张利兵, 董守华. 煤矿采区地震勘探不同检波器接收试验与分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(6): 33-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.005
引用本文: 张利兵, 董守华. 煤矿采区地震勘探不同检波器接收试验与分析[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2020, 48(6): 33-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.005
ZHANG Libing, DONG Shouhua. Reception test and analysis of different geophones in coal mining districts seismic exploration[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(6): 33-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.005
Citation: ZHANG Libing, DONG Shouhua. Reception test and analysis of different geophones in coal mining districts seismic exploration[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2020, 48(6): 33-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.06.005

煤矿采区地震勘探不同检波器接收试验与分析

Reception test and analysis of different geophones in coal mining districts seismic exploration

  • 摘要: 地震勘探面临诸多挑战,地震成果的不确定性与多解性、短周期与高预期的矛盾、高生产率与低信噪比的矛盾等急待解决,其中开展宽频带采集已成为拓宽频带宽度、提高分辨能力的基础。全数字高密度三维地震勘探通过数字检波器单点接收,高密度采样的方式来实现地震勘探的宽方位角、小面元和高覆盖次数,因此,地震检波器作为野外数据采集过程中最为关键的采集前端设备,其性能的好坏及所采集的数据质量的优劣直接关系到后续的处理与解释等环节。为了对比数字检波器与模拟检波器的实际采集效果,并探讨在野外实际数据采集中数字与模拟检波器性能之间的不同,采用低、中、高不同固有频率的模拟检波器、单点数字检波器与室内数字检波器组合6种检波器进行接收试验,对不同类型检波器的地震记录进行频谱、信噪比等分析,发现数字检波器接收地震信号的频宽和信噪比优于模拟检波器,并且数字检波器室内组合之后频带宽度和信噪比均变大;在低、中、高固有频率的模拟检波器中,低频模拟检波器的频宽和信噪比效果好于中、高频模拟检波器;当高密度采集时,叠加达到一定次数时,剖面信噪比变化不大,因此,可以根据不同深度目的层信号选择合适的叠加次数。

     

    Abstract: Seismic exploration faces many challenges, such as the uncertainty and multiple solutions of seismic results, the contradiction between short period and high expectation, the contradiction between high productivity and low signal-to-noise ratio, etc, which need to be solved urgently. Among them, the development of broadband acquisition has become the basis for broadening the bandwidth and improving the resolution ability. All-digital high-density 3D seismic exploration in coal mining area to improve the bandwidth and high resolution in seismic exploration has made obvious effect, the digital geophone single point reception and high density sampling way are used to achieve the wide azimuth seismic exploration, small surface and high folds, so in the process of seismic geophones for field data acquisition, the most critical acquisition front-end equipment, that its performance is good or bad, and collected data quality fit and unfit is directly related to the subsequent processing and interpretation. In order to compare the digital geophones and simulate the actual collection rate of detector, and to explore the field actual data acquisition of the difference between digital and analog detector performance, this paper used the low, medium and high frequencies of different analog detectors, single point of digital geophones with indoor six kinds of digital geophone array, the experiment was carried out, for the seismic records of different kinds of detectors, the frequency spectrum and the signal-to-noise ratio were analysis, it was found that the seismic signal frequency width and SNR of the digital geophones were superior to those of the analog detectors, and after the combination the bandwidth and the signal-to-noise ratio of the digital geophone were enlarged; In the analog geophones of low, medium and high natural frequency, the frequency width and the signal-to-noise ratio of the low-frequency analog geophone was better than that of the middle-high frequency analog geophones. In the case of high-density collection, when the stacking reaches a certain number, the signal-to-noise ratio of the seismic profiles does not change much, so the appropriate stacking times can be selected according to the signal of target layer of different depth.

     

/

返回文章
返回