林子智, 卢双舫, 常象春, 李俊乾, 张鹏飞, 周能武, 张宇, 王军杰, 黄宏胜. 陆相页岩微观孔隙结构及分形特征——以徐家围子断陷沙河子组为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(1): 151-160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.016
引用本文: 林子智, 卢双舫, 常象春, 李俊乾, 张鹏飞, 周能武, 张宇, 王军杰, 黄宏胜. 陆相页岩微观孔隙结构及分形特征——以徐家围子断陷沙河子组为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(1): 151-160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.016
LIN Zizhi, LU Shuangfang, CHANG Xiangchun, LI Junqian, ZHANG Pengfei, ZHOU Nengwu, ZHANG Yu, WANG Junjie, HUANG Hongsheng. Micro-pore structure and fractal characteristics of terrestrial shales: A case study of Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(1): 151-160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.016
Citation: LIN Zizhi, LU Shuangfang, CHANG Xiangchun, LI Junqian, ZHANG Pengfei, ZHOU Nengwu, ZHANG Yu, WANG Junjie, HUANG Hongsheng. Micro-pore structure and fractal characteristics of terrestrial shales: A case study of Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2021, 49(1): 151-160. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.016

陆相页岩微观孔隙结构及分形特征——以徐家围子断陷沙河子组为例

Micro-pore structure and fractal characteristics of terrestrial shales: A case study of Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi Fault Depression

  • 摘要: 为揭示陆相页岩微观孔隙结构特征,应用低温氮气吸附-解吸实验,结合扫描电镜分析、有机碳测定及X射线衍射等手段,分析页岩有机质和矿物组成,厘清孔隙结构和分形特征,并探究其影响因素。结果表明:沙河子组陆相页岩矿物组成以黏土矿物、石英和长石为主。储集空间类型主要为黏土矿物粒内孔、长石溶蚀孔和颗粒边缘孔,有机孔隙不发育。氮吸附曲线主要呈现为Ⅳ类吸附曲线,发育H2和H3两类迟滞回线,其中H3型比表面积较低,平均孔径较大,宏孔含量较高。页岩孔体积主要由介孔和宏孔贡献,比表面积主要由介孔贡献。孔径分布呈现双峰态,左峰约为2.7 nm,右峰分布在20~70 nm。页岩发育两段分形特征,分形维数显示H3型页岩孔隙结构非均质性及复杂性较弱。孔隙结构主要受矿物组成控制,与TOC无明显相关性,微孔含量与比表面积越高,宏孔含量与平均孔径越高,页岩孔隙结构越复杂,越不利于页岩气的运移及产出。陆相页岩因沉积环境控制下赋存的腐殖型有机质,从本质上影响了其孔隙空间、孔隙结构及页岩气富集特征,与海相页岩区别显著。

     

    Abstract: The pore structure and fractal characteristics of shale are analyzed, and their impacting factors are also revealed using the low temperature nitrogen adsorption-desorption method, combined with scanning electron microscopy, C-S analysis and XRD. The results showed that the mineral compositions of Shahezi Formation continental shales were dominated by clay minerals, quartz and feldspar. The pore types in shales were mainly clay mineral intragranular pores, feldspar dissolution pores and grain edge pore, while the organic pores were not developed. The adsorption isotherms of shales belonged to the type Ⅳ isotherm according to the IUPAC, which develop two types of hysteresis loop, H2 and H3. The type H3 shales are characterized by a lower specific surface area, a larger average pore size, and a higher macro-pore content. Meso- and macro-pores mainly contribute to the total pore volume, while the meso-pores mainly contribute to the specific surface area. The pore size distribution was bimodal, characterized by a left peak at about 2.7 nm and the right peak at 20-70 nm. The shales showed two stages of fractal characteristics and the pore structures of type H3 shales were more homogeneous and simpler. The pore structures of Shahezi Formation shales were mainly controlled by the mineral composition rather than TOC. The higher the micropore content and the specific surface area value, the higher the macropore content and the average pore size, the more complex the shale pore structure, which is not conducive to the migration and production of shale gas. The differences between marine and terrestrial shale reservoirs are constrained by the differential sedimentary environments and the organic matter types, which fundamentally affected their pore structures and shale gas enrichment.

     

/

返回文章
返回