基于贝叶斯优化的CNN-BiLSTM-Attention的煤体结构识别方法

Coal body structure identification method based on Bayesian-optimized CNN-BiLSTM-Attention

  • 摘要:
    背景 含煤盆地在多期构造变形作用下形成原生煤与构造煤,孔裂隙发育情况、渗透性与力学性能的不同导致煤层含气性差异大,煤体结构评价对煤层气的勘探开发至关重要。
    目的和方法 为提高煤体结构识别的准确性与智能化水平,构建了一种融合贝叶斯优化策略的CNN-BiLSTM-Attention混合模型。该方法结合卷积神经网络(convolutional neural network,CNN)的局部特征提取、双向长短期记忆网络(bidirection long short-term memory,BiLSTM)的时序建模和注意力机制(Attention)的特征聚焦能力,实现了多尺度测井数据的高效融合与表征。同时,采用贝叶斯优化自动调参,增强模型稳定性与训练效率。以鄂尔多斯盆地山西组与本溪组煤层为研究对象,基于常规测井数据,经过标准化处理、异常值剔除及缺失值插补,结合岩心资料构建了原生煤、原生−碎裂煤及碎裂煤的数据集,并采用交叉熵损失函数对模型进行训练与评估。
    结果和结论 CNN-BiLSTM-Attention混合模型的准确率为95.12%,优于单一模型BiLSTM和CNN,各类煤体结构的精确率与召回率均超过93%,混淆矩阵显示误差分布均匀。在X2井中应用,混合模型在不同煤体结构过渡段表现出更高的一致性与判别力,显著减少了原生–碎裂煤与碎裂煤的错判。模型对测井数据的噪声具有良好鲁棒性,为煤层气精细评价提供了稳定可靠的技术支撑。

     

    Abstract:
    Background Coal-bearing basins contain primary and tectonically deformed coals due to multistage tectonic deformations. However, the gas-bearing properties of coal seams differ significantly due to varying pore and fracture densities, permeability, and mechanical properties. This makes coal structure assessment critical to coalbed methane (CBM) exploration and production.
    Objective and Method  To enhance the accuracy and intelligence of coal structure identification, this study constructed a CNN-BiLSTM-Attention hybrid model that integrated a Bayesian optimization strategy. This model allowed for efficient fusion and representation of multi-scale log data by combining the local feature extraction capability of the convolutional neural network (CNN), the temporal sequence modeling strength of the bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and the feature focusing ability of the Attention mechanism. Moreover, this model showed elevated stability and high training efficiency thanks to automatic parameter tuning through Bayesian optimization. Focusing on coal seams in the Shanxi and Benxi formations within the Ordos Basin, this study constructed a dataset of primary, primary-cataclastic, and cataclastic coals based on conventional log data, subjected to normalization, outlier removal, and interpolation of missing values, as well as data from cores. Then, the hybrid model was trained and assessed using the cross-entropy loss function.
    Results and Conclusions  The CNN-BiLSTM-Attention hybrid model yielded an accuracy of 95.12%, outperforming isolated BiLSTM and CNN models. This hybrid model yielded precision and recall rates above 93% for various coal structures. Furthermore, it yielded a uniform error distribution, as indicated by the confusion matrices. This model was applied to well X2, demonstrating high consistency and discriminative ability for transition zones between varying coal structures. This significantly reduces misclassification between primary-cataclastic and cataclastic coals. Additionally, the hybrid model exhibits strong robust performance in processing noise in log data. This study offers a reliable and effective approach for fine-scale CBM assessment.

     

/

返回文章
返回