YANG Jinxian,CAI Jipeng. On-line compensation for geomagnetic error while drilling based on magnetic inertial slime mould algorithm[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(11):169−178. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.05.0301
Citation: YANG Jinxian,CAI Jipeng. On-line compensation for geomagnetic error while drilling based on magnetic inertial slime mould algorithm[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2023,51(11):169−178. DOI: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.23.05.0301

On-line compensation for geomagnetic error while drilling based on magnetic inertial slime mould algorithm

More Information
  • Received Date: May 30, 2023
  • Revised Date: August 11, 2023
  • In response to the serious distortion of the azimuth angle of the drilling tool caused by the large measurement error of strap-down micro-electro-mechanical-system (MEMS) magnetometer on the drilling tool in the measurement-while-drilling (MWD) environment, an online compensation method for the geomagnetic error of the drilling tool based on the magnetic-inertial slime mould algorithm (MISMA) was proposed. Firstly, the geomagnetic measurement error compensation model of the drilling tool was established through the analysis on the output error of the magnetometer, and the magnetometer error parameters were sorted into solution vectors. Then, the objective function of the ideal magnetic output data, the radial and tangential Pearson inequality of the drilling tool and the constraint condition of the magnetic field modulus were given based on the slime mould algorithm (SMA) according to the output characteristics of the magnetic-inertial sensor in the MWDhe gyroscope data, and the objective function was taken as the fitness function. In addition, the bounded global search range of the adaptive parameter control algorithm was designed with the ratio of the absolute value of the difference to the sum of the absolute values of the fitness value and the best fitness value of the solution vector of current error parameter to improve the MISMA search ability and convergence speed. Adaptively adjusting the random step (RS) by designing the Geomagnetic Modulus Ratio (GMR) could solve the problem that the SMA is prone to fall into local optimum. Moreover, the fitness value corresponding to the solution vector and the optimal solution vector of current geomagnetic error parameter was calculated and subjected to normalization processing and difference calculation successively. Meanwhile, the in-depth development threshold of the geomagnetic error parameter solution was obtained by combining the adaptive parameter values, and thus the quality of the vector solution of geomagnetic error parameters was further improved. Finally, the error compensation of the magnetometer was carried out to improve the azimuth angle accuracy of the drilling tool. Through simulation experiment and real drilling experiments, it is shown that: MISMA has smaller fitness value and faster decline speed compared with SMA under the same number of iterations. The convergence speed is increased by 37.99%, and the average absolute error of the azimuth angle of the drilling tool can be maintained within 2.37°. Generally, the research could improve the measurement accuracy of strap-down MEMS magnetometer on the drilling tool in coal mine, and it is an effective method to obtain the reliable azimuth angle of drilling tool.

  • [1]
    LUO Tao,YANG Hai,LIANG Haibo,et al. Research on the calibration method of MWD under the cooperation of multiple models[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal,2021,21(1):620−632. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3013887
    [2]
    SITARAMGUPTA V V S N,SAKORIKAR T,PANDYA H J. An MEMS–based force sensor:Packaging and proprioceptive force recognition through vibro–haptic feedback for catheters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,2022,71:4001911.
    [3]
    NING Zhiwen,FU Jun,CHANG Yang,et al. Improved MEMS magnetometer adaptive filter noise reduction and compensation method[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal,2022,22(2):1252−1264. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3130652
    [4]
    ZHANG Xiaojun,MAO Zekun,MA Yumeng,et al. Attitude magnetic measurement compensation method of fiber–optic submarine seismometer[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal,2022,22(13):13023−13029. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3154116
    [5]
    LIU Jianguo,LI Xiangang,YAN Shenggang,et al. A novel linear calibration model for three–axis fluxgate magnetometer[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal,2021,21(21):23917−23925. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3103992
    [6]
    CHAFI M R S,NARM H G,KALAT A A. Calibration of fluxgate sensor using least square method and particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials,2023,570:170364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170364
    [7]
    LIU Feng,WU Jiaqi,QUAN Wei. A genetic algorithm and backpropagation neural network based temperature compensation method of spin–exchange relaxation–free co–magnetometer[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments,2022,93(1):015102. DOI: 10.1063/5.0068036
    [8]
    LI Siran,MA Danyue,LU Jixi,et al. In situ calibration of triaxial coils of a vector optically pumped magnetometers based on a particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Measurement,2022,202:111878. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111878
    [9]
    CHEN Zhuo,WANG Zhenxiong,ZHANG Qi,et al. Dynamic compensation of a fluxgate magnetometer based on a hybrid optimizing algorithm[J]. Applied Sciences,2023,13(5):2830. DOI: 10.3390/app13052830
    [10]
    LI Shimin,CHEN Huiling,WANG Mingjing,et al. Slime mould algorithm:A new method for stochastic optimization[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems,2020,111:300−323. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2020.03.055
    [11]
    KABOLI S H A,ALQALLAF A K. Solving non–convex economic load dispatch problem via artificial cooperative search algorithm[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2019,128:14−27. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.002
    [12]
    WU Shubiao,HEIDARI A A,ZHANG Siyang,et al. Gaussian bare–bone slime mould algorithm:Performance optimization and case studies on truss structures[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review,2023,56:9051−9087. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10370-7
    [13]
    杨金显,杨闯,蒋志涛,等. 磁/惯性组合的钻具重力信息自适应提取[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(12):3331−3337. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0667

    YANG Jinxian,YANG Chuang,JIANG Zhitao,et al. Adaptive extraction of gravity information for drilling tool with magnetic and inertial integrated system[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(12):3331−3337. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0667
    [14]
    SHI Lingfeng,LIU Yuyu. Three−step autonomous calibration method for low–cost MEMS inertial/magnetic sensors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics,2022,58(5):4002112.
    [15]
    LI Supeng,CHENG Defu,WANG Yi,et al. Calibration of strapdown magnetic vector measurement systems based on a plane compression method[J]. Measurement Science and Technology,2023,34(5):055115. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/acbab0
    [16]
    LIU Zongwei,LEI Kan,SONG Jiancheng,et al. A designed calibration approach for the measurement−while−drilling instrument[J]. Applied Sciences,2023,13:61.
    [17]
    DONG Xiaofen,CHEN Guoguang,TIAN Xiaoli,et al. Real–time estimation of roll angles by magnetometer based on two–step adaptive Kalman filter[J]. Measurement,2022,198:111349. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111349
    [18]
    王坚,梁建,韩厚增. 低成本IMU的多位置旋转现场标定方法[J]. 中国惯性技术学报,2017,25(3):294−298. DOI: 10.13695/j.cnki.12-1222/o3.2017.03.003

    WANG Jian,LIANG Jian,HAN Houzeng. Method for low–cost IMU in−field calibration through multi–position rotation[J]. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology,2017,25(3):294−298. DOI: 10.13695/j.cnki.12-1222/o3.2017.03.003
    [19]
    PIOTROWSKI A P,NAPIORKOWSKI J J,PIOTROWSKA A E. Particle swarm optimization or differential evolution:A comparison[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2023,121:106008. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106008
    [20]
    YANG Jinxian,CHAO Lijun. A novel orientation recursive algorithm aiming at catastrophe signals in MWD[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,2020,67(11):9683−9692. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2955416
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(11)

    1. 张海涛,许光泉,陈晓晴,李旭,翟晓荣,李洋,李子璇. 我国闭坑煤矿矿井水水质演化研究进展与展望. 煤炭学报. 2024(09): 3944-3959 .
    2. 张雪丽,荀守奎. 闭坑矿井老空水位回升规律研究. 煤. 2023(04): 14-17 .
    3. 耿恒毅,翟晓荣. 基于Visual Modflow的刘东煤矿闭坑水位回升预测. 绿色科技. 2023(10): 121-125 .
    4. 郝红俊,翟晓荣,胡儒,庞瑶,黄楷,吴基文. 闭坑矿井积水对邻近生产矿井的影响. 工矿自动化. 2022(04): 60-65 .
    5. 杨岗. 分布式计算在闭坑矿井汇水过程的应用. 中国煤炭地质. 2021(12): 26-30+64 .
    6. 张文斌,吴基文,翟晓荣,胡儒,毕尧山,王广涛. 闭坑矿井矿界煤柱采动损伤及其安全性评价. 工矿自动化. 2020(02): 39-44 .
    7. 吴玉川,李磊. 废弃煤矿积水对相邻煤矿的威胁分析. 科学技术创新. 2020(18): 154-156 .
    8. 吴玉川,王东晟,孙冰,李磊. 受闭坑影响的矿井水流场演变研究. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2020(02): 7-8 .
    9. 才向军,韩瑞刚,孟璐,杨俊文. 赵各庄矿闭坑地下水安全警戒水位控制研究. 煤炭工程. 2020(09): 116-121 .
    10. 许延春,盖秋凯,黄磊,禹云雷,沈星宇,庞龙. 闭坑矿井积水对相邻生产矿井防治水的影响. 煤炭科学技术. 2020(09): 96-101 .
    11. 杨高峰,卫金善,杨新亮,窦文武. 晋城矿区凤凰山矿周边闭坑矿井水害分析及治理. 煤田地质与勘探. 2019(S1): 14-19 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(11)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (190) PDF downloads (34) Cited by(22)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return