煤矿水文地质勘探中水文地球化学判别标准的构建

杨建, 刘洋, 方刚

杨建, 刘洋, 方刚. 煤矿水文地质勘探中水文地球化学判别标准的构建[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2018, 46(1): 92-96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.016
引用本文: 杨建, 刘洋, 方刚. 煤矿水文地质勘探中水文地球化学判别标准的构建[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2018, 46(1): 92-96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.016
YANG Jian, LIU Yang, FANG Gang. Construction of hydrogeochemistry criteria in hydrogeological exploration in coal mines[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(1): 92-96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.016
Citation: YANG Jian, LIU Yang, FANG Gang. Construction of hydrogeochemistry criteria in hydrogeological exploration in coal mines[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2018, 46(1): 92-96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2018.01.016

 

煤矿水文地质勘探中水文地球化学判别标准的构建

基金项目: 

国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0501104);国家自然科学基金项目(41302214);中煤科工集团西安研究院有限公司创新基金项目(2015XAYMS18)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨建,1979年生,男,江苏盐城人,博士,副研究员,从事煤矿水文地质研究.E-mail:yangjian@cctegxian.com

  • 中图分类号: TD741;P641.3

Construction of hydrogeochemistry criteria in hydrogeological exploration in coal mines

Funds: 

The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0501104)

  • 摘要: 针对煤矿水文地质勘探过程中存在的水文地球化学异常问题,以蒙陕矿区侏罗系含水层为研究对象,开展了水化学异常原因分析和判别标准构建,结果表明:勘探过程中以"水清沙净"为判别洗井完成的依据不充分,水泥浆残留是造成pH升高、矿化度降低等水化学异常的主要因素,因此结合蒙陕矿区深埋型煤田水文补堪和工作面探放水等工作成果,建立了由pH、矿化度(TDS)、HCO3-、SO42-等水质指标组成的"五要素"判别标准,对巴拉素井田水文补堪过程中采集的36组水样进行判别,可以迅速判断出存在水化学异常的8组水样。剔除水化学特征异常的水样点后,可以很清晰地建立巴拉素井田各含水层的水化学特征,第四系水化学特征与地表水比较接近,表现为低矿化度、弱碱性、重碳酸钙型水;白垩系洛河组含水层与第四系水力联系密切,但埋深有所增加,导致一定量Na+离子溶入,水化学特征演化为重碳酸钙钠型;安定组为区域性较稳定隔水层,导致直罗组和延安组含水层以侧向补给为主,地下水循环交替时间较长,形成了深部滞留特征的高矿化度(>2 500 mg/L)硫酸钠型地下水。
    Abstract: Aiming at the problem of hydrogeochemical anomalies existing in hydrogeological exploration in coal mines, Jurassic aquifer in Inner Mongalia-Shaanxi mining area was taken as research objective, analysis and construction of criteria of causes of hydrochemical anomalies were carried out. The results showed:it was insufficient that during exploration "clean water and sand" was taken as the basis for discriminating completion of well washing, the residue of cement slurry was the major factor for hydrochemical anomalies such as increase of pH and decrease of mineralization. Therefore, the results of complementary hydrological exploration and water detection and drainage in working faces in deeply buried coalfield in Inner Mongolia-Shaanxi mining area were combined, the criteria of "five factors" constituted of pH, mineralization (TDS), HCO3-, SO42- were set up, 36 sets of water samples collected during hydrological exploration in Balasu Mine were discriminated, 8 sets of hydrochemically abnormal water samples were rapidly judged out. After rejection of hydrochemically abnormal water sample points, the hydrochemical characteristics of different aquifers in Balasu Mine might be set up clearly. Quaternary hydrochemical characteristics were close to surface water, presented as water type of low mineralization, weak alkaline and heavy calcium carbonate. The aquifer of Jurassic Luohe Formation was closely connected hydraulically with Quaternary but deeper to some extent, resulting in dissolution of certain amount of Na+, the chemical characteristics evolved into heavy calcium carbonate type. Anding Formation is a relatively stable regional aquifuge, inducing that lateral recharge is dominant in Zhiluo Formation and Yan'an Formation, the time of cyclic alternation of groundwater is long, forming groundwater of high mineralization(>2 500 mg/L) and sodium sulfate type characterized by deep retention. sodium sulfate type groundwater.
  • [1] 武强,李博,刘守强,等. 基于分区变权模型的煤层底板突水脆弱性评价——以开滦蔚州典型矿区为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013,38(9):1516-1521.

    WU Qiang,LI Bo,LIU Shouqiang,et al. Vulnerability assessment of coal floor groundwater bursting based on zoning variable weight model:A case study in the typical mining region of Kailuan[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2013,38(9):1516-1521.

    [2] 王飞. 下组煤层底板奥灰突水脆弱性评价分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2014,42(4):97-100.

    WANG Fei. Evaluation analysis on floor water inrush vulnerability of Ordovician limestone in down group Seams[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2014,42(4):97-100.

    [3] 奚砚涛,冯春莉,郭英海,等. 钻孔单位涌水量换算的理论与实践[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2015,43(1):48-51.

    XI Yantao,FENG Chunli,GUO Yinghai,et al. The theory and practice of conversion about specific capacity[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2015,43(1):48-51.

    [4] 杨建,梁向阳,丁湘. 蒙陕接壤区深埋煤层开发过程中矿井涌水量变化特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2017,45(4):97-101.

    YANG Jian, LIANG Xiangyang, DING Xiang. Variation characteristics of mine inflow during mining of deep buried coal seams in Shaanxi and Inner Mongolia contiguous area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2017,45(4):97-101.

    [5] 韩德品,郭林生,赵利利,等. 瞬变电磁法快速探查煤矿突水构造关键技术及应用效果[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2014,42(6):97-100.

    HAN Depin,GUO Linsheng,ZHAO lili,et al. The key technology and application effects of transient electromagnetic method for rapid delecting water inrush structure in coal mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2014,42(6):97-100.

    [6] 张,陈锁忠,都娥娥秝湲. 基于同位素与水化学分析法的地下水补径排研究——以苏锡常地区浅层地下水为例[J]. 南京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,31(2):76-81.

    ZHANG Liyuan,CHEN Suozhong,DU Ee. Study on replenishment run off and discharge of the shallow groundwater based on the isotope and hydrochemistry analysis methods:For example the shallow groundwater in Su-Xi-Chang area[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal Unversity(Natural Science Edition),2011, 31(2):76-81.

    [7] 王疆霞,李云峰,徐斌,等. 基于GIS的鄂尔多斯盆地地下水水化学场研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2009,36(1):30-34.

    WANG Jiangxia,LI Yunfeng,XU Bin,et al. Research on groundwater hydrochemical field in the Ordos basin based on GIS[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology,2009,36(1):30-34.

    [8] 杨建,王新,李凯. 煤矿区地下水中溶解性有机质荧光特征Ⅰ——含水层之间垂向差异[J]. 安全与环境学报,2015,15(5):44-48.

    YANG Jian,WANG Xin,LI Kai. Fluorescence feature of the dissolved organic matters in the groundwater of mining area:The vertical difference of the aquifers[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2015,15(5):44-48.

    [9] 杨建. 呼吉尔特矿区葫芦素煤矿水文地球化学特征研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2016,47(12):203-206.

    YANG Jian. Research on hydrogeochemical characteristics in Hulusu coal mine of hujierte coal field[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2016,47(12):203-206.

    [10] 周健,史秀志,王怀勇. 矿井突水水源识别的距离判别分析模型[J]. 煤炭学报,2010,35(2):278-282.

    ZHOU Jian,SHI Xiuzhi,WANG Huaiyong. Water-bursting source determination of mine based on distance discriminant analysis model[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(2):278-282.

    [11] 张乐中,曹海东. 利用水化学特征识别桑树坪煤矿突水水源[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2013,41(4):42-45.

    ZHANG Lezhong,CAO Haidong. Distinguishing the sources of water inrush in Sangshuping coal mine byhydrochemical characteristics[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2013,41(4):42-45.

  • 期刊类型引用(15)

    1. 王皓,董书宁,尚宏波,王甜甜,杨建,赵春虎,张全,周振方,刘基,侯悦. 国内外矿井水处理及资源化利用研究进展. 煤田地质与勘探. 2023(01): 222-236 . 本站查看
    2. 陈陆望,胡永胜,张杰,张苗,郑剑,郑忻,张媛媛,蔡欣悦,武明辉. 华北型煤田水文地球化学勘探关键技术研究进展. 煤田地质与勘探. 2023(02): 207-219 . 本站查看
    3. 郑伟生,李伟峰. 地下水对工程建筑不良影响的反常现象原因及治理分析. 山东煤炭科技. 2023(04): 177-180 . 百度学术
    4. 郭立霞. 晋城市坪上煤矿水文地质特征及水害预测防治技术. 能源与环保. 2023(09): 134-139+148 . 百度学术
    5. 方刚. 榆横北区富水煤层与上覆含水层的水力联系. 科学技术与工程. 2023(29): 12465-12473 . 百度学术
    6. 贾海. 区域水环境水文特性勘测技术研究. 水利技术监督. 2022(01): 129-132+168+176 . 百度学术
    7. 康占忠,刘洋. 榆神矿区水文地球化学特征精细分层研究. 煤炭技术. 2022(08): 72-75 . 百度学术
    8. 于洋. 三维地震勘探技术在煤矿构造勘探的应用. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2022(21): 163-165 . 百度学术
    9. 梁向阳,方刚,黄浩. 榆神矿区曹家滩井田水文地球化学特征研究. 干旱区资源与环境. 2020(05): 102-108 . 百度学术
    10. 杨聘卿. 孔家沟煤矿水文地球化学特征及水源识别研究. 能源与环保. 2020(07): 120-125 . 百度学术
    11. 纪卓辰,丁湘,侯恩科,蒲治国,谢朋. 纳林河二号煤矿涌水水源判别的PCA-Logistic方法. 煤田地质与勘探. 2020(05): 97-105+112 . 本站查看
    12. 徐慧,牟义,李江华,姜鹏,黎灵. 河流区域露-井联采矿区水文地质综合勘查技术研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2020(11): 191-198 . 百度学术
    13. 白晶,方刚. 榆横南区魏墙煤矿工作面回采防治水安全评价. 工程技术研究. 2019(11): 238-239 . 百度学术
    14. 李永涛,杨建. 基于顶板水预疏放的首采工作面涌水规律. 煤田地质与勘探. 2019(04): 104-109 . 本站查看
    15. 任鹏飞. 转角勘查区水文地质特征分析. 陕西煤炭. 2019(06): 125-130 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  193
  • HTML全文浏览量:  16
  • PDF下载量:  20
  • 被引次数: 17
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-10-04
  • 发布日期:  2018-02-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回