Discussion on identification standard of coal-measure graphite
-
摘要: 煤系石墨的鉴别及其类型划分,是矿产地质勘查和资源开发利用的前提条件和基础性工作,制定煤系石墨鉴定标准应遵循科学性、系统性、适用性和可操作性的原则。煤石墨化作用与煤化作用是连续递进加跃变的演化过程,煤系石墨的大分子结构阶跃性演化和物质组成非均质性等特点,造成矿种鉴别的复杂性。为制定科学实用的鉴定标准,从成矿机制研究和资源评价需求出发,按照矿石总体石墨化程度由高至低,划分了煤系石墨一号、二号、三号等3种类型;在前期工作的基础上,补充了110多组实测数据,修改完善了由初步鉴定指标和精确鉴定指标构成的煤系石墨鉴定指标体系。初步鉴定指标包括挥发分产率Vdaf和最大反射率Rmax,用于资源评价和地质勘查阶段初步区分煤与煤系石墨;精确鉴定指标包括晶面间距d002及其等效的石墨化度G、拉曼光谱参数R2,用以精确鉴别煤与煤系石墨,并划分煤系石墨类型。基于涵盖我国主要煤系石墨矿山500余组样品实测数据统计分析结果,确定了煤系石墨类型划分指标:煤系石墨一号,0.335 4 nm≤d002<0.338 0 nm(G>0.70)、R2<0.50;煤系石墨二号,0.338 0 nm≤d002<0.340 0 nm(G>0.50~0.70)、R2值范围0.50~0.60;煤系石墨三号,0.340 0 nm≤d002<0.344 0 nm(G>0~0.50),R2值范围0.50~0.60。根据上述指标,建立了煤系石墨鉴定模板,主要煤系石墨矿山样品测试数据表明,该鉴定模版具有实用性和可操作性。Abstract: The identification and classification of coal-measure graphite are the precondition and basic work of mineral geological exploration, as well as resource exploitation and utilization. The preparation of identification standards of coal-measure graphite should follow the principles of science, systematicness, applicability and operability. Coal graphitization and coalification is a continuous progression plus jump process, and the characteristics of coal-measure graphite, including the step evolution of macromolecular structure and the heterogeneity of material composition, leads to the complexity of ore identification. In order to establish the scientific and practical identification standards, and from the study of metallogenic mechanism and the demand of resource evaluation, coal-measure graphite was divided into three types: No.1, No.2 and No.3, according to the graphitization degree of the ore as a whole ranges from high to low. On the basis of the previous work, more than 110 groups of measured data were added, and the identification index system of coal-measure graphite composed of the preliminary and precise identification indexes was modified and perfected. The preliminary identification indexes, including the volatile yield Vdaf and the maximum reflectivity Rmax, are used to roughly distinguish coal and coal-measure graphite in the stage of resource evaluation and geological exploration. The precise identification indexes, including the interplanar spacing d002, its equivalent graphitization degree G, and Raman spectrum parameter R2, are used to accurately distinguish coal and coal-measure graphite, and to classify the types of coal-measure graphite. Besides, the classification indexes of coal-measure graphite were determined based on the statistical analysis results of the measured data of over 500 groups of samples from the main coal-measure graphite mines in our country, including No.1 coal-measure graphite with 0.335 4 nm ≤ d002 < 0.338 0 nm (G > 0.70) and R2 < 0.50; No.2 coal-measure graphite with 0.338 0 nm ≤ d002 < 0.340 0 nm (G>0.50−0.70) and R, 0.50−0.60; and No. 3 coal-measure graphite with 0.340 0 nm ≤ d002 < 0.344 0 nm (G>0−0.50) and R, 0.50−0.60. Thus, an identification template of coal-measure graphite was established based on the above indexes, which was practical and operable according to the test data of samples from the main coal-measure graphite mines.
-
Key words:
- coal-measure graphite /
- identification standard /
- index /
- classification /
- identification template
-
表 1 煤系石墨测试分析方法
Table 1 Testing and analysis methods of coal-measure graphite
大类 方法 成分分析 (1) 光学显微镜观察:石墨组分鉴别
(2) 工业分析:固定碳、挥发分
(3) 元素分析:C、H结构分析 (1) 反射率测试
(2) X射线衍射分析
(3) 激光拉曼光谱分析
(4) 扫描电镜
(5) 透射电镜物化性质分析 电学性质、热分析、密度、孔隙率、机械
性质等表 2 煤系石墨鉴定指标
Table 2 Identification index of coal-measure graphite
类型 初步鉴定指标 精确鉴定指标 Vdaf/% Rmax/% d002/nm 石墨化度G① R2② 煤系
石墨一号 <5.0 >6.0 <0.3380~0.3354 >0.70 <0.50 二号 <0.3400~0.3380 >0.50~0.70 0.50~0.60 三号 <0.3440~0.3400 >0~0.50 煤 ≥0.3440 ≤0 >0.60 注:① G=(0.3440 nm−d002)/(0.3440 nm−0.3354 nm);② R2=AD1/(AD1+AD2+AG),其中AD1、AD2、AG分别为D1、D2和G峰面积。 -
[1] 孙升林,吴国强,曹代勇,等. 煤系矿产资源及其发展趋势[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2014,26(11):1−11.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2014.11.01SUN Shenglin,WU Guoqiang,CAO Daiyong,et al. Mineral resources in coal measures and development trend[J]. Coal Geology of China,2014,26(11):1−11.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2014.11.01 [2] 曹代勇,张鹤,董业绩,等. 煤系石墨矿产地质研究现状与重点方向[J]. 地学前缘,2017,24(5):317−327.CAO Daiyong,ZHANG He,DONG Yeji,et al. Research status and key orientation of coal−based graphite mineral geology[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2017,24(5):317−327. [3] 曹代勇,王路,刘志飞,等. 我国煤系石墨研究及资源开发利用前景[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(1):1−11.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.01.001CAO Daiyong,WANG Lu,LIU Zhifei,et al. The research status and prospect of coal–based graphite in China[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(1):1−11.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.01.001 [4] 王德利,任辉,张宇航,等. 我国煤系石墨资源开发利用现状及对策建议探讨[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2022,34(6):8−10.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2022.06.02WANG Deli,REN Hui,ZHANG Yuhang,et al. Probe into coal measures graphite resources exploitation and utilization status quo in China and countermeasures proposal[J]. Coal Geology of China,2022,34(6):8−10.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2022.06.02 [5] 董业绩,曹代勇,王路,等. 地质勘查阶段煤系石墨与无烟煤的划分指标探究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2018,46(1):8−12.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.002DONG Yeji,CAO Daiyong,WANG Lu,et al. Indicators for partitioning graphite and anthracite in coal measures during geological exploration phase[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2018,46(1):8−12.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.002 [6] CAO Daiyong,ZHANG He,DONG Yeji,et al. Nanoscale microscopic features and evolution sequence of coal–based graphite[J]. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,2017,17(9):6276−6283.. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2017.14403 [7] LI Kuo,RIMMER S M,LIU Qinfu. Geochemical and petrographic analysis of graphitized coals from central Hunan,China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2018,195:267−279.. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2018.06.009 [8] 刘钦甫,袁亮,李阔,等. 不同变质程度煤系石墨结构特征[J]. 地球科学,2018,43(5):1663−1669.LIU Qinfu,YUAN Liang,LI Kuo,et al. Structure characteristics of different metamorphic grade coal−based graphites[J]. Earth Science,2018,43(5):1663−1669. [9] WANG Lu,CAO Daiyong,PENG Yangwen,et al. Strain−induced graphitization mechanism of coal−based graphite from Lutang,Hunan Province,China[J]. Minerals,2019,9(10):617.. doi: 10.3390/min9100617 [10] 冯杨伟,吕录仕. 陕西凤县石炭系煤系石墨矿床地质特征及成因探讨[J]. 中国煤炭,2018,44(7):44−48.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-530X.2018.07.008FENG Yangwei,LYU Lushi. Analysis of geological characteristics and genesis of Carboniferous coal–based graphite deposit in Fengxian County,Shaanxi Province[J]. China Coal,2018,44(7):44−48.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-530X.2018.07.008 [11] 王路,曹代勇,丁正云,等. 闽西南地区煤成石墨的控制因素与成矿区带划分[J]. 煤炭学报,2020,45(8):2865−2871.. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2019.0690WANG Lu,CAO Daiyong,DING Zhengyun,et al. Controlling factors and metallogenic belts of coal−based graphite in the south−western Fujian Province[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2020,45(8):2865−2871.. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2019.0690 [12] 丁正云,曹代勇,王路,等. 福建漳平可坑矿区煤系石墨赋存规律研究[J]. 地质力学学报,2019,25(2):198−205.. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.02.018DING Zhengyun,CAO Daiyong,WANG Lu,et al. Study on occurrence regularity of coal–based graphite in Kekeng mining area in Zhangping,Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Geomechanics,2019,25(2):198−205.. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2019.25.02.018 [13] 李阳,王路,曹代勇,等. 江西崇义矿煤成石墨的发现及其地质意义[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(5):79−85.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.05.011LI Yang,WANG Lu,CAO Daiyong,et al. The discovery and geological significance of coal–formed graphite in Chongyi coal mine in Jiangxi Province[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2019,47(5):79−85.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.05.011 [14] 陈泉霖,程乔,邓瑞锦,等. 福建煤系石墨资源状况和开发前景[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(1):12−17.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.01.002CHEN Quanlin,CHENG Qiao,DENG Ruijin,et al. Status and development prospect of the coal−based graphite resources in Fujian Province[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(1):12−17.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.01.002 [15] 莫佳峰,赵训林,朱文卿,等. 湖南省煤系石墨成矿规律与找矿方向探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(1):18−26.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.01.003MO Jiafeng,ZHAO Xunlin,ZHU Wenqing,et al. Metallogenic law and prospecting direction of coal−based graphite in Hunan Province[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(1):18−26.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.01.003 [16] 程乔,陈泉霖,曹代勇,等. 福建省煤系石墨成矿模式初步探讨[J]. 中国煤炭地质,2021,33(11):11−13.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2021.11.03CHENG Qiao,CHEN Quanlin,CAO Daiyong,et al. Preliminary discussion on coal measures graphite minerogenic mode in Fujian Province[J]. Coal Geology of China,2021,33(11):11−13.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2021.11.03 [17] 曹代勇,魏迎春,李阳,等. 煤系石墨鉴别指标厘定及分类分级体系构建[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(6):1833−1846.CAO Daiyong,WEI Yingchun,LI Yang,et al. Determination of identification index and construction of classification and classification system of coal measures graphite[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(6):1833−1846. [18] 曹代勇,刘志飞,王安民,等. 构造物理化学条件对煤变质作用的控制[J]. 地学前缘,2022,29(1):439−448.. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.12.11CAO Daiyong,LIU Zhifei,WANG Anmin,et al. Control of coal metamorphism by tectonic physicochemical conditions[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2022,29(1):439−448.. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2020.12.11 [19] 秦勇. 中国高煤级煤的显微岩石学特征及结构演化[M]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 1994. [20] KWIECIŃSKA B,PETERSEN H I. Graphite,semi−graphite,natural coke,and natural char classification:ICCP system[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2004,57:99−116.. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2003.09.003 [21] RODRIGUES S,MARQUES M,SUÁREZ–RUIZ I,et al. Microstructural investigations of natural and synthetic graphites and semi–graphites[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology,2013,111:67−79.. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.06.013 [22] BUSECK P R,BEYSSAC O. From organic matter to graphite:Graphitization[J]. Elements,2014,10(6):421−426.. doi: 10.2113/gselements.10.6.421 [23] CAO Daiyong,WANG Lu,DING Zhengyun,et al. Characterization of the heterogeneous evolution of the nanostructure of coal–based graphite[J]. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,2021,21(1):670−681.. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2021.18726 [24] 王路. 煤系石墨的构造–热成矿机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2020.WANG Lu. Study on the tectonic–thermal metallogenic mechanism of the coal–based graphite[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 2020. [25] 李久庆,秦勇,陈义林. 超无烟煤中石墨微晶产出状态与成因[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2020,48(1):27−33.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.01.004LI Jiuqing,QIN Yong,CHEN Yilin. Occurrence and origin of graphite microcrystal in meta–anthracite[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2020,48(1):27−33.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2020.01.004 [26] 李阔,刘钦甫,张帅,等. 煤系石墨显微组分与结构特征[J]. 矿物学报,2021,41(1):101−108.LI Kuo,LIU Qinfu,ZHANG Shuai,et al. Characteristics of microscopically distinguishable components and structures of the coaly graphite[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica,2021,41(1):101−108. [27] 曹代勇, 宁树正, 郭爱军, 等. 中国煤田构造格局与构造控煤作用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017. [28] 杨起, 吴冲龙, 汤达祯, 等. 中国煤变质作用[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1996. [29] OBERLIN A. Carbonization and graphitization[J]. Carbon,1984,22(6):521−541.. doi: 10.1016/0008-6223(84)90086-1 [30] 郑辙. 煤基石墨微结构的高分辨电镜研究[J]. 矿物学报,1991,11(3):214−218.. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.1991.03.004ZHENG Zhe. HRTEM studies of microstructures of coal–based graphite[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica,1991,11(3):214−218.. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4734.1991.03.004 [31] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 中国煤炭分类: GB/T 5751—2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. [32] International Standard. Classification of coals: ISO 11760: 2018[S]. Switzerland: ISO Copyright Office, 2018. [33] FRANKLIN R E. The structure of graphitic carbons[J]. Acta Crystallographica,1951,4(3):253−261.. doi: 10.1107/S0365110X51000842 [34] 李焕同,曹代勇,张卫国,等. 高煤级煤石墨化轨迹阶段性的XRD和Raman光谱表征[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析,2021,41(8):2491−2498.LI Huantong,CAO Daiyong,ZHANG Weiguo,et al. XRD and Raman spectroscopy characterization of graphitization trajectories of high−rank coal[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis,2021,41(8):2491−2498.