煤系氦气扩散机制及其对氦气富集的启示以沁水盆地北部太原组为例

Diffusion mechanisms of coal-measure helium and their implications for helium accumulation: A case study of the Taiyuan Formation, northern Qinshui Basin, China

  • 摘要:
    目的 全球富氦气藏以常规天然气为主,近年来在我国鄂尔多斯盆地及周缘石炭−二叠系煤系中发现含氦天然气,揭示煤系氦气具有一定的资源潜力。但目前针对煤系氦气扩散运移机制的研究几乎处于空白,严重制约煤系氦气富集规律的进一步研究。
    方法 以沁水盆地北部太原组煤及其顶板泥岩为研究对象,开展不同含水饱和度及气体含量(体积分数)煤系氦气物理扩散实验,并结合区域沉积埋藏史及生烃演化史模拟计算煤与泥岩中氦气扩散通量,揭示煤系氦气富集机制。
    结果和结论 (1) 实验温压条件下(20 ℃,气体压力为1 MPa),在≤13.5 nm孔隙中氦气以Knudsen扩散为主,煤与泥岩中氦气的扩散速率相近;在>13.5 nm孔隙中氦气转为Fick扩散。煤系氦气扩散主要受孔隙结构、含水性和气体含量影响,孔隙连通性越差、含水饱和度越高、氦气含量越低,氦气扩散越慢,封闭能力越强。(2) 煤中割理−裂缝系统发育,连通性较好,导致煤中氦气扩散系数(1.1×10−8 m2/s)高于泥岩(5.8×10−9 m2/s)。高含水性通过阻塞孔隙通道和改变气−液界面行为降低氦气扩散速率,而气体含量对扩散速率的影响主要与气体分压和氦气与甲烷物理性质差异有关。(3) 结合物理模拟和数值模拟结果,建立了地质历史时期氦气扩散通量预测模型,标准状态下煤和泥岩中的氦气扩散通量分别为13.24、5.05 cm3/m2,氦气扩散主要发生在含量较高的烃类生成初期,后期逸散量可忽略不计。(4) 煤系生氦能力较弱,煤系氦气的富集成藏是外源补给与保存动态平衡的结果,深部断裂促进深部氦气向上运移,而低含量梯度、高含水饱和度及低连通性通过抑制扩散速率而增强氦气的封存能力。煤系氦气勘探需重点关注深部断裂系统沟通能力及盖层封存有效性。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The global helium-rich gas reservoirs are dominated by conventional natural gas reservoirs. In recent years, helium-bearing natural gas has been discovered in the Carboniferous-Permian coal measures in the Ordos Basin and surrounding regions, revealing the resource potential of coal-measure helium. However, there is almost a total lack of studies on mechanisms underlying the diffusion and migration of coal-measure helium. This severely restricts further research on the accumulation patterns of coal-measure helium.
    Methods This study investigated a coal seam in the Taiyuan Formation in the northern Qinshui Basin and mudstones in the coal seam roof. Using physical diffusion experiments on coal-measure helium under different water saturations and gas concentrations, as well as the simulation of the regional sedimentary, burial, and hydrocarbon generation histories, this study calculated the helium diffusion fluxes in the coals and mudstones. Accordingly, the mechanisms behind the enrichment of coal-measure helium gas were determined.
    Results and Conclusions Under experimental temperature (20 ℃) and pressure (1 MPa), helium diffusion was dominated by Knudsen diffusion in pores with sizes less than or equal to 13.5 nm, with similar diffusion rates observed in the coals and mudstones. In contrast, helium diffusion shifted to Fick diffusion in pores with sizes greater than 13.5 nm. The diffusion of coal-measure helium gas was primarily affected by pore structure, water content, and gas concentration. Poorer pore connectivity, higher water saturation, and a lower helium concentration corresponded to slower helium diffusion and a higher sealing capacity. The coals exhibited a developed cleavage-fracture system, which contributed to high connectivity. As a result, the coals had a higher helium diffusion coefficient (1.1 × 10−8 m2/s) than the mudstones (5.8 × 10−9 m2/s). High water content reduced the helium diffusion rate by blocking pore pathways and changing the behavior of the gas-liquid interface. The influence of the gas concentration on the helium diffusion rate was principally related to both the partial pressures of gases and differences in physical properties between helium and methane. In combination with the physical and numerical simulation results, this study established a prediction model for the helium diffusion flux throughout geological history. The prediction results indicate that the helium diffusion fluxes in the coals and mudstones were 13.24 cm3/m2 and 5.05 cm3/m2, respectively under standard temperature and pressure conditions. Furthermore, the helium diffusion occurred predominantly in the early hydrocarbon generation stage with high gas concentrations, while the amount of helium escaping in the later stage can be ignored. Given the relatively weak helium generation capacity of the coal measures, the enrichment and accumulation of coal-measure helium resulted from the dynamic balance between exogenetic recharge and preservation. Deep faults facilitate the upward migration of deep helium. Meanwhile, the low gas concentration gradient, high water saturation, and low connectivity enhance the helium storage capacity by suppressing diffusion. Therefore, it is necessary to highlight the connectivity of deep fault systems and the sealing performance of cap rocks in the exploration of coal-measure helium.

     

/

返回文章
返回