西湖凹陷平南地区新生代火山机构特征

孙乃泉, 江东辉, 潘杰, 高阳, 蒲仁海, 董新旭

孙乃泉, 江东辉, 潘杰, 高阳, 蒲仁海, 董新旭. 西湖凹陷平南地区新生代火山机构特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探.
引用本文: 孙乃泉, 江东辉, 潘杰, 高阳, 蒲仁海, 董新旭. 西湖凹陷平南地区新生代火山机构特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探.
SUN Naiquan, Jiang Donghui, PAN Jie, GAO Yang, PU Renhai, DENG Xinxue. Characteristics of Cenozoic volcanic mechanism in Pingnan area of Xihu Sag[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION.
Citation: SUN Naiquan, Jiang Donghui, PAN Jie, GAO Yang, PU Renhai, DENG Xinxue. Characteristics of Cenozoic volcanic mechanism in Pingnan area of Xihu Sag[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION.

 

西湖凹陷平南地区新生代火山机构特征

基金项目: 

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFB2600402)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    孙乃泉,1977年生,男,黑龙江哈尔滨人,博士,副教授。E-mail:nqsun@chd.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: P618.11

Characteristics of Cenozoic volcanic mechanism in Pingnan area of Xihu Sag

  • 摘要: 【研究意义】 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带南部火成岩发育,岩浆活动导致的局部地温升高对烃源岩热演化和砂岩储层次生孔隙形成具有重要影响,同时也是区域构造运动的一个重要指示,对于理解区域地质历史具有重要意义。【目的和方法】 为明确西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带南部盖层火成岩形成期次和分布规律,综合前人研究成果和邻区数据,利用三维地震数据及相关属性,结合钻井、录井和测井资料,分析了火山岩类型、分布地层和范围;通过地层年代学、火山机构形态及其与围岩的接触关系,探讨了火成岩的形成期次。【结果和结论】 研究结果表明:(1) 平南地区火成岩地震相可分为火山通道相、爆发相、溢流相和侵入相,其中盾状火山机构和丘状火山机构最为发育。(2) 岩浆活动可分为三期,中新世末期区域性龙井运动岩浆活动最为强烈,影响范围最广;玉泉组沉积晚期和三潭组沉积早期为局部小规模构造运动,岩浆活动较弱,影响较小。(3) 研究区发育5个与岩浆活动有关的岩性、低幅度披覆背斜和断裂复合圈闭。研究成果为后续西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带南部油气勘探开发提供参考。
    Abstract: [Research Significance] Cenozoic igneous rocks are well developed in the southern pinghu slope zone of Xihu Depression. Local warming caused by magmatic activity has an important influence on the thermal evolution of source rocks and the formation of secondary pores in sandstone reservoirs, and magmatic activity is also the "pointer" of regional tectonic movement. [Purpose and methods] Based on 3d seismic data, seismic facies, volcanic mechanism and distribution horizon of igneous rocks in Pingnan area were identified and characterized. [Results and conclusions] The following three understandings were obtained in combination with previous studies on regional tectonic evolution: 1) Seismic facies of igneous rocks in the study area can be divided into volcanic channel facies, eruptive facies, overflow facies and intrusive facies. Shield volcanic mechanism and mound volcanic mechanism are mainly developed, and longjing movement accompanied by volcanic activity in the late Miocene. 2) The local warming of magmatic activity is favorable to the thermal evolution of source rocks and the formation of secondary pores in deep consolidated sandstone reservoirs; 3) There are five lithologic traps related to magmatic activity, low amplitude drape anticline and fault compound traps in the study area.
  • [1] 龚建明,陈国威. 西湖凹陷东部断阶带火成岩的分布特征[J]. 中国海上油气地质,1995,7(1):13-17.

    GONG Jianming,CHEN Guowei. The distribution of igneous rocks in the eastern fault zone of Xihu sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,1995,7(1):13-17.

    [2] 朱立新. 西湖凹陷新生代火成岩发育特征及区域背景分析[J]. 海洋石油,2016,36(3):1-7.

    ZHU Lixin. Characteristics and regional background of Cenozoic igneous rocks in Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil,2016,36(3):1-7.

    [3] 张卫华,郭全仕. 平南地区火成岩分布特征及其对圈闭形成的影响[J]. 勘探地球物理进展,2004(5):359-362.

    ZHANG Weihua,GUO Quanshi. The distributional characteristics of igneous rock and its effect on the formation of traps in Pingnan area[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics,2004(5):359-362.

    [4] 周静毅,段文豪,刘明阳,等. 西湖凹陷天台西地区火成岩的识别及其在勘探中的应用[J]. 海洋石油,2017,37(4):35-40.

    ZHOU Jingyi,DUAN Wenhao,LIU Mingyang,et al. Identification of igneous rocks and its application in exploration in the west of Tiantai area of Xihu Sag[J]. Offshore Oil,2017,37(4):35-40.

    [5] 望雪怡,刘强虎,朱红涛,等. 西湖凹陷天台斜坡带火山机构三维雕刻及成因机制解析[J]. 地质科技通报,2021,40(4):72-80.

    WANG Xueyi,LIU Qianghu,ZHU Hongtao,et al. 3-D engraving of volcanic mechanism in the Tiantai slope of Xihu Depression and its formation mechanism[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2021,40(4):72-80.

    [6] 胡惠娟,陶国保. 东海西湖凹陷第三纪岩浆活动与油气聚集的关系[J]. 海洋地质译丛,1997,17(3):13-19.

    HU Huijuan,TAO Guobao. Tertiary magmatism and its relationaship with oil/gas accumulation in the Xihu sag,the East China Sea[J]. Offshore Oil,1997,17(3):13-19.

    [7] 周瑾. 西湖凹陷中央背斜带两种热体制下烃源岩的热演化[J]. 中国海上油气. 地质,2003,15(1):64-68.

    ZHOU Jin. Thermal evolution of source rocks under two thermal systems in the central anticlinal zone in Xihu sag,East China Sea basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2003,15(1):64-68.

    [8] 高伟中,杨彩虹,赵洪. 东海盆地西湖凹陷热事件对储层的改造及其机理探讨[J]. 石油实验地质,2015,37(5):548-554.

    GAO Weizhong,YANG Caihong,ZHAO Hong. Reservoir formation and modification controlled by thermal events in the Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2015,37(5):548-554.

    [9] 周心怀,蒋一鸣,唐贤君. 西湖凹陷成盆背景、原型盆地演化及勘探启示[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(3):1-10.

    ZHOU Xinhuai,JIANG Yiming,TANG Xianjun. Tectonic setting,prototype basin evolution and exploration enlightenment of Xihu sag in East China Sea basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(3):1-10.

    [10] 田杨,叶加仁,雷闯,等. 断陷盆地海陆过渡相烃源岩发育模式:以西湖凹陷平湖组为例[J]. 地球科学,2019,44(3):898-908.

    TIAN Yang,YE Jiaren,LEI Chuang,et al. Development model for source rock of marine-continental transitional face in faulted basins:A case study of Pinghu formation in Xihu Sag[J]. Earth Science,2019,44(3):898-908.

    [11] 蒋一鸣,邹玮,刘金水,等. 东海西湖凹陷中新世末反转背斜构造成因机制:来自基底结构差异的新认识[J]. 地球科学,2020,45(3):968-979.

    JIANG Yiming,ZOU Wei,LIU Jinshui,et al. Genetic mechanism of inversion anticline structure at the end of Miocene in Xihu Sag,East China Sea:A new understanding of basement structure difference[J]. Earth Science,2020,45(3):968-979.

    [12]

    MITCHUM R M J, VAIL P R, Thompson S I. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, part 2: the depositional sequence as a basic unit for stratigraphy analysis[M]. 1977.

    [13] 董鑫旭,周兴海,李昆,等. 海上稀疏井区高精度地层格架约束下的地震沉积学刻画:以东海盆地西湖凹陷中央背斜带X区块古近系花港组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2024,45(1):293-308.

    DONG Xinxu,ZHOU Xinghai,LI Kun,et al. Seismic sedimentological characterization of an offshore area with sparse well control under the constraint of a high-resolution stratigraphic framework:A case study of the Paleogene Huagang formation in block X of the central anticlinal zone in the Xihu[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2024,45(1):293-308.

    [14]

    WIDESS M B. Quantifying resolving power of seismic systems[J]. Geophysics,1982,47(8):1160-1173.

    [15]

    Meckel L, Nath A.Geologic Considerations for Stratigraphic Modeling and Interpretation: Section 3. Stratigraphic Models from Seismic Data[J]. 1977.

    [16]

    ANSTEY N A. Seismic exploration for sandstone reservoirs[M]. DordrechtSpringer Netherlands,1980

    [17]

    BROWN A R. Interpretation of three-dimensional seismic data[M]. 7th ed. Okla:Published jointly by American Association of Petroleum Geologists and the Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2011.

    [18]

    XU Guoqiang,HAQ B U. Seismic facies analysis:Past,present and future[J]. Earth-Science Reviews,2022,224:103876.

    [19] 马江涛,刘洋,张浩然. 地震相智能识别研究进展[J]. 石油物探,2022,61(2):262-275.

    MA Jiangtao,LIU Yang,ZHANG Haoran. Research progress on intelligent identification of seismic facies[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2022,61(2):262-275.

    [20] 王璞珺,迟元林,刘万洙,等. 松辽盆地火山岩相:类型、特征和储层意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(4):449-456.

    WANG Pujun,CHI Yuanlin,LIU Wanzhu,et al. Volcanic facies of the Songliao Basin:Classification,characteristics and reservoir significance[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology,2003,33(4):449-456.

    [21] 冯玉辉,黄玉龙,丁秀春,等. 辽河盆地东部凹陷中基性火山岩相地震响应特征及其机理探讨[J]. 石油物探,2014,53(2):206-215.

    FENG Yuhui,HUANG Yulong,DING Xiuchun,et al. Relationship between intermediate-mafic volcanic facies and their corresponding seismic reflections:A case study from eastern depression of Liaohe Basin[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2014,53(2):206-215.

    [22] 谢家莹,蓝善先,张德宝,等. 运用火山地质学理论研究竹田头火山机构[J]. 火山地质与矿产,2000,21(2):87-95.

    XIE Jiaying,LAN Shanxian,ZHANG Debao,et al. The study on revived caldera using volcanology[J]. Volcanology & Mineral Resources,2000,21(2):87-95.

    [23] 唐华风,庞彦明,边伟华,等. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山机构储层定量分析[J]. 石油学报,2008,29(6):841-845.

    TANG Huafeng,PANG Yanming,BIAN Weihua,et al. Quantitative analysis on reservoirs in volcanic edifice of Early Cretaceous Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008,29(6):841-845.

    [24] 孙希家,张新涛,华晓莉,等. 火山发育区通道相类型、特征、成因及对油气的控制作用[J]. 地质论评,2018,64(4):937-946.

    SUN Xijia,ZHANG Xintao,HUA Xiaoli,et al. Types,characteristics,causes and control of hydrocarbon of the conduit facies in the volcanic development zone[J]. Geological Review,2018,64(4):937-946.

    [25] 姜传金,陈树民,初丽兰,等. 徐家围子断陷营城组火山岩分布特征及火山喷发机制的新认识[J]. 岩石学报,2010,26(1):63-72.

    JIANG Chuanjin,CHEN Shumin,CHU Lilan,et al. A new understanding about the volcanic distribution characteristics and eruption mechanism of Yingchen Formation in Xujiaweizi fault depression[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2010,26(1):63-72.

    [26] 高斌,穆立华,付兴深,等. 南堡1号构造火成岩与断裂发育模式研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2016,45(5):1003-1009.

    GAO Bin,MU Lihua,FU Xingshen,et al. Evolution pattern of igneous rock and fault in NP1 structure[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2016,45(5):1003-1009.

    [27] 地质部地质辞典办公室. 地质辞典(普通地质构造地质分册)[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1983:171-172.
    [28] 《地球科学大辞典》编委会. 地球科学大辞典基础学科卷[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2006:996-997.
    [29] 唐华风,王璞珺,姜传金,等. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组隐伏火山机构物理模型和地震识别[J]. 地球物理学进展,2007,22(2):530-536.

    TANG Huafeng,WANG Pujun,JIANG Chuanjin,et al. Physical model and seismic recognition of concealed volcanic edifices of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin,Cretaceous,NE China[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2007,22(2):530-536.

    [30] 王璞珺,张功成,蒙启安,等. 地震火山地层学及其在我国火山岩盆地中的应用[J]. 地球物理学报,2011,54(2):597-610.

    WANG Pujun,ZHANG Gongcheng,MENG Qi’an,et al. Applications of seismic volcanostratigraphy to the volcanic rifted basins of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2011,54(2):597-610.

    [31] 王璞珺,庞颜明,唐华风,等. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组古火山机构特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2007,37(6):1064-1073.

    WANG Pujun,PANG Yanming,TANG Huafeng,et al. The characteristics of the paleo-volcanic edifice of Yingcheng formation,Cretaceous,Songliao basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2007,37(6):1064-1073.

    [32]

    JACKSON J A.Glossary of geology.4th ed[M]. Alexandria:American Geological Institute,1997:769.

    [33]

    NAULT J.Volcanoes: Power and magic[M]. Hagen:Kǒnemann Press,2001:155.

    [34] 周心怀,高顺莉,高伟中,等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平北斜坡带海陆过渡型岩性油气藏形成与分布预测[J]. 中国石油勘探,2019,24(2):153-164.

    ZHOU Xinhuai,GAO Shunli,GAO Weizhong,et al. Formation and distribution of marine-continental transitional lithologic reservoirs in Pingbei slope belt,Xihu sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2019,24(2):153-164.

    [35]

    BERNDT C,PLANKE S,ALVESTAD E,et al. Seismic volcanostratigraphy of the Norwegian margin:Constraints on tectonomagmatic break-up processes[J]. Journal of the Geological Society,2001,158(3):413-426.

    [36]

    PLANKE S,SYMONDS P A,ALVESTAD E,et al. Seismic volcanostratigraphy of large-volume basaltic extrusive complexes on rifted margins[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,2000,105(B8):19335-19351.

    [37] 江东辉,蒲仁海,苏思羽,等. 断陷盆地斜坡带大型油气田成藏条件:西湖凹陷平北缓坡断裂与岩性控藏有利区[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(11):33-42.

    JIANG Donghui,PU Renhai,SU Siyu,et al. Conditions for the formation of large oil and gas reservoirs in the slope belts of rift basins:Fault-and lithology-controlled accumulation zones in the pingbei slope of Xihu Sag[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2021,41(11):33-42.

    [38] 宋春刚,曹强,叶加仁,等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷主力烃源岩特征及分布[J]. 石油学报,2016,37(8):962-974.

    SONG Chungang,CAO Qiang,YE Jiaren,et al. Characteristics and distribution of main source rocks in Xihu sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(8):962-974.

    [39] 万延周,陈春峰,陈文侠,等. 西湖凹陷南部始新统烃源岩有机质碳同位素组成特征[J]. 非常规油气,2019,6(5):18-22.

    WAN Yanzhou,CHEN Chunfeng,CHEN Wenxia,et al. Characteristics of Carbon Isotopic Composition of the Eocene hydrocarbon source rocks in southern Xihu Depression[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas,2019,6(5):18-22.

    [40] 胡明毅,沈娇,胡蝶. 西湖凹陷平湖构造带平湖组砂岩储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2013,34(2):185-191.

    HU Mingyi,SHEN Jiao,HU Die. Reservoir characteristics and its main controlling factors of the Pinghu Formation in Pinghu structural belt,Xihu Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(2):185-191.

    [41] 徐国盛,崔恒远,刘勇,等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系花港组砂岩储层致密化与油气充注关系[J]. 地质科技通报,2020,39(3):20-29.

    XU Guosheng,CUI Hengyuan,LIU Yong,et al. Relationship between sandstone reservoirs densification and hydrocarbon charging in the Paleogene Huagang Formation of Xihu Depression,East China Sea Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2020,39(3):20-29.

    [42] 刘峰,黄苏卫,杨鹏程,等. 西湖凹陷Y构造花港组气藏特征及成藏主控因素[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2021,41(6):174-182.

    LIU Feng,HUANG Suwei,YANG Pengcheng,et al. Characteristics of gas reservoir and controlling factors for gas accumulation in the Huagang Formation in Y Structure,Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2021,41(6):174-182.

    [43] 郝芳,孙永传,李思田,等. 活动热流体对有机质热演化和油气生成作用的强化[J]. 地球科学,1996,21(1):71-75.

    HAO Fang,SUN Yongchuan,LI Sitian,et al. Enhancement of organic maturation and petroleum generation by hydrothermal fluids[J]. Earth Science,1996,21(1):71-75.

    [44] 叶加仁,杨香华. 沉积盆地热流体活动及其成藏动力学意义[J]. 沉积学报,2001,19(2):214-218.

    YE Jiaren,YANG Xianghua. Thermal fluid flow in sedimentary basins and its significance to pool-forming dynamics[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2001,19(2):214-218.

    [45] 张小莉,冯乔,查明,等. 惠民凹陷岩浆作用对碎屑岩储层的影响[J]. 地质学报,2008,82(5):655-662.

    ZHANG Xiaoli,FENG Qiao,ZHA Ming,et al. The influence of volcanism on clastic reservoirs in Huimin depression[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,2008,82(5):655-662.

    [46] 郭涛,杨波,陈磊,等. 岩浆岩三维精细刻画:黄河口凹陷南斜坡渤中34-9油田的发现[J]. 中国海上油气,2016,28(2):71-77.

    GUO Tao,YANG Bo,CHEN Lei,et al. 3D fine description of magmatic rocks:The discovery of BZ34-9 oilfield in the southern slope of Huanghekou Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2016,28(2):71-77.

计量
  • 文章访问数:  16
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  2
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-05-15
  • 修回日期:  2024-12-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回