不同联合预处理对褐煤厌氧发酵产甲烷的影响

张怀文; 姚义清; 谢昌文

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.04.019

不同联合预处理对褐煤厌氧发酵产甲烷的影响

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.04.019

张怀文^1,,
姚义清^{1, 2, ,},
谢昌文³

基金项目:

陕西省高层次人才引进计划青年项目 A279021901

陕西省留学人员科技活动择优资助项目 2020002

陕西省重点研发计划项目 2020NY-114

详细信息

第一作者:
张怀文，1992年生，男，山西晋中人，博士研究生，研究方向为煤炭的高效生物转化. E-mail：1136636126@qq.com

通信作者:
姚义清，1986年生，男，陕西富平人，博士，教授，博士生导师，从事煤炭与生物质高效生物转化研究. E-mail：dzhtyao@126.com

中图分类号: P618.11
计量
- 文章访问数: 152
- HTML全文浏览量: 44
- PDF下载量: 16
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-02-08
- 修回日期: 2021-04-28
- 发布日期: 2021-08-25
- 网络出版日期: 2021-09-10

Effects of different combined pretreatments on biogenic methane production by anaerobic digestion of lignite

摘要

摘要: 高效实用的预处理方式对提高甲烷产量具有重要的作用，但单一的预处理方式往往较难获得满意效果，尤其是针对组成成分复杂的褐煤而言，对其后续产甲烷性能的影响更是存在不确定性。为探讨不同联合预处理对褐煤厌氧发酵产甲烷的影响，以1.00%HCl+5.00%H₂O₂(1号)、6.00%NaOH+5.00%H₂O₂(2号)、1.00%HCl+10.00 g木质素酶(3号)、6.00%NaOH+10.00 g木质素酶(4号)、5.00%H₂O₂+10.00 g木质素酶(5号)等不同联合预处理褐煤为实验组，未经预处理煤样为对照组(6号)，在适宜菌种来源和环境条件下进行厌氧发酵产甲烷实验。利用比色法、气质联用法、扫描电镜等对联合预处理产甲烷过程中的糖类、挥发性脂肪酸含量及煤降解特征进行分析，以揭示其影响机理。结果表明：①不同联合预处理均可以增加褐煤发酵产甲烷量。4与5号联合预处理效果较好，累积甲烷产量分别是20.36 mL/g与8.83 mL/g，相比6号对照样分别提高了24.24倍与10.51倍。②各实验组COD(化学需氧量)去除率均高于对照组，且反应前后菌液pH波动值小。③反应初期3号实验组多糖含量最低(0.37 μg/mL)，6号多糖含量最高(2.15 μg/mL)，且均呈现出先下降后上升的总体趋势。④ 2、3与5号实验组还原糖含量在整个反应过程中保持较高值，且反应末期各产气组糖类含量均不为零。⑤不同联合预处理均可以促进乙酸、丁酸的降解并提高产气率。不同条件下的褐煤产甲烷量与转化率变化特征，证实了联合预处理煤增产生物甲烷的有效性，可为煤制生物气技术的产业化应用提供借鉴。
- 褐煤 /
- 联合预处理 /
- 厌氧发酵 /
- 生物甲烷 /
- 糖类含量 /
- 挥发性脂肪酸
Abstract: It is crucial to choose efficient and practical pretreatment for increasing methane production. However, the treatment effect is often unsatisfactory through a single pretreatment method. In particular, it has an uncertain influence on the methane production of lignite with complex composition. In order to explore the effect of fermenting methane from lignite through the different joint pretreatment, with 1.00% HCl + 5.00% H₂O₂(group 1), 6.00% NaOH + 5.00% H₂O₂(group 2), 1.00% HCl + 10.00 g(group 3), 6.00% NaOH + 10.00 g(group 4), and 5.00% H₂O₂ + 10.00 g ligninase(group 5) as the experimental groups, and with the unpretreated coal samples (group 6) as the control group, the experiments of methane production through anaerobic fermentation were carried out under suitable strain sources and environmental conditions. The colorimetry, the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and the scanning election microscopy were used to analyze the saccharide, the volatile fatty acid content and the degradation characteristics n the process of joint pretreatment of methane so as to reveal its influence mechanism. The results showed the following: (1) Different joint pretreatment increased methane yield similarly. The treatment of groups 4 and 5 with the cumulative methane production up to 20.36 mL/g and 8.83 mL/g respectively, proved to be more effective for the degradation of coal. Compared with the group 6, the methane production of the two groups has increased by 24.24 and 10.51 times respectively. (2) The COD removal rate of each experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the pH variation was also relatively small. (3) At the beginning of the reaction, the lowest polysaccharide content belonged to group 3(0.37 μg/mL), whereas the highest number fell into group 6(2.15 μg/mL). The polysaccharide content of the two groups showed the same variation tendency(first decreasing and then increasing). (4) The reducing sugar contents of experimental groups 2, 3, and 5 remained at relatively high level on the whole. At the end of the reaction, the carbohydrate content of each gas-producing group was not zero. (5) All the joint pretreatments promoted the degradation of acetate and butyrate, and improved the carbon conversion rate. This research demonstrated the effectiveness of enhancing biogenic methane from coal through the joint pretreatment. It is hoped that the methods and the findings of this study may shed light on the industrialization applications of biogas production from coal.
- lignite /
- joint pretreatment /
- anaerobic fermentation /
- biogenic methane /
- carbohydrate content /
- volatile fatty acids

HTML全文

图 1 生物产气模拟装置

1—发酵瓶；2—瓶盖；3、6—穿刺钢针；4—液体取样口；5—气体取样口；7—橡胶软管；8—洗气瓶；9—集气装置

Fig. 1 Simulation device for biogenic gas production

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同联合预处理方式下累积甲烷产量变化特征

Fig. 2 Variation in cumulative methane production with different joint pretreatment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 COD质量浓度与pH值

Fig. 3 COD mass concentration and pH

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 多糖与还原糖含量

Fig. 4 Polysaccharide and reducing sugar content

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 各产气组转化率

Fig. 5 Conversion rates and carbon contents of each gas- producing group

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同联合预处理煤样形貌特征

Fig. 6 Surface morphologies of the coal samples after different joint pretreatment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 褐煤的工业和元素分析

Table 1 Proximate and ultimate analysis of lignite

工业分析ω/%				元素分析ω/%
M_ad	A_ad	V_ad	FC_ad	C_daf	H_daf	N_daf	(O+S)_daf
7.46	10.71	35.08	46.75	75.67	4.76	1.05	18.52

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 褐煤的联合预处理

Table 2 Joint pretreatment of lignite

实验编号	预处理方法	预处理条件
1	机械研磨+1%HCl+5%H₂O₂	先机械研磨，而后用HCl预处理24 h，再用H₂O₂预处理24 h
2	机械研磨+6.00% NaOH+5.00% H₂O₂	先机械研磨，而后用NaOH预处理24 h，再用H₂O₂预处理24 h
3	机械研磨+1.00% HCl+10.00 g木质素酶	先机械研磨，而后用HCl预处理24 h，再用木质素酶预处理24 h
4	机械研磨+6.00% NaOH+10.00 g木质素酶	先机械研磨，而后用NaOH预处理24 h，再用木质素酶预处理24 h
5	机械研磨+5.00% H₂O₂+10.00 g木质素酶	先机械研磨，而后用H₂O₂预处理24 h，再用木质素酶预处理24 h
6	机械研磨	—

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 各产气组发酵液内VFAs的质量浓度

Table 3 Mass concentrations of VFAs in the fermentation broth of each gas-producing group 单位: μg/mL

实验编号	乙酸	丙酸	丁酸	异丁酸	戊酸	异戊酸
1	12.38±0.85	1.08±0.19	2.30±0.12	0.21±0.18	0.03±0.01	2.23±0.24
2	11.48±0.92	1.56±0.10	0.12±0.06	0.27±0.07	0.01±0.00	0.07±0.01
3	11.91±1.43	2.61±0.95	9.60±1.71	3.88±0.09	0.04±0.01	4.33±0.29
4	10.56±1.06	2.57±0.34	5.80±0.65	0.21±0.05	0.02±0.00	0.28±0.15
5	10.49±1.38	2.30±0.38	12.35±1.42	4.13±0.27	0.15±0.05	0.41±0.08
6	14.52±0.78	2.01±0.16	12.63±0.59	0.20±0.06	0.02±0.01	0.54±0.07

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(32)

[1]	WANG Aikuan, SHAO Pei, LAN Fengjuan, et al. Organic chemicals in coal available to microbes to produce biogenic coalbed methane: A review of current knowledge[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 60: 40-48.. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.09.025
[2]	MAYUMI D, MOCHIMARU H, TAMAKI H, et al. Methane production from coal by a single methanogen[J]. Science, 2016, 354(6309): 222-225.. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8821
[3]	ROBBINS S J, EVANS P N, ESTERLE J S, et al. The effect of coal rank on biogenic methane potential and microbial composition[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2016, 154-155: 205-212.. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2016.01.001
[4]	王姗姗, 韩娅新, 何环, 等. 煤层水中一株产甲烷菌的分离与系统发育分析[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2014, 20(1): 123-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYHS201401021.htm WANG Shanshan, HAN Yaxin, HE Huan, et al. Isolation and phylogenic analysis of a methanogen from coal bed water[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2014, 20(1): 123-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYHS201401021.htm
[5]	PARK S Y, LIANG Yanna. Biogenic methane production from coal: A review on recent research and development on microbially enhanced coalbed methane(MECBM)[J]. Fuel, 2016, 166: 258-267.. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.121
[6]	夏大平, 黄松, 张怀文. 褐煤发酵制生物氢过程中关键液相产物的变化规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(8): 146-153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201908025.htm XIA Daping, HUANG Song, ZHANG Huaiwen. Transformation analysis of key liquid phase products during lignite fermentation to produce biological hydrogen[J]. Nature Gas Industry, 2019, 39(8): 146-153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201908025.htm
[7]	HARRIS S H, SMITH R L, BARKER C E. Microbial and chemical factors influencing methane production in laboratory incubations of low-rank subsurface coals[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2008, 76: 46-51.. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2008.05.019
[8]	HUANG Zaixing, URYNOWICZ M A, COLBERG P J S. Stimulation of biogenic methane generation in coal samples following chemical treatment with potassium permanganate[J]. Fuel, 2013, 111: 813-819.. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.03.079
[9]	HUANG Zaixing, URYNOWICZ M A, COLBERG P J S. Bioassay of chemically treated subbituminous coal derivatives using Pseudomonas putida F1[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 115: 97-105.. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.01.012
[10]	GUO Hongyu, LIU Xile, BAI Yang, et al. Impact of coal particle size on biogenic methane metabolism and its significance[J]. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 2016, 13(2): 1297-1301.. doi: 10.1166/jctn.2016.5046
[11]	DONG Pengwei, YUE Junrong, GAO Shiqiu, et al. Influence of thermal pretreatment on pyrolysis of lignite[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2012, 40(8): 897-905.. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(12)60033-4
[12]	席国赟, 张璐鑫, 王晓昌. 木质纤维素厌氧消化产甲烷的化学预处理方法研究进展[J]. 纤维素科学与技术, 2017, 25(2): 77-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XWSK201702011.htm XI Guoyun, ZHANG Luxin, WANG Xiaochang. Recent progress in study on chemical technology for pretreating lignocellulose to methane production in anaerobic digestion[J]. Journal of Cellulose Science and Technology, 2017, 25(2): 77-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XWSK201702011.htm
[13]	ZHANG Han, NING Zhifang, KHALID H, et al. Enhancement of methane production from cotton stalk using different pretreatment techniques[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 3463-3471.. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21413-x
[14]	CHEN Tianyuan, RODRIGUES S, GOLDING S D, et al. Improving coal bioavailability for biogenic methane production via hydrogen peroxide oxidation[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2018, 195: 402-414.. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2018.06.011
[15]	HAQ S R, TAMAMURA S, IGARASHI T, et al. Characterization of organic substances in lignite before and after hydrogen peroxide treatment: Implications for microbially enhanced coalbed methane[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2018, 185: 1-11.. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.11.009
[16]	CAI Jingling, WANG Guangce. Comparison of different pre-treatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from intertidal sludge[J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2016, 13(3): 292-297.. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2014.893436
[17]	HOSSEINI K E, DAHADHA S, BAZYAR LAKEH A A, et al. Enzymatic pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biomethane production: A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 233: 774-784. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314871
[18]	张怀文, 黄松, 闫夏彤, 等. 白腐真菌预处理对煤厌氧发酵产甲烷的影响[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(2): 120-125.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.02.019 ZHANG Huaiwen, HUANG Song, YAN Xiatong, et al. Effect of white rot fungi pretreatment on methane production from anaerobic fermentation of coal[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2020, 48(2): 120-125.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.02.019
[19]	赵星程. 厌氧污泥中微生物降解褐煤产甲烷的初步探究[D]. 天津: 天津理工大学, 2019. ZHAO Xingcheng. Preliminary study on microbial degradation of methane from lignite in anaerobic sludge[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Technology, 2019.
[20]	夏大平, 苏现波, 吴昱, 等. 不同预处理方式和模拟产气实验对煤结构的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(1): 129-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201301020.htm XIA Daping, SU Xianbo, WU Yu, et al. Effect of experimental of different pretreatment methods and simulating biogenic methane production on coal structure[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(1): 129-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB201301020.htm
[21]	夏大平, 陈曦, 王闯, 等. 褐煤酸碱预处理-微生物气化联产H₂-CH₄的实验研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 12(42): 3221-3228. XIA Daping, CHEN Xi, WANG Chuang, et al. Experimental study on the production of H₂-CH₄ from lignite jointly with acid-alkali pretreatment-microbial gasification[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 12(42): 3221-3228.
[22]	YADAV M, VIVEKANAND V. Combined fungal and bacterial pretreatment of wheat and pearl millet straw for biogas production: A study from batch to continuous stirred tank reactors[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 321: 124523. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852420317971
[23]	FARHAT A, ASSEs N, ENNOURI H, et al. Combined effects of thermal pretreatment and increasing organic loading by co-substrate addition for enhancing municipal sewage sludge anaerobic digestion and energy production[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 119: 14-22. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582018305226
[24]	HAFID H S, RAHMAN N A, SHAH U K M, et al. Enhanced fermentable sugar production from kitchen waste using various pretreatments[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 156: 290-298. http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20153202453.html
[25]	SU Xianbo, HONG Jiangtao, XIA Daping, et al. The variety and transition of key intermediate liquid products during the process of coal-to-biohydrogen fermentation[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(1): 568-579. doi: 10.1002/er.4303
[26]	GUO Hongyu, GAO Zhixiang, XIA Daping, et al. Simulation study on the biological methanation of CO₂ sequestered in coal seams[J]. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2019, 34: 171-179.
[27]	柳珊, 吴树彪, 张万钦, 等. 白腐真菌预处理对玉米秸秆厌氧发酵产甲烷影响实验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2013, 44(增刊2): 124-129. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJX2013S2025.htm LIU Shan, WU Shubiao, ZHANG Wanqin, et al. Effect of white-rot fungi pretreatment on methane production from anaerobic digestion of corn stover[J]. Transactions on the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 44(Sup. 2): 124-129. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYJX2013S2025.htm
[28]	张双全. 煤化学(第4版)[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2015. ZHANG Shuangquan. Coal chemistry(4rd Edition)[M]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology Press, 2015.
[29]	拜阳. 煤层产甲烷菌群的迁移特征研究[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2017. BAI Yang. Migration characteristics of methanogenic consortia in coal seam[D]. Jiaozuo: Henan Polytechnic University, 2017.
[30]	徐一雯, 蒋建国, 刘诺, 等. 预处理对厨余垃圾等有机废弃物联合厌氧发酵的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59(7): 558-566. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHXB201907009.htm XU Yiwen, JIANG Jianguo, LIU Nuo, et al. Effects of pretreatment on anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and other organic wastes[J]. J Tsinghua University(Science & Technology), 2019, 59(7): 558-566. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHXB201907009.htm
[31]	秦智, 任南琪, 李建政. 丁酸型发酵产氢的运行稳定性[J]. 太阳能学报, 2004, 25(1): 46-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYLX200401009.htm QIN Zhi, REN Nanqi, LI Jianzheng. Operational stability of butyric acid type fermentation in biological hydrogen production system[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2004, 25(1): 46-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYLX200401009.htm
[32]	陈雪, 李秀金, 张文海, 等. 酸化相发酵类型对甲烷相产甲烷性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(11): 6007-6013. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJJZ201711032.htm CHEN Xue, LI Xiujin, ZHANG Wenhai, et al. Effects of fermentation type of acidogenic phase on biomethane yield of methanogenic phase[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(11): 6007-6013. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJJZ201711032.htm