中低温对流型地热系统地热水循环深度评价方法与应用

Methods for geothermal water circulation depth calculation in low-medium temperature convective geothermal systems and its application

  • 摘要:
    背景 地热水循环深度是地热系统或地热田研究的重要参数之一,其决定了地热水携带的热能强度与矿物成分,是影响地热资源开发利用效率与可持续性的核心要素。
    进展 从“源(热源,流体源)、通道、储层、盖层”及“升流过程及其影响”5个方面总结了典型中低温对流型地热系统的特征,系统梳理适用的循环深度评价方法及其基本原理、适用条件和参数获取方式等。(1)目前主要的评价方法包括地热增温法和数值模拟法两大类。前者要求有代表性的地温梯度值,更适用于传导型或以传导型为主的地热系统。后者是基于对流型地热系统上升热水与围岩之间热交换的质量和能量平衡原理建立的,根据升流通道几何形状的2个端元模型又分为管道模型和断层面模型,二者都要求地热水升流过程的热损失方式主要为与围岩的热交换。(2)地球物理探测和解译法可以给出储层和断裂的空间分布,但受限于精度和分辨率,多给出定性或半定量结果;考虑到其实施成本高,建议将其与钻孔数据的联合约束作为辅助性支撑。(3)综合以上分析,提出一套科学、合理的循环深度评价流程,首先建立地热系统概念模式图并根据热水出露方式判断其属于管道模型还是断层面模型,其次选择2~3种适用的地温计方法计算可靠的热储温度,最后结合岩石热导率、当地年均气温等参数,计算地热水循环深度。(4)已有研究表明,广东丰顺邓屋地热系统是我国东南沿海典型的中低温对流型地热系统,受NE和NW向断裂控制,地热水出露方式表现为管道模型特征,其热储温度为143 ℃,计算得到地热水循环深度为6.0~7.0 km,该深度范围与MT探测解译的储层深度一致。
    展望 未来应着眼于地球物理、地球化学和数值方法相结合,获取地热水循环深度的可靠值,实现对流热对热通量贡献的定量评价,为地热资源可持续开发利用方案制定提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract:
    background The circulation depth of geothermal water is one of the critical parameters in the study of geothermal systems as it determines the intensity of thermal energy and mineral compositions of geothermal water and influences the efficiency and sustainability of geothermal resource development and utilization.
    Progress For low-medium temperature convective geothermal resources that being largely and widely utilized, methods for circulation depth evaluation and corresponding principles, applicable conditions and parameter acquisition approaches are systematically summarized. This paper summarizes the characteristics of typical low-to-moderate temperature convective geothermal systems from five aspects including "sources (heat source, fluid source), conduits, reservoirs, cap rocks" and "upwelling processes and their impacts". (1) Applicable methods for evaluating circulation depth, along with their fundamental principles, applicable conditions, and parameter acquisition approaches are systematically reviewed. Geothermal gradient method and numerical simulation method are proposed. The former requires representative geothermal gradient values and is more suitable for conductive or predominantly conductive geothermal systems. The latter is established based on the principles of mass and energy balance in heat exchange between the ascending hot water and surrounding rocks in convective geothermal systems. Depending on the two end-member models of the geometric shape of the upwelling conduits, it can be further divided into the conduit model and the fault-plane model, both of which assume that heat loss during the ascent of geothermal water primarily occurs through heat exchange with surrounding rocks. (2) Geophysical exploration and interpretation methods can provide spatial distributions of reservoirs and fracture networks, but due to limitations in accuracy and resolution, they often yield qualitative or semi-quantitative results. Given their high implementation costs, it is recommended that these methods be used in conjunction with borehole data for auxiliary support. (3) Based on the above analysis, this paper proposes a scientific and reasonable evaluation process for circulation depth. First, a conceptual model of the geothermal system should be established to check it is classified as either a conduit model or a fault-plane model based on the manner of hot water discharge. Next, two to three applicable geothermometer methods should be selected to calculate reliable reservoir temperatures. (4) Finally, the circulation depth is determined by combining parameters such as rock thermal conductivity and local annual average air temperature. Previous studies have shown that the Dengwu geothermal system in Fengshun, Guangdong Province, is a typical low-to-moderate temperature convective geothermal system along the southeast coast of China. Controlling by NE- and NW-trending faults, it exhibits characteristics of the conduit model. With a reservoir temperature of 143 ℃, the calculated circulation depth ranges from 6.0 to 7.0 km, which is consistent with the reservoir depth interpreted from MT exploration.
    Perspectives Future efforts should focus on integrating geophysical, geochemical, and numerical methods to obtain reliable information on geothermal water circulation, and achieving quantitative evaluation of the contribution of convective heat to heat flux, thereby providing a scientific basis for formulating sustainable development and utilization plans for geothermal resources.

     

/

返回文章
返回