ZHANG Libing, DONG Shouhua. Reception test and analysis of different geophones in coal mining districts seismic exploration[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(6): 33-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.005
Citation: ZHANG Libing, DONG Shouhua. Reception test and analysis of different geophones in coal mining districts seismic exploration[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(6): 33-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.005

Reception test and analysis of different geophones in coal mining districts seismic exploration

Funds: 

National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC0807803)

More Information
  • Received Date: October 14, 2020
  • Revised Date: November 12, 2020
  • Published Date: December 24, 2020
  • Seismic exploration faces many challenges, such as the uncertainty and multiple solutions of seismic results, the contradiction between short period and high expectation, the contradiction between high productivity and low signal-to-noise ratio, etc, which need to be solved urgently. Among them, the development of broadband acquisition has become the basis for broadening the bandwidth and improving the resolution ability. All-digital high-density 3D seismic exploration in coal mining area to improve the bandwidth and high resolution in seismic exploration has made obvious effect, the digital geophone single point reception and high density sampling way are used to achieve the wide azimuth seismic exploration, small surface and high folds, so in the process of seismic geophones for field data acquisition, the most critical acquisition front-end equipment, that its performance is good or bad, and collected data quality fit and unfit is directly related to the subsequent processing and interpretation. In order to compare the digital geophones and simulate the actual collection rate of detector, and to explore the field actual data acquisition of the difference between digital and analog detector performance, this paper used the low, medium and high frequencies of different analog detectors, single point of digital geophones with indoor six kinds of digital geophone array, the experiment was carried out, for the seismic records of different kinds of detectors, the frequency spectrum and the signal-to-noise ratio were analysis, it was found that the seismic signal frequency width and SNR of the digital geophones were superior to those of the analog detectors, and after the combination the bandwidth and the signal-to-noise ratio of the digital geophone were enlarged; In the analog geophones of low, medium and high natural frequency, the frequency width and the signal-to-noise ratio of the low-frequency analog geophone was better than that of the middle-high frequency analog geophones. In the case of high-density collection, when the stacking reaches a certain number, the signal-to-noise ratio of the seismic profiles does not change much, so the appropriate stacking times can be selected according to the signal of target layer of different depth.
  • [1]
    凌云. 地震数据采集处理解释一体化实践与探索[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社. 2007. LING Yun. Practice and exploration of integration of seismic data acquisition,processing and interpretation[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2007.
    [2]
    杨贵祥,高锐,仲伯军,等. 单点单分量高密度地震采集技术[C]//中国地球物理学会:中国地球物理学会论文集,2009:54-55.

    YANG Guixiang,GAO Rui,ZHONG Bojun,et al. High density seismic acquisition technology of applying single-point single-component[C]//Chinese Geophysical Society:China Geophysical Society,2009:54-55.
    [3]
    吕霖. 淮南矿区三维地震探采对比效果与实例分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2010,38(4):69-71.

    LYU Lin. Comparing 3D seismic prospecting with mining verification and case study in Huainan coal mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2010,38(4):69-71.
    [4]
    ONGKIEHONG L. A changing philosophy in seismic data acquisition[J]. First Break,1988,6(9):281-284.
    [5]
    张志锋,刘胜,刘远志,等. 数字检波器与模拟检波器采集效果对比[J]. 物探装备,2013,23(1):1-7.

    ZHANG Zhifeng,LIU Sheng,LIU Yuanzhi,et al. Acquisition data comparison between digital geophone and analog geophone[J]. Equiment for Geophysical Prospeting,2013,23(1):1-7.
    [6]
    徐锦玺,吕公河,谭绍泉,等. 检波器尾锥结构对地震采集信号的影响[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,1999,34(2):204-209.

    XU Jinxi,LYU Gonghe,TAN Shaoquan,et al. The influence of geophone tailcone structure upon acquired seismic signals[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospeting,1999,34(2):204-209.
    [7]
    芮拥军. 一种常规检波器的低频恢复方法[J]. 物探与化探,2016,40(6):1198-1202.

    RUI Yongjun. Low frequency recovery method for a conventional geophone record[J]. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration,2016,40(6):1198-1202.
    [8]
    孙超,孙亮,何登科,等. 倾斜检波器与地表双自由度耦合效应[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(4):206-211.

    SUN Chao,SUN Liang,HE Dengke,et al. Study on the effect of dual-freedom coupling between the tilt geophones and the surface[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(4):206-211.
    [9]
    EUISEOK O. Geophone characterization for improved geologic structure evaluation[D]. The Pennsylvania State University,1996.
    [10]
    BARZILAI A. Improving geophone to produce an affordable,broadband seismometer[D]. Californian:Mechanical Engineering Stanford University,2000.
    [11]
    ANDO B,BAGLIO S,BENINATO A,et al. A seismic sensor based on IPMC combined with ferrofluids[N]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,2012,62(5):1292-1298.
    [12]
    曹务祥. 模拟和数字检波器的资料响应特征对比分析[J]. 勘探地球物理进展,2007,30(2):96-99.

    CAO Wuxiang. Comparing analysis between data from analog geophone and DSU[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2007,30(2):96-99.
    [13]
    冯刚,毕丽飞,李建明,等. 单点数字检波器地震资料特点及处理对策[J]. 石油地球物理勘探,2008,43(增刊2):115-120.

    FENG Gang,BI Lifei,LI Jianming,et al. Seismic data character of single-point digital and processing strategy[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospeting,2008,43(Sup.2):115-120.
    [14]
    MOUGENOT D. How digital sensors compare to geophones?[J]. SEG Expanded Abstracts,2004,23(1):5-8.
    [15]
    MICHAEL S. Seismic sensing:Comparison of geophones and accelerometers using laboratory and field data[D]. Calgary:University of Calgary,2008
    [16]
    董世泰,高红霞. 单点单检波器地震勘探技术[J]. 石油仪器,2005,19(2):66-68.

    DONG Shitai,GAO Hongxia. Seismic exploration single with one point single geophone[J]. Petroleum Instruments,2005,19(2):66-68.
    [17]
    胡军辉,陈双廷,李虹,等. 单点数字检波器资料数字组合技术研究[C]//SPG/SEG南京2020年国际地球物理会议论文集(中文),2020:367-370.

    HU Junhui,CHEN Shuangting,LI Hong,et al. Research on digital combination technology of single-point digital geophone data[C]//Proceedings of SPG/SEG Nanjing 2020 International Geophysical Conference(Chinese),2020:367-370.
    [18]
    王泽丹,唐传章,王守东,等. 基于信噪比定量估算的采集参数设计方法[C]//SPG/SEG南京2020年国际地球物理会议论文集,2020:204-207.

    WANG Zedan,TANG Chuanzhang,WANG Shoudong,et al. Collection parameter design method based on signal to noise ratio quantitative estimation[C]//Proceedings of SPG/SEG Nanjing 2020 International Geophysical Conference(Chinese) 2020:204-207.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 樊亚男. CMK复合微粉对盐渍土物理力学性能的影响. 太原学院学报(自然科学版). 2024(02): 19-25 .
    2. 杨晓蕴,许丽,刘元珍. 湿、冻环境下工业固废协同水泥固化盐渍土强度特性研究. 混凝土. 2024(09): 181-186 .
    3. 文壮,金娇,刘帅,饶如意,宋战鹏,肖梦承,史金明. 活化煤矸石基改性沥青流变性能评价及微观机理. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(11): 4204-4216 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (143) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(7)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return