| Citation: |
XIA Daping，LIAO Jiajia，CHEN Zhenhong，et al. Favorable factors in methane production from residual coal post-biohydrogen generation[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration，2024，52(3)：56−63. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.10.0628
|
Determining favorable factors in methane production from residual coal post-biohydrogen production holds great theoretical and practical significance for improving the efficiency of methane production in the second stage of coal-based poly-generation. This study focuses on residual coal after hydrogen generation through anaerobic fermentation. Using coal samples from the Baiyinhua open-pit mine in Inner Mongolia as fermentation substrates, this study explored the dynamic trends of both the methane production and structure of the residual coal under different conditions by altering the aeration conditions and hydraulic retention time (HRT). Key findings are as follows: (1) Among the experiment groups with different atmosphere conditions, the CO2 group exhibited the highest methane production performance, with a unit gas production of 4.72 mL/g. In contrast, the gas production performance gradually decreased with an increase in the HRT. (2) The hydrogenase activity and gas production demonstrated similar laws of change. After reactions, all groups showed low chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the bacterial liquid. It is considered that CO2 can enhance bacterial enzyme activity, leading to a more pronounced CO2 methanation process. Besides, it can be inferred that a long HRT is not conducive to the survival of the microflora. Therefore, a short HRT is recommended the late engineering practices. (3) As discovered by the monitoring of the residual coal after anaerobic fermentation using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), the coal samples exhibited the largest aromatic carbon layer spacing when CO2 was introduced, with the numbers of some reactive functional groups, such as carboxyl and hydroxyl, in the coal decreasing. Under a HRT of 3 d, the microcrystalline structure and functional groups changed significantly. In contrast, a prolonged HRT corresponded to less pronounced changes in the coal structure. Therefore, injecting CO2 can not only improve the gas production rate but also change the macromolecular structure and pore structure of coal, thus enhancing the permeability, expansion, infiltration, and degradation of the coal seams themselves. Furthermore, the integration of geologic CO2 sequestration and coalbed methane bioengineering can be achieved.
| [1] |
王爱宽,秦勇. 生物成因煤层气实验研究现状与进展[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2010,38(5):23−27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.05.005
WANG Aikuan,QIN Yong. Research status and progress of experimental study on biogenic coalbed methane[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2010,38(5):23−27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2010.05.005
|
| [2] |
苏现波,陈鑫,王惠风,等. 不同厌氧发酵工艺对煤制氢的影响[J]. 煤炭转化,2013,36(2):16−19. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4248.2013.02.004
SU Xianbo,CHEN Xin,WANG Huifeng,et al. Influence of different anaerobic fermentation technologies on hydrogen production from coal[J]. Coal Conversion,2013,36(2):16−19. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4248.2013.02.004
|
| [3] |
周雨绮,曹麒,许俊超,等. 不同来源底物对厌氧发酵产氢余物产甲烷影响[J]. 环境工程,2021,39(9):123−130.
ZHOU Yuqi,CAO Qi,XU Junchao,et al. Influence of different source substrate systems on methanogenesis of residue from anaerobic fermentative hydrogen production using combined sludge and food waste[J]. Environmental Engineering,2021,39(9):123−130.
|
| [4] |
陈晨,马邕文,檀笑,等. La3+对产氢产甲烷厌氧反应器作用的研究[J]. 环境科学与技术,2017,40(增刊2):91−95.
CHEN Chen,MA Yongwen,TAN Xiao,et al. Research of effect of the La3+ on production of hydrogen and methane anaerobic reactor[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2017,40(Sup.2):91−95.
|
| [5] |
曹麒,何雨恒,卓桂华,等. 高温条件下初始pH对污泥–餐厨垃圾联合厌氧发酵产氢余物产甲烷的影响[J]. 环境工程,2022,40(9):150−157.
CAO Qi,HE Yuheng,ZHUO Guihua,et al. Effect of initial pH on the methane production from residue of anaerobic co–fermentative hydrogen production of sewage sludge and food waste under thermophilic operation[J]. Environmental Engineering,2022,40(9):150−157.
|
| [6] |
贾璇,任连海,李鸣晓,等. 芦苇酶解对氢气–甲烷联产过程微生物群落演替规律的影响[J]. 环境科学研究,2016,29(1):138−145.
JIA Xuan,REN Lianhai,LI Mingxiao,et al. Effects of enzymatic pretreatment on microbial community succession in hydrogen and methane coproduction from reed straw[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences,2016,29(1):138−145.
|
| [7] |
李丹,赵伟仲,李枫. 不同气相条件对单株产氢菌降解煤制氢的影响[J]. 煤炭转化,2019,42(5):61−66. DOI: 10.19726/j.cnki.ebcc.201905008
LI Dan,ZHAO Weizhong,LI Feng. Effects of different gas phase conditions from coal bed hydrogen–production[J]. Coal Conversion,2019,42(5):61−66. DOI: 10.19726/j.cnki.ebcc.201905008
|
| [8] |
郑继岱,徐国谦,储炬,等. 利用氧化还原电位调控乳酸发酵[J]. 生物加工过程,2008,6(5):73−77.
ZHENG Jidai,XU Guoqian,CHU Ju,et al. Using oxidation–reduction potential to optimize lactic acid production by lactobacillus paracasei[J]. Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering,2008,6(5):73−77.
|
| [9] |
乔玮,尹冬敏,刘月玲,等. HRT对餐厨垃圾与秸秆混合高温厌氧发酵的影响[J]. 中国环境科学,2017,37(12):4596−4604.
QIAO Wei,YIN Dongmin,LIU Yueling,et al. Effect of hydraulic retention time on thermophilic anaerobic co–digestion of food waste and straw[J]. China Environmental Science,2017,37(12):4596−4604.
|
| [10] |
姚海鹏,于东方,李玲,等. 内蒙古地区典型煤储层吸附特征[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33(2):1−8. DOI: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210201
YAO Haipeng,YU Dongfang,LI Ling,et al. Adsorption characteristics of typical coal reservoirs in Inner Mongolia[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2021,33(2):1−8. DOI: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210201
|
| [11] |
夏大平,陈曦,王闯,等. 褐煤酸碱预处理–微生物气化联产H2–CH4的实验研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(12):3221−3228.
XIA Daping,CHEN Xi,WANG Chuang,et al. Experimental study on the production of H2–CH4 from lignite jointly with acid–alkali pretreatment–microbial gasification[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(12):3221−3228.
|
| [12] |
刘雪梅,任南琪,宋福南. 微生物发酵生物制氢研究进展[J]. 太阳能学报,2008,29(5):544−549.
LIU Xuemei,REN Nanqi,SONG Funan. Recent advances in biohydrogen production by microbe fermentation[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica,2008,29(5):544−549.
|
| [13] |
张怀文. 基于不同发酵方式的煤制生物气过程生化代谢特征实验研究[D]. 焦作:河南理工大学,2020.
ZHANG Huaiwen. Experimental study on biochemical metabolism characteristics during biogas generation from coal based on different fermentation methods[D]. Jiaozuo:Henan Polytechnic University,2020.
|
| [14] |
郭红玉,赵树峰,陈振宏,等. 煤泥厌氧发酵转化生物甲烷的影响因素分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(增刊2):840−848. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2021.0504
GUO Hongyu,ZHAO Shufeng,CHEN Zhenhong,et al. Analysis of influencing factors of biological methane production with coal slime by anaerobic fermentation[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(Sup.2):840−848. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2021.0504
|
| [15] |
苏现波,赵伟仲,王乾,等. 煤层气井地联合抽采全过程低负碳减排关键技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(1):335−356. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.YG22.1326
SU Xianbo,ZHAO Weizhong,WANG Qian,et al. Conception of key technologies for low–negative carbon emission reduction in the process of coalbed methane development from the CBM well,coal mine and goaf[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(1):335−356. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.YG22.1326
|
| [16] |
ZHANG Lei,LI Jinghua,XUE Junhua,et al. Experimental studies on the changing characteristics of the gas flow capacity on bituminous coal in CO2–ECBM and N2–ECBM[J]. Fuel,2021,291:120115. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.120115
|
| [17] |
桑树勋. 二氧化碳地质存储与煤层气强化开发有效性研究述评[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2018,46(5):1−9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.001
SANG Shuxun. Research review on technical effectiveness of CO2 geological storage and enhanced coalbed methane recovery[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2018,46(5):1−9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.05.001
|
| [18] |
FU Changqing,DU Yi,SONG Wenlei,et al. Application of automated mineralogy in petroleum geology and development and CO2 sequestration:A review[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2023,151:106206. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106206
|
| [19] |
刘世奇,皇凡生,杜瑞斌,等. CO2地质封存与利用示范工程进展及典型案例分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2023,51(2):158−174. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.12.0998
LIU Shiqi,HUANG Fansheng,DU Ruibin,et al. Progress and typical case analysis of demonstration projects of the geological sequestration and utilization of CO2[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(2):158−174. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.12.0998
|
| [20] |
NIU Qigui,HOJO T,QIAO Wei,et al. Characterization of methanogenesis,acidogenesis and hydrolysis in thermophilic methane fermentation of chicken manure[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2014,244(3):587−596.
|
| [1] | HU Zhazha, ZHANG Xun, JIN Yi, GONG Linxian, HUANG Wenhui, REN Jianji, Norbert Klitzsch. A method for intelligent information extraction of coal fractures based on µCT and deep learning[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2025, 53(2): 55-66. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.24.09.0609 |
| [2] | HU Zhazha, ZHANG Xun, JIN Yi, GONG Linxian, HUANG Wenhui, REN Jianji, Norbert Klitzsch. Intelligent coal fracture extraction method using μCT and deep learning[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION. |
| [3] | CHEN Bo, TANG Dazhen, LIN Wenji, LI Song, ZHONG Guanghao, ZHU Xueguang. Geological modeling-based productivity response characteristics of the CBM well in Baode unitⅠ[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(5): 53-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.05.007 |
| [4] | LI Hengle, CAO Yunxing, ZHOU Dan, CHAI Xuezhou, LIU Tongji, FENG Peiwen, SHI Bin, TIAN Lin. Fracturing parameters analysis and productivity evaluation of vertical coalbed methane wells with nitrogen foam[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(3): 65-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.03.010 |
| [5] | HU Haiyang, JIN Jun, ZHAO Lingyun, CHEN Jie, GU Jiaoyang. Effects of pressure drop funnels model of different shapes on CBM well productivity[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(3): 109-116. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.03.018 |
| [6] | WANG Zhirong, YANG Jie, CHEN Lingxia, GUO Zhiwei. Productivity prediction of hypotonic CBM test well in Jiaozuo mining area under hydraulic fracturing[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2019, 47(3): 70-76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.03.012 |
| [7] | LIU Jia, CHEN Jun, RUI Fuxin, NING Xue, WANG Jianguo. Numerical simulation for effect of discrete fracture network on shale gas productivity of horizontal well[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(6): 66-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.06.011 |
| [8] | FENG Qing, TAO Honghua, HUANG Zijun, YANG Hao, YANG Bin, ZENG Ming, FAN Aibin. Prediction of CBM well productivity under variable permeability[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(1): 62-66. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2017.01.012 |
| [9] | LI Xiangchen, CHEN Defei, KANG Yili, MENG Xiangjuan. Characterization of pores and fractures of coal based on CT scan[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2016, 44(5): 58-62,70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2016.05.011 |
| [10] | SHI Wei, SANG Shuxun, ZHOU Xiaozhi, HUANG Huazhou, LIU Huihu, XU Hongjie. Analysis of the fracturing slit's delivery capacity in Qinshui basin[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2011, 39(3): 19-23,28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2011.03.004 |
Copyright of website design © Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration 陕ICP备05001372号-6
陕公网安备 61019002002193号
Address: Editorial Office of Coal Geology & Exploration, No.82 Jinye 1st Rd, High-Tech Zone, Xi'an City, Shaanxi, China
Tel: 029-81778075 E-mail: ccrimtdzykt@vip.163.com
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: