WANG Hu, YUE Jianhua, JIANG Zhihai, SUN Hongwei. Safely improving by stage the upper limit of mining under extremely thick loose aquifer[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2013, 41(6): 61-63,67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2013.06.015
Citation: WANG Hu, YUE Jianhua, JIANG Zhihai, SUN Hongwei. Safely improving by stage the upper limit of mining under extremely thick loose aquifer[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2013, 41(6): 61-63,67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2013.06.015

Safely improving by stage the upper limit of mining under extremely thick loose aquifer

More Information
  • Received Date: December 24, 2012
  • Available Online: October 22, 2021
  • For maximum recovery of coal and safely reducing waterproof coal pillar in Huaibei Liudong coal mine, the upper limit of mining was improved by two steps:water-proof and sand control. In west No.3 mining district, firstly through research and analysis of the hydrogeological data of the aquifer and water-resisting clay layer at the bottom of the Quaternary system, the bottom aquifer of the Quaternary system in the western 31000 coalface was determined as weak watery, and the mining disturbance of water body was of level II. Then through numerical simulation, physical simulation comparison and analysis, the damage height of overlying rock after mining was studied and compared with the mine actual observation value, the development height of the water conducting fractured zone was confirmed as 41.3 meters; The paper put forward the safe and reasonable waterproof upper limit of mining, and 0.221 million tons of dull reserves were liberated. A good foundation has been set for further safe mining through sand control.
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIU Gaofeng, LI Baolin, ZHANG Zhen, LIU Huan, GUAN Wenbo, SI Nian. Gas expansion energy of coals with different metamorphic degrees: Evolutionary characteristics and their implications for the outburst prediction[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2023, 51(10): 1-8. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.02.0103
    [2]ZHANG Yu, LI Yong, WANG Yanbin, WANG Zhuangsen, ZHAO Shihu, HAN Wenlong. SAXS-based nano-scale pore structure characteristics of coals with different metamorphic degrees[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(6): 142-150. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.06.017
    [3]YANG Hongmin, LIANG Longhui. Influence of CO2 on the replacement effect of CH4 in coal of different metamorphic grade under isobaric diffusion[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(5): 55-59,65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.009
    [4]ZHANG Lusuo, GUAN Yingbin, LI Haimei, ZHANG Guobin, ZHAO Ping, LI Su, ZHENG Jian, CUI Sheng. Variety regularity of metamorphic coal of Longdong coalfield in Xingtai by X-ray diffraction method[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2010, 38(2): 1-4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.02.001
    [5]LI Xiao-ming, CAO Dai-yong, ZHAN Wen-feng. Elements distribution and effecting factors of high rank coals of different deformational-metamorphic types in Beihuaiyang area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2006, 34(6): 1-3.
    [6]LI Xiao-ming, CAO Dai-yong, ZHANG Shou-ren, XING Xiu-yun. Study of the XRD parameter evolution of coal of different metamorphism types[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2003, 31(3): 5-7.
    [7]TANG Fang-tou. The application of X radial analyze of coal in slip fault in Zhadu Mining Area[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2002, 30(1): 1-3.
    [8]Wang Chao, Yu Bing, Song Aixia, Zhang Jing, Li Shuhua. METAMORPHIC COEFFICIENT,A NEW INDEX FOR METAMORPHIC DEGREE OF COAL[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1997, 25(2): 18-21.
    [9]Cao Yunxing, Zhang Yugui, Li Kaiqi, Hou Quanlin, Guo Deyong. TECTONIC COAL DYNA MOMETAMORPHISM AND EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1996, 24(4): 15-18.
    [10]Liu Jinzhong. CHARACTERISTICS OF FTIR,ESR,XRD OF THE COAL METAMORPHIZED BY SUB-VOCANICS[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 1993, 21(5): 16-20.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 尹尚先,姚辉,梁满玉,吴威,连会青,侯恩科,赵鹏,张义安,王雄. 突水系数60年:面临困境及发展方向. 煤炭学报. 2025(01): 600-609 .
    2. 姚辉,尹慧超,梁满玉,尹尚先,侯恩科,连会青,夏向学,张金福,吴传实. 机器学习方法在矿井水防治理论体系研究中的应用思考. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(05): 107-117 . 本站查看
    3. 杨茹蕙,李小萌,王铁记. 基于IAHP-EWM博弈论的煤层底板突水影响因素研究. 煤炭与化工. 2024(07): 43-47+52 .
    4. 姚辉,尹慧超,尹尚先,侯恩科,毕梦,连会青,夏向学,梁满玉. 底板突水危险性评价研究进展. 煤炭科学技术. 2024(S1): 183-191 .
    5. 朱宗奎. 基于Lawrence风险公式的突水系数修正模型研究. 矿业安全与环保. 2023(03): 89-94 .
    6. 丁晓欣,种亚平,高静思,朱佳. “最后一公里”工程供水效果评价研究. 水利规划与设计. 2023(08): 50-54 .
    7. 穆渴心,冉栋刚,张平清,张璐,王茂鑫. 基于组合赋权秩和比的实验室安全管理评价模型构建. 实验室研究与探索. 2023(05): 314-319 .
    8. 代革联,吴佩凝,牛超,许珂,王峰,赵国杰,白丰源. 应用加权秩和比法评价底板突水危险性. 煤炭技术. 2023(09): 109-113 .
    9. 马洪斌,郝琨,齐洁莹,连政,刘祥,李苑红,申丹. 基于赋权与加权秩和比的变电设备状态评价. 电力大数据. 2023(05): 53-61 .
    10. 崔俊超,平宇,郝建卿,任君豪,孟建勇,王心义. 基于区间变权和未知测度理论的煤层底板突水危险性评价. 地下水. 2023(05): 1-6+25 .
    11. 安律宁,陈继福,董广铭,李玉兵. 基于层次聚类模糊综合评判的矿井突水危险性评价. 煤炭与化工. 2023(10): 49-56 .
    12. 王松松,代革联,牛超. 基于组合赋权法的煤层底板突水危险性研究. 能源与环保. 2023(11): 98-104+110 .
    13. 陈军涛,李文昕,薛峰,王凯,张呈祥,宋涛. 主客观组合赋权的TOPSIS-RSR注浆效果综合评价方法. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(S2): 191-199 .
    14. 方恩才,余国锋,赵一鸣. 张集煤矿厚煤层工作面底板灰岩突水监测预报研究. 煤炭科技. 2022(04): 116-121 .

    Other cited types(11)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (61) PDF downloads (3) Cited by(25)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return