管道穿越对煤系土河床冲刷深度的影响

王心龙; 孙平贺; 赵明哲; 王靖源; 邢世宽

doi:10.12363/issn.1001-1986.21.10.0581

管道穿越对煤系土河床冲刷深度的影响

王心龙^{1, 2,},
孙平贺^{1, 2, ,},
赵明哲³,
王靖源⁴,
邢世宽^{1, 2}

1.
中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院，湖南长沙 410083
2.
有色金属成矿预测与地质环境监测教育部重点实验室，湖南长沙 410083
3.
中交第三公路工程局有限公司，北京 100000
4.
广西交通设计集团有限公司，广西南宁 530000

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划课题(2020YFC1807203)；中南大学研究生自主探索创新项目(2020zzts665)；中交三公局基础工程废弃泥浆固化处理技术研究项目(3GS-TL-QT-10-2020)

详细信息

作者简介:
王心龙，1996年生，男，安徽滁州人，硕士研究生，研究方向为非开挖及钻井液技术研究. E-mail：pupilwxl@csu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
孙平贺，1982年生，男，吉林松原人，博士，教授，从事非开挖、矿产地质及非常规能源钻进技术的教学与科研工作. E-mail：pinghesun@csu.edu.cn

中图分类号: TV141
计量
- 文章访问数: 137
- HTML全文浏览量: 11
- PDF下载量: 10
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-21
- 修回日期: 2021-12-24
- 网络出版日期: 2022-06-14
- 发布日期: 2022-06-24

Influence of pipeline crossing on riverbed scouring depth of coal measure soil

WANG Xinlong^{1, 2,},
SUN Pinghe^{1, 2, ,},
ZHAO Mingzhe³,
WANG Jingyuan⁴,
XING Shikuan^{1, 2}

1.
School of Geosciences and Info-physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Ministry of Education, Changsha 410083, China
3.
CCCC Third Highway Engineering Co. Ltd., Beijing 100000, China
4.
Guangxi Communications Design Group Co. Ltd., Nanning 530000, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究管道穿越煤系土河床后对冲刷深度的影响，基于室内构建的煤系黏土质和砂质河床模型试验装置，设置不同管道埋深、管径大小和冲刷流速进行冲刷模拟试验，并利用SPSS 25.0软件对河床冲刷深度与以上3个因素进行多元线性回归分析。结果表明：管道埋深、管径大小和冲刷流速3个因素能够解释冲刷深度71.4%~80.6%的变化，管道埋深显著负向影响冲刷深度，管径大小和冲刷流速显著正向影响冲刷深度。管道穿越会破坏河床颗粒间的原始胶结状态，强化水流的冲刷作用。利用所得线性回归方程对珠海市某管道穿越工程进行安全性验证，考虑了管道埋深与管径大小对冲刷深度的影响，验证结果证明了回归方程的可行性。研究成果为管道穿越工程设计提供一定参考。
- 管道穿越 /
- 煤系土 /
- 黏土质河床 /
- 砂质河床 /
- 冲刷深度 /
- 多元线性回归
Abstract: For the purpose of studying the influence of pipeline crossing on the riverbed scouring depth of the coal measure soil, different pipeline depths, pipe diameters and scouring velocity were set up to carry out scour simulation tests based on the clay and sandy riverbed model test equipment. The SPSS software was used to perform multiple linear regression analysis on the riverbed scouring depth and the above factors. The results show that the pipeline depth, pipe diameter and scouring velocity are responsible for 71.4% to 80.6% of the change of scour depth. The burial depth significantly and negatively affects the scouring depth; the pipe diameter and scouring velocity significantly and positively affect the scouring depth. Pipeline crossing will destroy the original cement state between the particles of the riverbed and strengthen the scouring effect of the water flow. With the influence of buried depth and pipe diameter on the scour depth being considered, the obtained linear regression equation was used to verify the safety of a pipeline crossing project in Zhuhai City, where the verification results have shown the feasibility of the regression equation. The research results can provide a certain reference for pipeline crossing engineering design.
- pipeline crossing /
- coal measure soil /
- clay riverbed /
- sandy riverbed /
- scouring depth /
- multiple linear regression

HTML全文

图 1 室内试验模型

Fig. 1 Indoor test model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 室内试验流程

Fig. 2 Indoor test process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 黏土质河床模型标准化残差正态概率

Fig. 3 Normal probability diagram of standardized residual error of the clay riverbed model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 砂质河床模型标准化残差正态概率

Fig. 4 Normal probability diagram of standardized residual error of the sandy riverbed model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 管道穿越后河床层

Fig. 5 Schematic diagram of riverbed strata after pipeline crossing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 河床模型物性参数

Table 1 Physical parameters of the riverbed model

颗粒种类	重度$ \gamma $/(kN·m⁻³)	$ {D}_{50} $/mm	压缩前孔隙率/%	含水率/%	压缩后孔隙率/%	黏聚力/kPa	摩擦角/(°)	河床坡降J
黏土质	20.3	0.58	45.3	23.71	37.6	6.24	37.9	0.013
砂质	23.7	0.30	48.7	21.36	42.0	—	35.0	0.013

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 河床模型试验参数

Table 2 Model test parameters of clay riverbed

黏土质河床			砂土质河床
管道直径/cm	水流流速ν/ (cm·s⁻¹)	管道埋深h/cm	管道直径/cm	水流流速ν/ (cm·s⁻¹)	管道埋深h/cm
5.0	15	10	5.0	10	10
5.0	15	15	5.0	10	15
5.0	15	20	5.0	10	20
5.0	15	25	5.0	10	25
5.0	20	10	5.0	15	10
5.0	20	15	5.0	15	15
5.0	20	20	5.0	15	20
5.0	20	25	5.0	15	25
7.5	15	10	7.5	10	10
7.5	15	15	7.5	10	15
7.5	15	20	7.5	10	20
7.5	15	25	7.5	10	25
7.5	20	10	7.5	15	10
7.5	20	15	7.5	15	15
7.5	20	20	7.5	15	20
7.5	20	25	7.5	15	25
11.0	15	10	11.0	10	10
11.0	15	15	11.0	10	15
11.0	15	20	11.0	10	20
11.0	15	25	11.0	10	25
11.0	20	10	11.0	15	10
11.0	20	15	11.0	15	15
11.0	20	20	11.0	15	20
11.0	20	25	11.0	15	25

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 黏土质河床模型线性回归分析结果

Table 3 Linear regression analysis results of the clay riverbed model

R	R²	调整后 R²	标准估计误差	DW
0.867^a	0.752	0.714	0.35605	2.739

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 黏土质河床模型系数

Table 4 Model coefficients of the clay riverbed

因素	B	t	显著性系数	容差	VIF
常量	2.868	4.719	0	—	—
管径	0.084	2.844	0.01	1.000	1.000
埋深	−0.088	−6.787	0	1.000	1.000
流速	0.074	2.528	0.02	1.000	1.000

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 砂质河床模型线性回归分析结果

Table 5 Linear regression analysis results of the sandy riverbed model

R	R²	调整后 R²	标准估计误差	DW
0.912^a	0.831	0.806	0.23242	2.355

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 砂质河床模型系数

Table 6 Coefficients of the sandy riverbed model

因素	B	t	显著性系数	容差	VIF
常量	2.808	8.733	0	—	—
管径	0.093	3.781	0.001	1.000	1.000
埋深	−0.089	−8.606	0	1.000	1.000
流速	0.061	3.206	0.004	1.000	1.000

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 不同地层管道穿越河流的可行性评价

Table 7 Feasibility evaluation of pipeline crossing river in different strata

地层条件	适用	有一定难度	不适用
淤泥、软黏土和有机堆积物		√
中硬−硬质黏土和淤泥	√
硬黏土和强风化泥页岩	√
非常松散−松散的砂层(砾石质量分数<30%)		√
中−致密的砂层(砾石质量分数<30%)	√
松散−密实的砾石砂层(30%<砾石质量分数<50%)		√
松散−密实的砾石砂层(50%<砾石质量分数<85%)			√
松散−密实的卵砾石层			√
含有大量孤石、漂石等其他障碍物地层			√
风化岩层或强胶结地层	√
弱风化或未风化地层		√

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	贾建称,巩泽文,靳德武,等. 煤炭地质学“十三五”主要进展及展望[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(1):32−44. JIA Jiancheng,GONG Zewen,JIN Dewu,et al. The main progress in the 13^th five–year plan and the prospect of coal geology[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(1):32−44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.004 JIA Jiancheng, GONG Zewen, JIN Dewu, et al. The main progress in the 13^th five–year plan and the prospect of coal geology[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2021, 49(1): 32–44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.01.004
[2]	WISNIOWSKI R,LOPATA P,ORLOWICZ G. Numerical methods for optimization of the horizontal directional drilling (HDD) well path trajectory[J]. Energies,2020,13(15):3806. DOI: 10.3390/en13153806
[3]	SALLEH M N M,HARON N A,SHAFRI H Z M,et al. The important of horizontal directional drilling standard technical requirements[J]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2019,357(1):012029. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/357/1/012029
[4]	马赞,陈冬冬,解恒星,等. 负角度定向长钻孔瓦斯抽采完孔工艺研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(3):62−68. MA Zan,CHEN Dongdong,XIE Hengxing,et al. Gas drainage borehole completion technology of directional long hole drilling with negative angle[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2021,49(3):62−68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.03.008 MA Zan, CHEN Dongdong, XIE Hengxing, et al. Gas drainage borehole completion technology of directional long hole drilling with negative angle[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2021, 49(3): 62–68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2021.03.008
[5]	KAMEL M A, EISHAFEI M, SAIF A W A, et al. Automatic trenchless horizontal directional drilling using quad motors drilling heads[C]. 2018 15th International Multi–Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD). 2018.
[6]	FAGHIH, ASHKAN, YAOLIN, et al. Fluidic drag estimation in horizontal directional drilling based on flow equations[J]. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering & Practice, 2015.
[7]	张榜,丰浩然,习明星,等. 基于离散元法的煤系土剪切带演化宏细观分析[J]. 公路交通科技,2020,37(12):40−46. ZHANG Bang,FENG Haoran,XI Mingxing,et al. Macro–meso analysis on coal measure soil shear band evolution based on discrete element method[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2020,37(12):40−46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2020.12.006 ZHANG Bang, FENG Haoran, XI Mingxing, et al. Macro–meso analysis on coal measure soil shear band evolution based on discrete element method[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2020, 37(12): 40–46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2020.12.006
[8]	俞乐群. 关于采用桥渡一般冲刷计算公式确定穿河管道埋深的探讨[J]. 油气管道技术,1981(1):8−12. YU Lequn. Discussion on using the general scour calculation formula of bridge crossing to determine the buried depth of river–crossing pipelines[J]. Oil and Gas Pipeline Technology,1981(1):8−12. YU Lequn. Discussion on using the general scour calculation formula of bridge crossing to determine the buried depth of river–crossing pipelines[J]. Oil and Gas Pipeline Technology, 1981(1): 8–12.
[9]	俞乐群. 管道穿越河流设计[J]. 油气储运,1983(1):34−40. YU Lequn. Pipeline crossing river design[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,1983(1):34−40. YU Lequn. Pipeline crossing river design[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 1983(1): 34–40.
[10]	黄金池,孟国忠. 管道穿河工程水毁灾害分析[J]. 泥沙研究,1998(2):42−49. HUANG Jinchi,MENG Guozhong. Analysis on flood damage of crossing river pipeline project[J]. Journal of Sediment Research,1998(2):42−49. HUANG Jinchi, MENG Guozhong. Analysis on flood damage of crossing river pipeline project[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 1998(2): 42–49.
[11]	白路遥,李亮亮,马云宾,等. 穿河管道河床冲刷的改进计算模型及应用[J]. 人民黄河,2015,37(4):55−57. BAI Luyao,LI Liangliang,MA Yunbin,et al. Improvement of calculation model and its application in river bed scour of river–crossing pipeline[J]. Yellow River,2015,37(4):55−57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.04.013 BAI Luyao, LI Liangliang, MA Yunbin, et al. Improvement of calculation model and its application in river bed scour of river–crossing pipeline[J]. Yellow River, 2015, 37(4): 55–57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2015.04.013
[12]	唐万金,王吉祥,杨鸣. 某穿越长江输油管道工程中河床冲刷深度计算[J]. 人民长江,2013,44(6):59−61. TANG Wanjin,WANG Jixiang,YANG Ming. Calculation of scoring depth for oil pipeline crossing Yangtze river[J]. Yangtze River,2013,44(6):59−61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2013.06.020 TANG Wanjin, WANG Jixiang, YANG Ming. Calculation of scoring depth for oil pipeline crossing Yangtze river[J]. Yangtze River, 2013, 44(6): 59–61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4179.2013.06.020
[13]	CAO Yonggang,BAI Yuchuan,WANG Junqin,et al. Prediction of scour depth around offshore pipelines in the south China sea[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Application,2015,14(1):83−92. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-015-1290-1
[14]	NAJAFZADEH M,BARANI G A,AZAMATHULLA H M. Prediction of pipeline scour depth in clear−water and live−bed conditions using group method of data handling[J]. Neural Computing and Applications,2014,24(3):629−635.
[15]	杨元平,陈刚,陈韬霄,等. 管道穿越富春江分层河床最大冲刷深度试验研究[J]. 水电能源科学,2020,38(12):114−117. YANG Yuanping,CHEN Gang,CHEN Taoxiao,et al. Experimental study on the maximum scouring depth of layered riverbed at pipeline crossing Fuchunjiang river section[J]. Water Resources and Power,2020,38(12):114−117. YANG Yuanping, CHEN Gang, CHEN Taoxiao, et al. Experimental study on the maximum scouring depth of layered riverbed at pipeline crossing Fuchunjiang river section[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2020, 38(12): 114–117.
[16]	宋彦琦,王石磊,孙川,等. 断层端部裂纹扩展相似模拟试验及力学机理[J]. 煤田地质与勘探,2019,47(5):150−156. SONG Yanqi,WANG Shilei,SUN Chuan,et al. Similar model test and mechanical analysis of fault structure[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration,2019,47(5):150−156. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.05.021 SONG Yanqi, WANG Shilei, SUN Chuan, et al. Similar model test and mechanical analysis of fault structure[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2019, 47(5): 150–156. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1986.2019.05.021
[17]	周益人,尹畅安. 波浪边界层下的泥沙起动[J]. 泥沙研究,2004(1):15−22. ZHOU Yiren,YIN Chang’an. Criterion for the initiation of sediment movement in different boundary layers under oscillatory waves[J]. Journal of Sediment Research,2004(1):15−22. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0468-155X.2004.01.003 ZHOU Yiren, YIN Changan. Criterion for the initiation of sediment movement in different boundary layers under oscillatory waves[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2004(1): 15–22. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0468-155X.2004.01.003
[18]	张丰良,王新涛. 浅谈防洪影响评价中河道冲刷深度计算[J]. 中国防汛抗旱,2013,23(5):46−47. ZHANG Fengliang,WANG Xintao. Discussion on calculation of river erosion depth in flood control impact assessment[J]. China Flood & Drought Management,2013,23(5):46−47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9264.2013.05.020 ZHANG Fengliang, WANG Xintao. Discussion on calculation of river erosion depth in flood control impact assessment[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2013, 23(5): 46–47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9264.2013.05.020
[19]	伯彦萍. 穿河管道周围流场及冲刷特性试验研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2017. BAI Yanping. Experimental study on flow field and scouring characteristics around river pipeline[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2017.
[20]	亓培锋,孟庆浩,井雅琪,等. 电子鼻中预处理算法选择及阵列优化[J]. 数据采集与处理,2015,30(5):1099−1108. QI Peifeng,MENG Qinghao,JING Yaqi,et al. Preprocessing algorithm selection and optimization of sensor array in electronic noses[J]. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing,2015,30(5):1099−1108. QI Peifeng, MENG Qinghao, JING Yaqi, et al. Preprocessing algorithm selection and optimization of sensor array in electronic noses[J]. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 2015, 30(5): 1099–1108.
[21]	王靖源. 非开挖HDD对河床冲刷深度影响研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2020. WANG Jingyuan. Research on the influence of trenchless HDD on riverbed erosion depth[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2020.
[22]	黎坤,曾彩华,江涛,等. 前山河水力排污冲淤联合调度试验及效果分析[J]. 地理科学,2006,26(1):101−106. LI Kun,ZENG Caihua,JIANG Tao,et al. Collaborative experiment of Qianshanhe river on draining pollution water and removing silt by utilizing water power and experiment effect analysis[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2006,26(1):101−106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2006.01.017 LI Kun, ZENG Caihua, JIANG Tao, et al. Collaborative experiment of Qianshanhe river on draining pollution water and removing silt by utilizing water power and experiment effect analysis[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2006, 26(1): 101–106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2006.01.017

施引文献(21)

期刊类型引用(13)

1.	韩泰然，李昂，吕璐娜. 平煤矿区十二矿下保护层开采底板破坏深度数值模拟研究. 能源与环保. 2024(02): 241-247 . 百度学术
2.	刘国磊，梁文昭，孟圣师，田利华，郑寓超，崔嵛. 孤岛工作面开采顶板深孔预裂减冲机制及微震响应特征. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报. 2024(06): 145-158 . 百度学术
3.	王永宝，云明，徐庆国，刘磊. 基于系统融合的三位一体底板水害智能预警系统研究. 煤炭技术. 2023(01): 213-218 . 百度学术
4.	陈龙，王国举. 综放孤岛工作面底板破坏微震规律分析. 煤炭与化工. 2023(04): 87-89+102 . 百度学术
5.	张党育，武斌，贾靖，赵立松，李玉宝. 基于微震数据及模型的煤矿水害“双驱动”预警体系构建与应用. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(S1): 242-255 . 百度学术
6.	于青慧. 义棠煤业100602工作面底板破坏深度研究. 煤炭与化工. 2023(12): 50-57 . 百度学术
7.	余国锋，汪敏华，任波，魏廷双，韩云春，郑群，李连崇，陈建. 基于采场固有锚杆的煤层底板微震循环监测方法. 采矿技术. 2022(03): 124-127 . 百度学术
8.	宁殿艳. 煤层底板突水光纤光栅多参数传感监测系统研究. 煤炭工程. 2022(08): 115-121 . 百度学术
9.	王兴明，刘英锋，南生辉，郭康，尚荣. 奥灰承压水上采场底板沿工作面倾向破坏特征分析. 煤炭科学技术. 2022(12): 206-214 . 百度学术
10.	穆鹏飞. 煤层开采后顶底板的破坏规律及水害防治. 黑龙江科技大学学报. 2021(01): 6-13 . 百度学术
11.	连会青，徐斌，田振焘，刘德民，杨艺，潘光义，王瑞. 矿井水情监测与水害风险预警平台设计与实现. 煤田地质与勘探. 2021(01): 198-207 . 本站查看
12.	易强，吕继龙，代英浩，王云龙. 倾斜煤层综放开采覆岩破坏高度实测研究. 矿山测量. 2021(04): 30-33 . 百度学术
13.	靳德武，赵春虎，段建华，乔伟，鲁晶津，李鹏，周振方，李德山. 煤层底板水害三维监测与智能预警系统研究. 煤炭学报. 2020(06): 2256-2264 . 百度学术