WU Peng,HU Weiqiang,LI Yangbing,et al. Geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of deep coalbed methane in the Linxing-Shenfu block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(5):56−66. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0632
Citation: WU Peng,HU Weiqiang,LI Yangbing,et al. Geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of deep coalbed methane in the Linxing-Shenfu block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2024,52(5):56−66. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0632

Geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of deep coalbed methane in the Linxing-Shenfu block

More Information
  • Received Date: October 14, 2023
  • Revised Date: March 24, 2024
  • Accepted Date: May 24, 2024
  • Available Online: April 28, 2024
  • Identifying the origin and geochemical characteristics of deep coalbed methane (CBM) is critical for its exploration and production. This study examined the desorbed gas from deep-CBM parameter wells in the Linxing-Shenfu block on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin. It systematically tested the composition, content, and carbon isotopes of CBM in coal seams Nos. 8 and 9. In combination with the degree of thermal evolution, gas-bearing properties, coal seam burial depths, geological structures, and hydrogeologic conditions, it delved into the geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of deep CBM. The results show that the deep CBM in the study area consists primarily of CH4, CO2, N2, ethane, propane, isobutane, n-butane, isopentane, and n-pentane. Among them, CH4 exhibits the highest content, with volume fractions ranging from 75.98% to 96.20% (average: 86.49%), succeeded by ethane (average: 5.97%), CO2 (average: 5.18%), and propane (average: 1.24%), exhibiting subtle differences in gas content compared to shallow CBM. The deep CBM manifests δ13C1 (CH4), δ13CCO2, δ13C2, and δ13C3 values ranging from −51.9‰ to −38.2‰ (average: −42.84‰), from −8.6‰ to −0.63‰ (average: −4.66‰), from −27.36‰ to −18.70‰ (average: −25.27‰), and from −25.96‰ to −14.69‰ (average: −22.93‰), respectively. It predominantly proves to be thermogenic gas, displaying lower δ13C1 (CH4) values and higher δ13CCO2 values compared to shallow CBM. On a horizontal plane, its δ13C1 values show a growing trend from southeast to northwest in the Linxing area. The study area kept subsiding from the Carboniferous to the end of the Triassic, with the Middle Jurassic and the Early Cretaceous identified as the primary hydrocarbon-generating phases. Specifically, the Middle Jurassic witnessed a prolonged duration, a low average rate, and moderate hydrocarbon yield of hydrocarbon generation. In contrast, the hydrocarbon generation during the Early Cretaceous featured a higher rate, a significantly increased yield, and a peak intensity, establishing the e Early Cretaceous as a dominant hydrocarbon-generating stage. Due to the controlling effects of gas fractionation, the characteristics of reservoir pores and fractures, reservoir pressure, and the roof and floor tightness of coal seams, the δ13C1 values increase with the increasing maximum vitrinite reflectance (Rmax), gas content, and burial depth. They are relatively high in synclinal cores, the stress concentration zones of faults, and fold flanks. However, they are lower in the stress release zones of faults and anticlinal cores, suggesting inferior CBM storage conditions, unfavorable for gas accumulation, in these zones. Influenced by groundwater dissolution, the δ13C1 values are relatively low in areas with strong hydrodynamic conditions, while showing an insignificant downward trend in zones with weak fluid dynamics or fluid stagnation. The comprehensive investigation into the geochemical indicators of CBM leads to the conclusion that the Linxing and southeastern Shenfu areas are enriched in CBM, especially the former. This study can serve as a reference for target area selection and well placement in future CBM exploration and exploitation in the study area.

  • [1]
    秦勇,申建,李小刚. 中国煤层气资源控制程度及可靠性分析[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(6):19−32.

    QIN Yong,SHEN Jian,LI Xiaogang. Control degree and reliability of CBM resources in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(6):19−32.
    [2]
    李勇,徐立富,张守仁,等. 深煤层含气系统差异及开发对策[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(2):900−917.

    LI Yong,XU Lifu,ZHANG Shouren,et al. Gas bearing system difference in deep coal seams and corresponded development strategy[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(2):900−917.
    [3]
    秦勇,申建. 论深部煤层气基本地质问题[J]. 石油学报,2016,37(1):125−136.

    QIN Yong,SHEN Jian. On the fundamental issues of deep coalbed methane geology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(1):125−136.
    [4]
    李文镖,卢双舫,李俊乾,等. 页岩气/煤层气运移过程中的同位素分馏研究进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2022,49(5):929−942.

    LI Wenbiao,LU Shuangfang,LI Junqian,et al. Research progress on isotopic fractionation in the process of shale gas/ coalbed methane migration[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2022,49(5):929−942.
    [5]
    秦勇,唐修义,叶建平,等. 中国煤层甲烷稳定碳同位素分布与成因探讨[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2000,29(2):113−119.

    QIN Yong,TANG Xiuyi,YE Jianping,et al. Characteristics and origins of stable carbon isotope in coalbed methane of China[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2000,29(2):113−119.
    [6]
    宋岩,柳少波,洪峰,等. 中国煤层气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 石油学报,2012,33(增刊1):99−106.

    SONG Yan,LIU Shaobo,HONG Feng,et al. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of coalbed methane in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(Sup.1):99−106.
    [7]
    王相业,孙保平. 鄂尔多斯盆地兴县地区煤层气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(4):156−164.

    WANG Xiangye,SUN Baoping. Geochemical characteristics and their origin of CBM in Xingxian Area,Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(4):156−164.
    [8]
    鲍园,胡宜亮,李丹,等. 煤层甲烷碳同位素偏轻机理研究进展[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2021,41(6):1040−1049.

    BAO Yuan,HU Yiliang,LI Dan,et al. Advance on the genetic mechanism of lighter carbon isotopic composition in coalbed methane[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2021,41(6):1040−1049.
    [9]
    郭智栋,王玉斌,鲍园,等. 韩城地区煤层气成因类型及微生物开发潜力[J]. 西安科技大学学报,2023,43(3):539−548.

    GUO Zhidong,WANG Yubin,BAO Yuan,et al. Coalbed methane generation and microbial–development potential in Hancheng Block[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2023,43(3):539−548.
    [10]
    DUAN Yi,ZHANG Xiaoli,SUN Tao,et al. Carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions and their evolutions of gases generated by herbaceous swamp peat at different thermal maturity stages[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,2011,56(13):1383−1389. DOI: 10.1007/s11434-011-4356-8
    [11]
    琚宜文,李清光,颜志丰,等. 煤层气成因类型及其地球化学研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报,2014,39(5):806−815.

    JU Yiwen,LI Qingguang,YAN Zhifeng,et al. Origin types of CBM and their geochemical research progress[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2014,39(5):806−815.
    [12]
    MENG Zhaoping,YAN Jiwei,LI Guoqing. Controls on gas content and carbon isotopic abundance of methane in Qinnan–East coal bed methane block,Qinshui Basin,China[J]. Energy & Fuels,2017,31(2):1502−1511.
    [13]
    LI Yong,TANG Dazhen,FANG Yi,et al. Distribution of stable carbon isotope in coalbed methane from the east margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Science China Earth Sciences,2014,57(8):1741−1748. DOI: 10.1007/s11430-014-4900-x
    [14]
    李跃国,姚程鹏,杨曙光,等. 准南米泉地区煤层气成因及其富集成藏机理研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(4):220−226.

    LI Yueguo,YAO Chengpeng,YANG Shuguang,et al. Study on origin and accumulation mechanism of coalbed methane in Miquan Area of southern margin of Zhunggar Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(4):220−226.
    [15]
    唐淑玲,汤达祯,孙斌,等. 富(含)CO2煤层气多源多阶成因研究进展及勘探开发启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(3):58−68.

    TANG Shuling,TANG Dazhen,SUN Bin,et al. Research progress of multi–source and multi–stage genesis of CO2–enriched CBM and the enlightenments for its exploration and development[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(3):58−68.
    [16]
    杜世涛,赵明,廖方兴,等. 高倾角和“通天”双重特征煤层气勘探思考:以新疆煤层气储层为例[J]. 非常规油气,2024,11(2):1−8.

    DU Shitao,ZHAO Ming,LIAO Fangxing,et al. Thinking of CBM exploration with high dip angle and “open air” dual characteristics:A case of Xinjiang CBM reservoir[J]. Unconventional oil & Gas,2024,11(2):1−8.
    [17]
    刘会虎,兰天贺,胡宝林,等. 淮南潘集外围深部煤层气地球化学特征及成因[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(2):498−506.

    LIU Huihu,LAN Tianhe,HU Baolin,et al. Geochemical characteristics and its origins of CBM in deep–seated coal seam around Panji mining area of Huainan[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(2):498−506.
    [18]
    汤磊鑫,周虎,殷磊磊. 淮北地区含煤岩系有机地球化学特征及生烃潜力分析[J]. 非常规油气,2022,9(6):51–60.

    TANG Leixin,ZHOU Hu,YIN Leilei. Analysis on organic geochemistry characteristics and hydrocarbon-generating[J]. Unconventional oil & Gas,2018,43(2):498–506.
    [19]
    马晓强,邹婧芸,祝彦贺. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘临兴东区断阶带致密气富集规律研究[J]. 非常规油气,2023,10(3):1−7.

    MA Xiaoqiang,ZOU Jingyun,ZHU Yanhe. Study on enrichment law of tight gas in the fault step zone of Linxing east block,northeast margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2023,10(3):1−7.
    [20]
    李勇,吴鹏,高计县,等. 煤成气多层系富集机制与全含气系统模式:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块为例[J]. 天然气工业,2022,42(6):52−64.

    LI Yong,WU Peng,GAO Jixian,et al. Multilayer coal–derived gas enrichment mechanism and whole gas bearing system model:A case study on the Linxing Block along the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2022,42(6):52−64.
    [21]
    朱光辉,李本亮,李忠城,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘非常规天然气勘探实践及发展方向:以临兴–神府气田为例[J]. 中国海上油气,2022,34(4):16−29.

    ZHU Guanghui,LI Benliang,LI Zhongcheng,et al. Practices and development trend of unconventional natural gas exploration in eastern margin of Ordos Basin:Taking Linxing–Shenfu gas field as an example[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2022,34(4):16−29.
    [22]
    戴金星. 各类天然气的成因鉴别[J]. 中国海上油气(地质),1992,6(1):11−19.

    DAI Jinxing. Identification of various genetic natural gases[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology),1992,6(1):11−19.
    [23]
    熊小峰,郭潇潇,朱继田,等. 南海西部深水区气田天然气地球化学特征差异及其成因[J]. 天然气地球科学,2019,30(7):1053−1062.

    XIONG Xiaofeng,GUO Xiaoxiao,ZHU Jitian,et al. Causes of natural gas geochemical differences in the deep water area gas field,western South China Sea[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2019,30(7):1053−1062.
    [24]
    李勇,许卫凯,高计县,等. “源–储–输导系统”联控煤系气富集成藏机制:以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘为例[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(8):2440−2453.

    LI Yong,XU Weikai,GAO Jixian,et al. Mechanism of coal measure gas accumulation under integrated control of “source reservoir–transport system”:A case study from east margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(8):2440−2453.
    [25]
    陶传奇,李勇,倪小明,等. 临兴地区上石炭统本溪组煤成熟度演化过程研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2022,51(2):344−353.

    TAO Chuanqi,LI Yong,NI Xiaoming,et al. Study of the evolution process of coal maturity in upper Carboniferous Benxi Formation,Linxing Area[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2022,51(2):344−353.
    [26]
    SHEN Jian,LI Kexin,ZHANG Hewei,et al. The geochemical characteristics,origin,migration and accumulation modes of deep coal–measure gas in the west of Linxing Block at the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2021,91:103965. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103965
    [27]
    魏强,刘家乐,童家颖,等. 淮南潘集深部11–2煤层含气量与地球化学特征及其地质条件影响因素分析[J]. 宿州学院学报,2022,37(9):33−38.

    WEI Qiang,LIU Jiale,TONG Jiaying,et al. Analysis of gas content,geochemical characteristics and influencing factors of geological conditions of No. 11–2 coal seam from the Panji deep area in Huainan[J]. Journal of Suzhou University,2022,37(9):33−38.
    [28]
    刘恺德,姚凯文,陈能远,等. 黄陇煤田大佛寺井田煤层气成因机制研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2022,50(11):115−124.

    LIU Kaide,YAO Kaiwen,CHEN Nengyuan,et al. Formation mechanism of coalbed methane in Dafosi Mine Field,Huanglong Coalfield[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2022,50(11):115−124.
    [29]
    李洋冰,曾磊,胡维强,等. 保德地区煤层气地球化学特征及成因探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(2):133−141.

    LI Yangbing,ZENG Lei,HU Weiqiang,et al. Geochemical characteristics and genesis of coalbed methane in Baode Area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(2):133−141.
    [30]
    汤磊鑫,周虎,殷磊磊. 淮北地区含煤岩系有机地球化学特征及生烃潜力分析[J]. 非常规油气,2022,9(6):51−60.

    TANG Leixin,ZHOU Hu,YIN Leilei. Analysis on organic geochemistry characteristics and hydrocarbon–generating potential of coal–bearing strata in Huaibei Area[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2022,9(6):51−60.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(25)

    1. 王博睿,张远航. 含隐伏断层底板原生缺陷致灾前兆研究. 煤炭技术. 2025(01): 216-220 .
    2. 张雪莲. 潞安矿区矿井水害及防治措施分析. 华北自然资源. 2025(01): 14-16+20 .
    3. 连会青,晏涛,尹尚先,徐斌,康佳,周旺,闫国成. 基于透明水文地质模型的工作面顶板水害预警研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2025(01): 259-271 .
    4. 牛亚豪,王畅,刘佳佳. 基于高精度差分定位法的水文测量自动化报警系统设计. 自动化与仪器仪表. 2024(01): 231-234 .
    5. 苏雄,李小龙,贺杰伟. 基于三维GIS的煤矿数据集成自动化监测系统. 自动化与仪表. 2024(03): 121-125 .
    6. 郝宪杰,李航,赵毅鑫,杨怀翔,杨波,刘科峰,李宜家. 基于日累积微震指标与水位关联效应的底板突水预警方法与应用. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2024(09): 2125-2139 .
    7. 曾一凡,于超,武强,赵菱尔,尹尚先,张博成,刘泽洋,崔雅帅,阚雪冬,黄浩. 煤矿防治水“三区”划分方法及其水害防治意义. 煤炭学报. 2024(08): 3605-3618 .
    8. 宗伟琴. 煤矿水害监测预警GIS平台研发及应用. 能源科技. 2024(05): 28-33 .
    9. 姚有利,寇杰,张孟浩. 基于博弈论组合赋权-TOPSIS的煤矿“一通三防”风险评估. 矿业安全与环保. 2024(06): 71-78 .
    10. 赵群,郝韶嵩. 水害风险预警系统在皖北煤电集团的设计研究. 煤炭与化工. 2023(02): 33-37 .
    11. 丁莹莹,卜昌森,连会青,尹尚先,徐斌,张丐卓,姚辉,董其金. 基于仿真平台的矿井突水淹没路径和逃生路径规划. 煤矿安全. 2023(05): 20-26 .
    12. 董书宁. 人工智能技术在煤矿水害防治智能化发展中的应用. 煤矿安全. 2023(05): 1-12 .
    13. 袁利伟,龙皓楠,李斌,李延林,曹浪,辛岩. 基于HMM算法的矿山水灾害链复杂演化网络模型构建及应用. 化工矿物与加工. 2023(08): 47-55 .
    14. 曾一凡,武强,赵苏启,苗耀武,张晔,梅傲霜,孟世豪,刘晓秀. 我国煤矿水害事故特征、致因与防治对策. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(07): 1-14 .
    15. 尹尚先,徐斌,尹慧超,曹敏,丁莹莹,梁满玉. 矿井水防治学科基本架构及内涵. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(07): 24-35 .
    16. 邱浩,李宏杰,李文,李江华,杜明泽,姜鹏. 煤矿水害智能预警系统关键架构及模型研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(07): 197-206 .
    17. 李鑫,孙亚军,徐智敏,陈歌. 矿山采动突水危险源划分与致灾危险性评价研究. 煤炭工程. 2023(09): 108-115 .
    18. 张党育,武斌,贾靖,赵立松,李玉宝. 基于微震数据及模型的煤矿水害“双驱动”预警体系构建与应用. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(S1): 242-255 .
    19. 张志武. 高密度电阻率法在承压水导升高度探测中的应用. 煤. 2022(06): 71-72+95 .
    20. 宋容. 基于多层关联规则算法的煤矿突出预警模型. 能源与环保. 2022(06): 300-305 .
    21. 许进鹏,周宇,浦早红,庞思远. 离层积水量估算方法及离层突水预测——以陕西招贤煤矿1304工作面突水为例. 煤炭学报. 2022(08): 3083-3090 .
    22. 张辰宇. 基于5G通信技术的矿井开采工作面环境监测系统. 能源与环保. 2022(11): 220-225 .
    23. 卓聪志. 首采区域内上覆含水层的富水特征及采区涌水量计算. 山西化工. 2022(07): 112-114 .
    24. 隋旺华. 矿山安全地质学:综述. 工程地质学报. 2021(04): 901-916 .
    25. 薛峰峰. 低位岩巷穿层探放技术在采空区水害治理中的应用. 陕西煤炭. 2021(05): 155-158 .

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (190) PDF downloads (70) Cited by(34)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return