie, ZHANG Yongchao, WANG Jianwei, MA Limin. Geological characteristics and development potential of deep coalbed methane resources in Shenmu-Jiaxian Block, Ordos Basin, China[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 张平松,刘畅. 煤系砂岩受载破裂全程多尺度多参数测试及表征. 中国矿业大学学报. 2025(01): 172-185 .
    2. 赵峰. 孙家沟煤矿深厚煤层开采底板变形特征综合研究. 山东煤炭科技. 2025(02): 120-124+130 .
    3. 毛怀勇,韩磊,左红飞,苏文,刘科峰,王应政,苗葳. 担水沟煤矿特厚煤层开采底板导水破坏带深度实测研究. 煤炭与化工. 2024(05): 31-37 .
    4. 丁序海,张侯,陈录平,党国杰. 基于多频无线电坑透技术的煤矿地质综合勘探研究. 能源与环保. 2024(06): 82-87 .
    5. 鲁晶津. 工作面采动破坏过程电阻率动态响应特征研究. 工矿自动化. 2023(01): 36-45+108 .
    6. 袁亮,张平松. 煤矿透明地质模型动态重构的关键技术与路径思考. 煤炭学报. 2023(01): 1-14 .
    7. 孟亚周,张钦,闫扬帆. 倾斜不稳定煤层采动工作面底板破坏深度研究. 煤炭技术. 2023(03): 85-90 .
    8. 姚多喜,刘畅. 煤层采动底板变形破坏过程多参数精细感知方法研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(07): 44-52 .
    9. 张玉军,张风达,张志巍,孙林,李友伟. 采动煤层底板层次性破坏特征全空间多参量协同监测. 煤炭科学技术. 2022(02): 86-94 .
    10. 李刚,刘海振,杨庆贺,牛伟锋. 带压开采煤层底板破坏特征与突水风险分析. 中国安全科学学报. 2022(05): 68-76 .
    11. 王程,安又新,朱宏军,郭建磊. 孔中瞬变电磁法在综放工作面底板破坏深度探测中的应用研究. 煤田地质与勘探. 2022(07): 79-84 . 本站查看
    12. 孙斌杨,张平松. 基于DFOS的采场围岩变形破坏监测研究进展与展望. 工程地质学报. 2021(04): 985-1001 .
    13. 杨海平,刘盛东,杨彩,章俊. 煤层顶底板采动破坏同步动态监测电性特征分析. 工程地质学报. 2021(04): 1002-1009 .
    14. 高银贵,孔皖军,陈永春,薛贤明,郑刘根,常成林,姜春露,国伟,雷锋,王刚. 特厚煤层综放开采下工作面底板岩层破坏特征. 能源环境保护. 2021(06): 68-75 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (114) PDF downloads (6) Cited by(17)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return